The Effects of the Hydrogen Peroxide Colloidal-Ag on Dental Unit Waterlines and Waste Waters

The Effects of the Hydrogen Peroxide Colloidal-Ag on Dental Unit Waterlines and Waste Waters Resmiye E. Tirali1*, Gülçin Akça2 and Omer E. Bulut3 1Baskent University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Ankara, Turkey 2Gazi University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Oral Microbiology, Ankara, Turkey 3Baskent University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Ankara, Turkey SOJ Microbiology & Infectious Diseases Open Access Research Article


Introduction
The issue of presence of large numbers of microorganisms in dental unit water has become a major concern in terms of increased risk of infection for dental patients and staff, and is incompatible with good hygiene and cross-infection control practices [1,2].The bacteria isolated from Dental Units Waterlines (DUWLs) included both opportunistic ones and the pathogens [3].The surfaces of DUWLs provide an ideal environment for developing of microbial biofilms [4].Biofilms are well-organized communities of cooperating microorganisms that can include bacteria, protozoa, diatoms, and fungi [5][6][7][8].These microbiotas are predominantly harmless, but potentially pathogenic organisms may also be present in the biofilm [9].
The high-speed dental instruments that are used during dental treatments produce bioaerosols composed of particles varying in size.Some particles evaporate forming droplet nuclei < 5µm in system, the municipal water supply could be bypassed and the system used to add a disinfectant automatically and continuously to the DUWLs throughout patient treatment sessions.For this study continuous application of 5% hydrogen peroxide Colloidal-Ag (5% Huwa-San Dent-6, Roam chemie, Belgium) was preferred and were applied to the DUWLs.
Group 2: For the second treatment group (n = 10) 5% hydrogen peroxide Colloidal-Ag was applied manually to the water bottles of the dental units.
Group 3: 10 of the units served as controls and no disinfectant applied and only distilled water is used in bottles.

Sampling of DUWLs
For all groups; the water samples were taken from DUWLs every week for ten weeks period.After 30 seconds of flushing, samples were collected at approximately mid-morning from the distal outlets of the three-in-one syringes of DUWLs.Approximately 50 ml of water sample passed through a sterile nozzle into a sterile water bottle containing 0.1 g sodium thiosulfate to remove any residual disinfectant.For Group 1 and 3 waste water samples were collected from a reservoir designed for the collection of waste water.Samples were returned to the laboratory in a cool box with in 1 h and then they were serially diluted, spread-plated in duplicate onto R2A agar plates (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) and incubated at 28°C for seven days and average bacterial counts were expressed as colony-formatting units per milliliter (cfu/ mL).Total viable counts (TVCs) were used as the definitive measure of total microbial contamination of the water passing through the DUWLs.This was compared with the U.S. guideline for DUWLs of ≤ 200 cfu/ mL as recommended by the ADA.They were inoculated onto various specific agar media and incubated at 28-37°C for 2-7 days.After counting the colonies of microorganisms, they were identified and the mean numbers were determined as cfu/mL.
The presence of staphylococci was identified by culturing samples on mannitol salt agar for discrimination of S. aureus and they were also investigated by conventional microbiological test method and identified by API Staph system (BioMèrieux, France).The presence of Streptococci w was identified by morphologically and serologically by grouping specifies of them.
The presence of gram negative bacteria w was evaluated by using Citrate, Indole and urea media.Pseudomonadaceae were identified by culturing samples on Cetrimide agar media and using Triple sugar iron media and oxidase test.Besides, colonies which are supposed to be Pseudomonas aeruginosa were underwent biochemical identification test using API 20 NE system (BioMèrieux, France).
The presence of Candida strains were evaluated by culturing them on Sabouraud Dextrose Agar dimorphically and were identified as yeast-like fungi by their morphological properties and by using germ tube assay they were defined as C. albicans and C. non albicans.Legionella spp. was evaluated by culturing the samples on Legionella selective medium.

Statistical Analysis
Data analysis was performed by using SPSS for Windows, version 11.5 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, United States).Data were shown as mean ± standard deviation (min-max).
The mean differences among groups within each measurement time were evaluated by One-Way ANOVA.When the p value from One-Way ANOVA are statistically significant post hoc Tukey HSD test was used to identify which group differ from others.According to the Bonferroni Correction, p < 0.005 was considered statistically significant.The mean differences among measurement times within each group were analyzed by Repeated Measurement of ANOVA, Wilks' Lambda test.According to the Bonferroni Correction, p < 0.01 was considered statistically significant.Logarithmic transformation was done for number of microorganism within each statistical analysis.For all possible multiple comparisons, the Bonferroni Correction was applied for controlling Type I error.

