A Case of an Infectious Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Presenting Twelve Years after an Acute Q-Fever Infection

A Case of an Infectious Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Presenting Twelve Years after an Acute Q-Fever Infection Pierre-Olivier Lebel1, Stefan Luu1, Mathieu Pelletier1*, Nicolas Aubree2, Jean-Francois Boisvert3 1Unité de Médecine Familiale du Nord de Lanaudière, Université Laval, St-Charles-Borromée, Qc, Canada 2Department of Surgery, Centre Hospitalier Régional de Lanaudière, St-Charles-Borromée, Qc, Canada 3Department of Medicine, Centre Hospitalier Régional de Lanaudière, St-Charles-Borromée, Qc, Canada SOJ Microbiology & Infectious Diseases Open Access Case Report


Introduction
Q fever is a zoonotic disease caused by the proteobacteria Coxiella burnetii.They are acute and chronic infections.Clinical manifestations are varied and non-specific.Diagnosis, follow up quadrant abdominal pain and chills.A non-infused abdominal CTscan was performed to rule out any intra-abdominal pathology such as diverticulitis.It showed a diffuse inflammation touching the anterior portion of the infrarenal aorta, which measured a diameter of 46 mm.Possible diagnosis were, an inflammatory or mycotic aneurysm or hematoma stemming from an encapsulated rupture.There was also an asymmetry between the left and right psoas muscles.The man was afebrile with a normal complete blood count.His pain was really slight and it was chosen to complete the investigation and perform close follow-up.He was not properly interested by surgery.
An abdominal angioscan was done few days later showing the previously described inflammation on the anterior portion of the aorta, but lumen of the aorta was in fact 36 mm diameter (Figure 1a).However, a collection was discovered in the left psoas (Figure 1b).An aspiration of this psoas collection was CT-guided and demonstrated a whitish viscous substance not frankly purulent.Final cytological results showed necrotizing granulomatous inflammation with severe lymphoplasmacytic inflammation.There were no micro-organisms nor was there any evidence of neoplasia.Transesophageal echocardiograms did not show any signs of endocarditis.A white-blood-cell scintigraphy was also negative.
Two weeks later, the control CT scan showed signs of deterioration with a newly found ulceration of the aorta.The aortic inflammation had also progressed in size.A surgical treatment was then decided with the patient.
Resection of all inflammatory aorta and periaortic tissue adjacent to the aneurysm was performed as well as an aorto-aortic bypass with a Dacron graft.The inflammatory and granulomatous aspect of the aorta strongly suggested an infection.Autologous grafts or rifampicin drenched Dacron grafts were not available at that time in our regional centre.After completion of the debridement and graft, povidone in situ lavage of the surgical bed was performed.PCR tests on the tissue sample was later positive for Coxiella burnetii.The pathology report spoke of extensive necrosis, lymphoplasmacytic inflammation and rare granulomas.
Serologies by Immunofluorescence Assay (IFA) demonstrated a phase I IgG titer ≥ 1:32768 and phase II IgG titer ≥ 16384.A long term treatment of doxycycline and hydroxychloroquine was started with a close serologic follow up on an outpatient basis.A few months later, an abdominal angiographic CT-scan showed a residual infiltration of the aorta.However, a PET-scan essentially ruled out infection of the graft.
Follow up serologies demonstrated a slight improvement immediately following the surgery but have been fluctuating every since (Table 1).The treatment has proven to be difficult because many side effects have forced the patient to cease the medication on numerous occasions.Observance to the treatment was also frequently questioned by the patient.It was stated to the patient that antibiotics are likely to be required for life due to the high risk of graft infection but he is not really compliant to serologic follow-up nor to antibiotics.Annual CT-scan was accepted by the patient and always shown stability in the images, with few residual infiltration of the aorta and no changes on the graft site (to-date, last CT was in May 2015).
In July 2015 the man was still alive and without infectious symptoms.This information was obtained on a follow-up visit with his family physician.

Discussion
Q fever is a zoonosis caused by the obligate intracellular bacterium Coxiella burnetii [1] .First described in Australia, the most recent epidemic took place in the Netherlands in 2007 [2].Its presence is endemic in almost every country worldwide.In North America, it has most often been reported in Nova Scotia [1].

