Development of Drug-Induced Cutaneous Vasculitis in a Patient with Relapsed Angioimmunoblastic T-cell Lymphoma Treated with Novel Bortezomib and Panobinostat Combination : A Possible Surrogate Marker of Response

Yuh Shan Lee1, Leonard Tan2, Choon Chiat Oh3, Yuen Li Ng4, Yeow Tee Goh1 and Daryl Tan1* 1Department of Hematology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore 2Department of Pathology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore 3Department of Dermatology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore 4Department of Radiology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore Cancer Science & Research: Open Access Open Access Case Report


Introduction
Relapsed/refractory angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AITL) after conventional chemotherapy carries an extremely poor prognosis, and there is currently no recognized effective treatment available.There is hence, an unmet need for novel agents in salvaging patients with relapsed/refractory AITL.Bortezomib exerts pleotropic anti-tumor effects, including inhibition of the NF-кB pathway, leading to cell apoptosis and it has shown promising activity in a variety of lymphoid malignancies [1][2][3][4].Panobinostat, a pan-histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor which targets epigenetic and multiple oncogenic pathways has demonstrated potent anti-tumour activity in a variety of malignancies, including T-cell lymphoma [5][6].In vitro and in vivo studies have demonstrated potent synergistic cytotoxicity of the combination of bortezomib with panobinostat.Inhibition of HDAC6 by panobinostat abrogates bortezomibinduced protective aggreosome formation and accentuates bortezomib induced endoplasmic reticulum stress, leading to further apoptosis [7][8][9].Collectively, these data provide a strong rationale for the first clinical trial of this novel combination in T-cell lymphoma.
The development of a vasculitic rash has been reported with the use of bortezomib and this has been associated to portend a favorable response to the drug among patients with B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma treated in clinical trials [10].Among most cases reported, a perivascular leukocytoclastic vasculitis with no evidence of a systemic vasculitis or hypersensitivity reaction was reported.Herein, we report on a patient with relapsed AITL who responded favourably to the above described combination and developing a typical bortezomib-induced rash after 2 cycles of treatment.

Case Report
A 50 year old male presented with fever, tonsillar     with a non-necrotizing cutaneous vasculitis (Figure 4).There was no evidence of lymphoma infiltration or hypersensitivity reaction.The peripheral hypereosinophilia resolved upon commencement of the study drugs.An interim computed tomography (CT) scan done at this juncture demonstrated a partial response by Cheson criteria, with significant interval reduction in size of the lymphadenopathy (Figures 1b, 2b).The rash was self-limiting and resolved spontaneously.A milder eruption of a similar rash occurred with the subsequent administration of the study drugs.The patient continues to respond further.

Discussion
The causal association of the rash with bortezomib is apparent by the pattern of resolving and recurring rash following cessation and re-introduction of the drug.Development of a rash has not been commonly described as an adverse event with the use of

Development of Drug-Induced Cutaneous Vasculitis in a Patient with Relapsed Angioimmunoblastic T-cell Lymphoma Treated with Novel Bortezomib and Panobinostat Combination: A Possible Surrogate Marker of Response
Copyright: © 2014 DarylTan et al.
panobinostat [6].There was no evidence of a hypersensitivity reaction and on the contrary, the commencement of the novel combination suppressed the peripheral blood hypereosinophilia, a surrogate of disease activity in AITL.In addition, the skin biopsy excluded the possibility of lymphomatous involvement of the skin, a common occurrence with AITL.To the best of our knowledge, this is the first reported case of bortzomib-induced rash occurring in T-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma.The first reports of bortezomib-induced rash were among bortezomibtreated patients with multiple myeloma, with reported incidence in clinical trials ranging from 8 to 18% [11][12][13].In myeloma, the correlation between rash and response to treatment could not be further ascertained because glucocorticoids, an integral component of myeloma therapy could dampen the immune response in patients.Although the exact pathogenesis of the rash is unknown, it is likely to be immune-mediated as cutaneous vasculitis is seen in autoimmune condition such as ulcerative colitis.Kim et al. [14] suggest that the pathogenesis of the rash may be related to the overproduction of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-6 and TNF-a.Similar cytokines are also proposed to be the pathogenesis behind bortezomib induced lung injury [15].Maruyama et al. [16] suggest that the origin of cytokines in bortezomib-treated patient is from bone marrow stromal cells.
Based on results of 3 phase II studies on bortezomib in patients with B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma, Gerecitano and colleagues were able to demonstrate a statistically significant positive predictability of response to bortezomib among patients developing the rash, prompting the current recommendation that therapy with bortezomib should not be discontinued in such patients, but rather, continued treatment through the rash with symptomatic relief is to be encouraged [10].survival of less than 3 years, the optimal therapeutic approach for AITL is still unknown as various strategies including intensive chemotherapeutic combinations and stem cell transplantation have not significantly improved survival outcomes.Clearly, novel approaches exploring synergistic combinations are needed.Published work now suggests that targeting both proteasomedependent pathways with bortezomib and the aggresome pathway in tumour cells with HDAC inhibitors induces greater accumulation of polyubiquitinated proteins resulting in increased cell stress and apoptosis [7][8][9].Both bortezomib and panobinostat have modest single-agent activity in T-cell lymphoma.The clinical combination of both drugs will help determine if the abundant preclinical data of proteasome inhibitor/HDAC inhibitor synergism could translate into improved clinical outcomes for patients with T-cell lymphoma.This novel treatment combination for AITL is promising and results of our trial in the future will hopefully fill the emergent need for improved treatment strategies in these patients.

with
Relapsed Angioimmunoblastic T-cell Lymphoma Treated with Novel Bortezomib and Panobinostat Combination: A Possible Surrogate Marker of Response.Cancer Sci Res Open Access 1(2): 1-4.

Figure 1 :
Figure 1: Post therapy.* White arrows show submental lymph nodes at baseline and after completion of treatment.Figures 1a and 1b: Axial CT neck; (a) shows submental lymphadenopathy which significantly improved on the post therapy CT (b).

Figure 2 :
Figure 2: Coronal CT pelvis; (a) shows bilateral inguinal lymphadenopathy (the arrows indicating the 3 largest nodes), which significantly improved on the post-therapy CT (b).* White arrows show the inguinal lymph nodes at baseline and after completion of treatment.

Figure 3 :
Figure 3: Skin lesions of patient with bortezomib induced rash.Skin lesions of patient with bortezomib induced rash.

with
Relapsed Angioimmunoblastic T-cell Lymphoma Treated with Novel Bortezomib and Panobinostat Combination: A Possible Surrogate Marker of Response.Cancer Sci Res Open Access 1(2): 1-4.

Figure 4 :
Figure 4: Skin biopsy of patient from right forearm.* Black arrows showing perivascular lymphoid infiltrates in skin biopsy