Results
Each sample was evaluated by culturing them on their specific agar media which are mentioned at methods.Then, total heterotrophic plate counts were calculated.The isolated and identified microorganisms were given at Table 1.Legionella strains weren't found in the samples.
Ten weeks of logarithmic mean of microorganism calculated for the whole groups (Figure 1).There was no significant difference between the treatment groups' DUWLs and had counts of less than 200 CFU/ mL A statistically significant difference in median TVCs reduction was found between the treatment and control groups' DUWLs for all weeks (p < 0.01).However, there was no significant difference between Group 1 and control group's waste waters.Biofilm formation was more evident in the control group's both DUWLs and waste waters.

Discussion
The goal of infection control of DUWLs water is to minimize the risk from exposure to potential pathogens and to create a safe working environment for patients as well as dentists.Water used for cooling the hand pieces and flushing is considered as a way of microbiological transmission of pathogens to patients and doctors, and of cross-infections [19].American Dental Association (ADA) states that 200 colony-forming units per milliliter (CFU/ mL) as a standard microbial count for water samples [6,20].For these reasons; effective mechanical techniques and chemical disinfectants for eliminating the biofilm from the inner surface of DUWLs need to be applied.Numerous suggestions for reducing the bacterial density in dental unit water have been proposed but none has been universally adopted that is both efficient at eliminating biofilm, as well as being safe for patients [16,21].
Biofilms have a big role in certain infectious diseases and importance in a variety of device-related infections so it is important to understand biofilm processes, effective control strategies to resulting improvement in patient management [7].In a series of trials, treating of DUWLs with sodium hypochlorite,

The Effects of the Hydrogen Peroxide Colloidal-Ag on Dental Unit Waterlines and Waste Waters
Copyright: © 2016 Tirali et al.

Table 1:
Types of the microorganisms which are mostly isolated and identified from the samples.

Sample groups Gram positive bacteria Gram negative bacteria Fungal agents
Group 1

Waste water samples
Staphylococcus aureus Streptococci spp.

Viridans streptococci
Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella sp.Enterobacter spp.Citrobacter spp.glutaraldehyde, and isopropanol was investigated.These agents reduced microorganisms in effluent water but did not destroy the biofilm matrix in the DUWLs, even with periodic treatments [8].Similar results were obtained for Listerine, Bio 2000, Rembrandt, and Sodium fluoride [18].There are now an increasing number of commercial disinfectants that claim to reduce the microbial burden of the DUWLs and thereby minimize the risk of occupational exposure and cross-infection.A number of studies have evaluated a broad range of products, suitable for use in DUWLs, which are claimed to reduce the microbial loading of dental unit water systems and to remove the biofilm attached to the inner surfaces of the dental unit water line tubing [13][14][15]22].The studies that investigated the effect of hydrogen peroxide silver ions disinfectant have shown that it is easy to use its continuous application caused a significant decrease in the number of total fungi.In addition, 91% of the treated water samples had a TVC of ≤ 200 CFU/ mL after its application [13,17,23].In this study; hydrogen peroxide Colloidal-Ag was used to reduce total viable counts in DUWLs and similar results were shown.In the present study, in the end of week 10, dental units' microbial counts which were treated with hydrogen peroxide colloidal-Ag, were less than 200 CFU/mL for both manual and automatic application.The effectiveness of the manual application of hydrogen peroxide Colloidal-Ag in the eradication of biofilm was shown in a previous study [24].In the present study, automatic application system was found to be as effective as the manual application.Thus, a re-examination of the effect on wastewater was not needed.Although the manual application is as effective as the automatic application, problems can arise in applying the disinfectant according to the manufacturer's instructions as non automated procedures depends on the dental staff.So, it is important to know adjustment been done automatically.

Candida albicans, Candida non albicans
In fact, in most countries, no distinction is usually made between the dental unit wastewaters and urban effluent, and this can cause potentially hazardous loads which are generally discharged directly into the public sewage network.Identifying environmental reservoirs of Methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA), as well as Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in the community, might be critical for controlling