A Case of an Infectious Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Presenting Twelve Years after an Acute Q-Fever Infection
Copyright: © 2015 Pelletier et al.
Transmission of Q fever occurs mostly through aerosols from urine, stool, milk and especially birth products of infected farm animals.Less frequent forms of transmission include ingestion of non-pasteurized dairy products, transcutaneous transmission (primarily by infected ticks) and vertical transmission.However, many affected patients live in urban areas or did not have any direct contact with animals.Wind plays an important role in carrying aerosols to this population.Finally, human-to-human transmission is exceptionally rare [1].
The manifestations of the infection can be acute, chronic as well as subclinical.The acute phase of the infection is often asymptomatic (approximately 60%).When symptomatic, the acute disease is most often described as a febrile or flu like syndrome (17%), hepatitis (40%) and atypical pneumonia (17%).Rare manifestations include central nervous system infection, pericarditis or myocarditis (1% each).A non-specific rash (11%) and thrombocytopenia (35%) are possible presentations of an acute infection [1].Because the clinical presentation of Q fever is polymorphic and nonspecific, the incidence of acute Q fever among humans is probably underestimated [3].Chronic Q fever is defined as an infection that persists for over 6 months.It can occur months or years after the acute episode.The chronic disease can develop in 1.5-11% of patients [1,4].Previous studies showed the most common form of chronic Q fever, is culture-negative endocarditis (78%) followed by vascular infections (9%) and primarily infected aortic aneurysms.It can also be rarely found as an osteoarticular infection (2%) or as a form of chronic hepatitis (3%) [1,3,5].
Since 2007, the Netherlands has experienced the world's largest outbreak of Q fever, with more than 4000 notified acute Q fever cases [6].Many new data were collected on the disease.In the Dutch Q fever epidemic, abdominal aortic and/or iliac disease is seemingly a more significant risk factor in developing chronic Q fever than a history of cardiac valve surgery and more patients was found with vascular chronic Q fever compared to patients presenting with Q fever endocarditis [2,6,7].Hypothesis is now that acute infection evolves into a chronic infection as a continuous process.
Significant host risk factors responsible for chronicisation now include valvular surgery, vascular and cardiac prosthesis, aneurysms, renal insufficiency in age > 60 years-old [2].Non hematoloigc malignancy, immunosuppression and pregnancy also seemed to be risk factors, but these still remain uncertain.Further studies on the subject are needed and ongoing.Reports showed no elevated risk for patients with mild valvulopathy in the Netherlands outbreak [8].
Q-fever diagnosis is most often made with serologies.In acute infection, titers take 1 to 2 weeks to become positive and negativization occurs up to a year later.Serologic testing allows differentiation between acute and chronic Q infection from the antibodies profile.Acute Q fever is characterized by antiphase II antibodies, whereas anti-phase I antibodies are seen in the chronic phase [3].Phase I antibody titers that persist (typically IgG > 1:1024) for over 6 months after an acute infection, that reappear or that are initially superior than phase II antibody titers suggest a chronic infection.After an acute infection, patients should be followed both clinically and serologically [1,5,9].
Until recently, recommendations concerning serological follow-up for the identification of chronic Q fever following an acute Q fever infection in patients with one or more risk factors were often based on clinical experience.Hagenaars et al. [7] proposed in a recent publication a standardized and differentiated serological follow-up of patients with aortoiliac disease and Q fever infection.Their approach is promising and they propose to continue the follow-up of their cohort in the future to validate it.Serological testing is done every 3, 6 or 12 months, relying on the specific serological profile of the patient.In case of a negative serological profile (negative IgG phase II and negative IgG phase I), they propose the patient should be discharged for follow-up.
There is sufficient evidence to support serological followup of all known acute Q-fever patients at least once during the first year following the acute infection, and more frequently in patients with known risk factors for chronic disease [10].Also, the targeted screening programme for risk groups should be considered in outbreaks of Q fever [6].
Acute infections can be treated when diagnosis is made before resolution of symptoms.Usual treatment consists of 100 mg of doxycycline BID for 14 days [9].Treatment for chronic infections has mainly been studied for endocarditis and requires long-term antibiotics (more than 18 months) as well as a close follow-up of antibody titers [9,11].Doxycycline is then often combined with either hydroxychloroquine, rifampin or quinolone [3,9,12].When endocarditis or vascular infection is proven, treatment should be at least 3 years of double coverage [3].Certain experts recommend a lifelong treatment [13] as there have been cases of relapse after cessation of antibiotics in spite of over 3 years of treatment [14].Most crucial of all is to pursue treatment when antibody titers remain elevated [9].

