Editorial
Open Access
Global Burden of Diabetes- Rising Expenditures on
Healthcare Economy
Pradeep Kumar Dabla1*, Vandana Dabla2
1Department of Biochemistry, G.B Pant Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education & Research, Associated to Maulana Azad Medical College,
New Delhi, India
2NISCHIT CDC-SHARE INDIA SHARE INDIA, MIMS Campus, Ghanpur Village, Medchal Mandal, Telangana, India
2NISCHIT CDC-SHARE INDIA SHARE INDIA, MIMS Campus, Ghanpur Village, Medchal Mandal, Telangana, India
*Corresponding author: Pradeep Kumar Dabla, Department of Biochemistry, G.B Pant Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education & Research, Associated to Maulana Azad Medical College, New Delhi, India; E-mail:
@
Received: November 03,2018; Accepted: November 10,2018; Published: November 13,2018
Citation: Pradeep Kumar D, Vandana D (2018) Global Burden of Diabetes- Rising Expenditures on Healthcare Economy. J Endocrinol Diab. 5(6): 1-2.
DOI: 10.15226/2374-6890/5/6/001120
Abstract
The dynamics of the diabetes epidemic are changing rapidly. It is
a matter of concern on global scale from a public health perspective
and also in relation to rising societal costs. Once a disease of the West,
type 2 diabetes has now spread to every country in the world from
affluence to poor.
The rising cost and ever increasing burden on health care resources to treat and monitor diabetes and its complications put a heavy financial and manpower burden on national health care systems. Asia’s large population and rapid economic development have made it an epicenter of the epidemic. Asian populations tend to develop diabetes at younger ages and lower BMI levels than Caucasians. Interactions between Westernized diet and lifestyle and genetic background may accelerate the growth of diabetes in the context of rapid nutrition transition. This epidemic is primarily driven by rapid urbanization, nutrition transition, and increasingly sedentary lifestyles. It reflects affluence and exposure to increased calorie intake in combination with sedentary lifestyle and less human energy expenditure. However, primary prevention through changes in public policies, the food and built environments, health systems and promotion of a healthy diet and lifestyle should be a global public policy priority.
Keywords: Diabetes; Type 2 diabetes; T2DM; Obesity; Global epidemic; Financial burden; prevention; factors
The rising cost and ever increasing burden on health care resources to treat and monitor diabetes and its complications put a heavy financial and manpower burden on national health care systems. Asia’s large population and rapid economic development have made it an epicenter of the epidemic. Asian populations tend to develop diabetes at younger ages and lower BMI levels than Caucasians. Interactions between Westernized diet and lifestyle and genetic background may accelerate the growth of diabetes in the context of rapid nutrition transition. This epidemic is primarily driven by rapid urbanization, nutrition transition, and increasingly sedentary lifestyles. It reflects affluence and exposure to increased calorie intake in combination with sedentary lifestyle and less human energy expenditure. However, primary prevention through changes in public policies, the food and built environments, health systems and promotion of a healthy diet and lifestyle should be a global public policy priority.
Keywords: Diabetes; Type 2 diabetes; T2DM; Obesity; Global epidemic; Financial burden; prevention; factors
Core Tip
Obesity and Type 2 diabetes pose a serious public health
and economic threat for world. Cases of obesity and diabetes
are increasing inevitably with impending costs to health and
economic systems. World leaders need to set an example of
successful innovative prevention and treatment programs, fully
supported by all government stakeholders in partnership with
private sector and civil society.
Introduction
Over the last 2 decades with the increasing industrialization
and mechanization in today’s world, the type 2 diabetes (T2DM)
emerged as a global public health threat. Epidemiological studies
have predicted that whereas 422 million subjects were affected
by diabetes in 2014, the coming decades may see an astonishing
438 million adults affected by 2030 The burden of diabetes has
increased faster in low-income and middle-income countries in
terms of both prevalence and rising number of adult patients.
With increased international trade came an influx of fatty foods
accessible to all. Technology such as computers and mobile
devices led to less physical activity and contributed to weight
gain. The tremendous cost of this diabetes epidemic can be
counted not only in financial terms as cost of illness, treatment,
and disability, but also in terms of the human cost of suffering and
a lowered health related quality of life.
Demographic overload
Compared with Western populations, the prevalence
of overweight and obesity in Asia is relatively low, but it is
increasing proportionately. Though, rate of obesity is not directly
proportional to diabetes. Asians develop diabetes at younger ages,
at lower degrees of obesity, and at much higher rates. According
to the Gallup-Healthways Well-Being Index, the obesity rate
among American adults is 28%, while diabetes tops 11%. Nearly
one in five smokes, two in five experience significant daily stress,
and almost half do not exercise for 30 minutes or more at least
three days per week. In Mexico, roughly a third of the population
is now obese, and the proportion of obese children is the highest
in the world. Type 2 diabetics in Mexico are expected to double in
number by 2050. Asia accounts for 60% of the world’s diabetic
population due to rapid economic development, urbanization,
and transitions in nutritional status. This led to an explosive
increase in diabetes prevalence within a relatively short time.
In India as well, obesity has surged, and children are afflicted in
both urban and poor rural areas. India’s Type 2 diabetes rate is 10
times what it was in the 1970s, and by 2030 there are expected to
be 100 million diabetics. In China, more than 120 million people
are now obese; its diabetic population is the largest in the world.
