- Reviewers should not disclose their identity to the authors, at any stage of the publication of the manuscript.
- Reviewers should not be biased or partial while reviewing the manuscript.
- Reviewers should submit the acceptance letter once it is assigned to them.
- Reviewers should review the manuscript within the provided timeline in order to facilitate timely completion of the review process.
- Reviewer should directly inform the editor if the manuscript does not meet the standards of the journal or there is no quality content in the manuscript.
- Reviewers should directly contact the editor/editorial office if there is any problem in the manuscript content/ figures/ tables/ experimental data
- Articles are assigned based on the research interests of the reviewer. They can approach the assigned editor/editorial office if the manuscript is beyond their expertise.
- Reviewers have to remember that the final decision to accept or reject will depend on the comments from the editor.
Testimonials
I certificate high significance and superlative quality of JCSAIT (i.e. Journal of Computer Science Applications and Information Technology) with superlative collective of responsible specialists. Journal JCSAIT publish papers and research-articles within acceptable interval of time.
MV Levskii
Scientist
"I am very happy and grateful to be associated with your journal.The journal is making wonderful progress. IT is gratifying to see the efforts of all the team members. I am sure in coming years remarkable advancement will be made. Wishing you all success and laurels in the coming years!
Thulasi G Pillai
Scientist
It was a pleasure working with you. From the beginning you were very attentive and the process of submission, correction and subsequent publication was extremely efficient. Looking forward to publishing together again.
Gustavo Moreira Amorim
Scientist
I'm happy with your journal because of its fastness and quality. So, you have to continue with the same action and you can be successful in your journey with the journal.
Zelalem Abera
Scientist
Indeed, Journal of Nutritional Health & Food Sciences is new but in the class of well-established and top-ranked journals with a submission to rejection or publication real-time review value
Anthony Cemaluk C Egbuonu
Scientist
I recently had the opportunity to publish the results of one of my latest research contributions in the Journal of Computer Science Applications and Information Technology: it is my great pleasure to congratulate them for the quality of their work!
Christian Mancas
Scientist
Photo gallery
Reviewer Guidelines
The authenticity of scientific literature depends on effective peer review. A published paper reflects not only on the authors of that paper but also on the group of readers. Without the judgment of knowledgeable peers as a standard for evaluating the quality of science, it would be impossible to adjudge content credibility.
Reviewers play a significant role in publishing. Peer Review system is an important process for quality of research, scientific validation and publication. Symbiosis Open Access Journals welcomes scientists, researchers, academicians and scholars interested in serving as volunteer reviewer. Any researcher with Ph.D. as a minimum educational qualification is eligible to be a reviewer. Symbiosis publishes about 70 peer-reviewed Journals in the field of science & engineering. The list of journals is available here. A reviewer has to review the articles received from the editorial office or the editor within the specifically mentioned timeline.
Guidelines to be followed while reviewing the articles:
If you are interested in joining as a reviewer for our journals, kindly mail us your CV along with the journal of interest to info@symbiosisonline.org. Respective Journal Team will respond to you at the earliest.
Join as Reviewer