A Case of an Infectious Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Presenting Twelve Years after an Acute Q-Fever Infection
Copyright: © 2015 Pelletier et al.
been shown to significantly improve prognosis [11].Several open surgical options exist for mycotic aortic aneurysms.These include open aortic reconstruction using femoral veins, aortic homografts or rifampin-bonded Dacron grafts with an omental pedicle flap.Endovascular reparation with rifampin soaking dacron-based endografts is also a promising option for poor operative candidates [15].Even if there is a flourishing new literature on surgical options for treatment of mycotic aneurysm, hard data are unfortunately still lacking on the subject.
Our case-report raises few questions to be resolved by further investigations.First, it is of interest to consider that the patient did not have any aorta aneurysm at the time of is acute infection.It may be hypotheses that Coxiella burnetii caused the aneurysm on previous atherosclerosis instead of settled within a pre-existing aneurysm and causes it to grow.Evidences on the mehcanism for the development of aneurysms by Coxiella burnetii are lacking.
Second, the finding of necrotizing granulomatous infiltration in the aspiration sample of the psoas collection and also in the aortic wall is relevant.These histologic findings are well described for the aortic wall [16].The Psoas collection distant from aneurysm site is not an usual finding.For Hagenaars et al, [17] clinicians and pathologists should be aware that Chronic Q fever should be included in the list of infectious diseases with necrotizing granulomatous response, such as tuberculosis, cat scratch disease and syphilis.
Third, a very few cases of Q fever describing both the acute and chronic episodes in the same patient have been described.In the case series by Raoult et al. [1], both phases were reported in only 19 of 1383 cases.Among these 19 cases, 3 had an infected aortic aneurysm.The latency between the acute and chronic episodes was between 1 and 3 years.Whereas long latencies have been described in cases of endocarditis (up to 20 years) [18], the unusually long latency between these two episodes (12 years) is, to our knowledge, the longest to have been described in a case of chronic vascular infection.
We can also mention that the clinical outcome of the patient is still good, even if a Dacron graft was installed and patient compliance to antibiotics and serologic follow-up is not strong.

Conclusion
The purpose of this case report is to increase the level of suspicion for Q fever even in low-incidence regions and show the importance of serological follow-up after acute infection.The disease is vastly underdiagnosed and awareness must be raised in order to recognize and properly treat an acute infection.Also, one must be aware of the risk factors for chronic infection as well as the possibility of a long latency of the chronic infection before being symptomatic.
Unfortunately, an adequate treatment of acute Q fever does not preclude a chronic infection.The serological and clinical follow up of such patients are critical.In this case, the patient was lost to follow-up for twelve years before presenting with a Q-fever infected aneurysm.It is thought of importance to keep a high level of suspicion of chronic infection in anyone who reports a past acute episode.When chronic infection is diagnosed, serologic follow-up is crucial and treatment is sometimes required for life.This case-report also presents multiple interesting topics such as the founding of necrotizing granulomatous inflammation in a distant psoas abcess and the fact that no aneurysm was present at the time of primary infection.

Figure 1 :
Figure 1: A) Abdominal angioscan showing an inflammatory aneurysm of the abdominal aorta, total diameter 46 mm.There is a lot of inflammation on the anterior wall (1).The aorta lumen is measured 36 mm (2).B) A collection was found in the left psoas.An aspiration with CT-SCAN guidance demonstrated a severe necrosing granulomatous inflammation.