Contributing Factors
Considerably there are number of factors with health
consequences. Overweight and obesity are driving the global
diabetes epidemic. They affect the majority of adults in most
developed countries and are increasing rapidly in developing
countries. Then, the aging of many populations, with an
increasing proportion of elderly people, will contribute to the
growing number of subjects reaching the age ranges where
T2DM becomes more prevalent. Further, the detrimental
lifestyle changes that is now characteristic of not only Western
populations, but also to a substantial proportion of populations
in developing countries. These all added by passive lifestyle
related to sedentary leisure activities, such as watching television
or time spent on the computer. Another contributing risk factor
is smoking and alcohol, now very prevalent in developing
countries as well. American adults who smoke, spends on an
average $2,132 more each year in healthcare costs compared to
nonsmokers. Overweight or obese Americans who smoke add an
astonishing $235 billion in unnecessary healthcare costs each
year. Additional factors include selected diet containing more of
coffee, alcohol, sucrose, and saturated fat with lack of vitamins,
vegetables, and fruits.
Healthcare cost
Human suffering and reduced health-related quality of life
are an additional burden with ever increasing healthcare cost of
globalization for the growing epidemic of T2DM. Cases of obesity
and diabetes will inevitably increase and debilitate costs to these
nations’ health and economic systems. Diabetes among American
adults is estimated to cost the U.S. economy an additional $245.5
billion in 2017 in total healthcare expenditures. Above-normalweight
adults in the U.S. add more than $142 billion each year
in incremental healthcare costs. By the early 2000s, several
nongovernmental organizations, such as the Brazilian Association
of Nutrition and the Brazilian Diabetes Society, began to pressure
the ministry to adopt supportive legislation. In Mexico, obesity
and its associated diseases cost the government’s health care
system between $4.3 billion and $5.4 billion a year. Costs for
diabetes programs and treatment rose from $318 million in
2005 to $343 million in 2010 whereas $4 billion were spent on
diabetes related diseases in 2012.
Indian government expenditures on Type 2 diabetes patients ranged from $25 billion to $38 billion in 2010, mostly on medication and hospitalization which is expected to increase roughly by $237 billion during next decade. In China, in 2009, the government is estimated to have spent $3.5 billion treating obese patients. Recent studies estimates $25 billion a year, and it’s expected to reach $47 billion by 2030. Christian Bommer and colleagues estimated that global economic burden will increase from U.S. $1.3 trillion in 2015 to $2.1 trillion in the target scenarios by 2030. This will lead to increase in costs as a global GDP from 1.8% in 2015 to a maximum of 2.2% in 2030.
Indian government expenditures on Type 2 diabetes patients ranged from $25 billion to $38 billion in 2010, mostly on medication and hospitalization which is expected to increase roughly by $237 billion during next decade. In China, in 2009, the government is estimated to have spent $3.5 billion treating obese patients. Recent studies estimates $25 billion a year, and it’s expected to reach $47 billion by 2030. Christian Bommer and colleagues estimated that global economic burden will increase from U.S. $1.3 trillion in 2015 to $2.1 trillion in the target scenarios by 2030. This will lead to increase in costs as a global GDP from 1.8% in 2015 to a maximum of 2.2% in 2030.
Conclusion
Type 2 diabetes is a global crisis that threatens the health and
economy. This epidemic is primarily driven by rapid urbanization,
nutrition transition, and increasingly sedentary lifestyles. The
diabetes epidemic in Asia is characterized by onset at lower
BMI levels and younger ages. Importantly, primary prevention
through the promotion of a healthy diet and lifestyle should be
a universal policy. Policy makers with local governments need
to implement preventive policy while learning from civil society
how to improve health care services.
Acknowledgements
Dabla P. K & Dabla V conceived the study and drafted the
manuscript; authors approved the final version of the article.
References
- International Diabetes Federation. IDF Diabetes Atlas. Epidemiology and Mobidity. In: International Diabetes Federation. 2018.
- DAN W, SANGEETA A, Obesity, Smoking Damage U.S. Economy. BUSINESS JOURNAL. 2016.
- Barquera SI. Campos and JA Rivera. “Mexico Attempts to Tackle Obesity: The Process, Results, and Push Backs and Future Challenges.” Obesity Reviews. 2013;14(2):69–78. Doi: 10.1111/obr.12096
- Henson J, Dunstan DW, Davies MJ, Yates T. Sedentary behavior as a new behavioral target in the prevention and treatment of type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2016;32(suppl 1):213-220. Doi: 10.1002/dmrr.2759
- Fernandes SD, Sunny DA Fernandes. Economic burden of diabetes mellitus and its socio-economic impact on household expenditure in an urban slum area. Int J Res Med Sci. 2017;5(5):1808-1813. Doi: 10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20171585
- Kanguru L, Bezawada N, Hussein J, Bell J. The burden of diabetes mellitus during pregnancy in low- and middleincome countries: a systematic review. Glob Health Action. 2014;7:23987. Doi: 10.3402/gha.v7.23987
- Chan JC, Malik V, Jia W, Kadowaki T, Yajnik CS, Yoon KH, et al. Diabetes in Asia: epidemiology, risk factors, and pathophysiology. JAMA. 2009;301(20):2129- 2140. Doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.726
- Wang Y, Mi J, Shan XY, Wang QJ, Ge KY. Is China facing an obesity epidemic and the consequences? The trends in obesity and chronic disease in China. Int J Obes (Lond) 2007;31(1):177–188. Doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0803354
- Bommer C, Sagalova V, Heesemann E, Manne-Goehler J, Atun R, Bärnighausen T, et al. Global Economic Burden of Diabetes in Adults: Projections From 2015 to 2030. Diabetes Care. 2018;41(5):963-970. Doi: 10.2337/dc17-1962


