Research Article
Open Access
Insulin Delivery: An Ever Changing Frontier
Muhammad Salman Tahir Janjua1* and Jeffrey Joseph
1Resident, Department of Anesthesiology and Preoperative Medicine, Augusta University Hospital, Augusta, GA.
2Professor and Vice Chair Artificial Pancreas Center, Department of Anesthesiology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA.
2Professor and Vice Chair Artificial Pancreas Center, Department of Anesthesiology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA.
*Corresponding author: Muhammad Salman Tahir Janjua, M.B.B.S., Resident, Department of Anesthesiology & Preoperative Medicine, Augusta University,
Augusta, Georgia, Tel:878-777-3029 E-mail: @
Received: April 4, 2016; Accepted: November 10, 2016; Published:November 22, 2016
Citation: Tahir Janjua MS, Joseph J (2016) Insulin Delivery: An Ever Changing Frontier. J Endocrinol Diab. 3(5): 1-4. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15226/2374-6890/3/5/00161
Abstract
Insulin transport across vascular endothelial cells is the rate
limiting step in its time action profile. Glucose uptake in response to
insulin is estimated through different techniques and is influenced by
insulin sensitivity of the tissue. Glucose clamp technique and minimal
model imply an incremental increase in the levels of insulin in the
ISF compartment evidenced by increase in glucose uptake. This can
not merely be explanied by tissue capillary recruitment or increase
in blood flow of already perfused areas. Although insulin is proven
to affect the blood flow and capillary recruitment of already perfused
areas, restoration of muscle blood flow in insulin resistant patients
does not revert the insulin activity profile. By review of frequently
cited articles, it can be interpreted that insulin causes a much
greater increase in tissue recruitment by increasing the perfused
capillary volume of previously unperfused areas, an increase in the
permeability of the capillaries and recruitment of insulin transport
receptors. This also results in an Increase in volume of distribution
of glucose. Insulin, like other proteins, may be transported across
by simple diffusion, paracellular pathway and transcellular pathway
with the help of transport receptors. In conclusion, insulin is most
likely transported across capillary endothelial cells by more than
one mechanism and there may be recruitment of these pathways
according to insulin levels. Thus further investigations of these
possible pathways may help pave the way for more efficient insulin
delivery methods in the future.
Keywords: IGF1receptors; InsulinReceptors; InsulinInducedtissuerecruitment; Transendothelial; Insulin Transport;
Keywords: IGF1receptors; InsulinReceptors; InsulinInducedtissuerecruitment; Transendothelial; Insulin Transport;
Abbreviation
FSIGT: Frequently Sampled Intravenous Glucose Tolerance;
Vd: Volume of Distribution; TET: Transendothelial Transport
of Insulin; eNOS: Endothelial Nitric Oxide Synthase; PI3K:
Phosphoinositide 3 Kinase
Introduction
Insulin Pharmacodynamics
Insulin is released in response to glucose stimulation of
pancreatic beta cells. Glucose is transported inside the pancreatic
beta cells by GLUT 2 receptors [1]. After internalization it is
metabolized in glycolytic pathway to produce ATP’s [2]. Increased
ATP/ADP ratio deactivates Potassium channels, thus increasing the concentration gradient across the cell membrane. This causes
membrane depolarization [3]. This depolarization activates Ca
channels and cause an increase in intracellular Ca2+ levels and
exocytosis of Insulin [4]. After secretion, insulin is extracted
from the portal blood by hepatocytes and acts on hepatocytes
for glucose utilization [5]. Insulin binds to GLUT4 receptors in
skeletal muscles and adipocytes. Skeletal muscle is the main site
of action of insulin for glucose disposal [6]Glucose internalization
in these tissues is largely dependent on GLUT4 receptors [7]. Any
defect in GLUT4 may result in impaired glucose metabolism in
target tissues [8].
Transendothelial transport as the rate limiting step
TET transport of insulin is the rate limiting step in time
pharmacokinetic profile of insulin [9].This was observed in
experiments utilizing glucose clamp technique. There was a time
delay between achieving steady state insulin concentration in the
plasma and thoracic duct lymph collections while the gradient
between plasma and interstitial fluid insulin concentrations
remained constant. [10] Thoracic duct lymph collections
were considered representative of interstitial fluid. These
measurements and delay was incorporated in Bergman’s Minimal
Model [10]The rate of glucose utilization, in these experiments,
corresponds very closely to the lymph insulin concentrations.
[11] The observed time delay in the insulin action profile was due
to the time taken for the insulin level in the interstitium to rise.
These observations suggested a rate limiting barrier between
Plasma and interstitial fluid [12]. But there was an argument
that insulin might take time to reach the thoracic duct lymph
because of the slower lymph flow. Therefore, another technique
was used in which micro dialysis catheters were used to
measure interstitial fluid insulin concentrations directly during
hyperinsulinemic glucose clamp. It also demonstrated the same
time delay of app.20 min. [13]Dysfunction of this endothelial
barrier is now considered to be a major contributing factor for
type 2 diabetes, obesity and metabolic syndrome. [47]
Capillary Recruitment and insulin uptake by
endothelial cells as rate limiting step
Another rate limiting step in glucose delivery was proposed
because of the observations that the decreased gradient
between plasma and interstitial fluid insulin concentration
at pharmacological doses was contributed by the increase in capillary surface area due to capillary dilation and recruitment
[15].
Increased permeability of capillary wall in response to hyperinsulinemia [16], might explain the increase in tissue volume during hyperinsulinemic clamp. But the effect is too small to quantitatively act as a single contributor. Secondly, there is contradictory evidence to transcapillary escape rate of protiens. One study demonstrated that this effect of insulin is seen only in NIDDM patients while another study shows 14 % decrease in serum albumin levels after hyperinsulinemic clamp even in non diabetic patients, although the serum insulin levels achieved in these two groups were similar. [17] This microvascular recruitment is associated with insulin secretion even before an increase in the muscle blood flow [18]. This recruitment is found to be blunted in obese [19]. There is delayed transcapillary transport of insulin into muscles [20] and there is increased degradation of insulin suggested as contributing causes of insulin resistance. If the flow of blood into the muscle is restored, the A-V glucose difference should increase, however this was not demonstrated by a study that showed that restoring blood flow in these subjects produced only a small effect on the glucose uptake in muscle [21]
Increased permeability of capillary wall in response to hyperinsulinemia [16], might explain the increase in tissue volume during hyperinsulinemic clamp. But the effect is too small to quantitatively act as a single contributor. Secondly, there is contradictory evidence to transcapillary escape rate of protiens. One study demonstrated that this effect of insulin is seen only in NIDDM patients while another study shows 14 % decrease in serum albumin levels after hyperinsulinemic clamp even in non diabetic patients, although the serum insulin levels achieved in these two groups were similar. [17] This microvascular recruitment is associated with insulin secretion even before an increase in the muscle blood flow [18]. This recruitment is found to be blunted in obese [19]. There is delayed transcapillary transport of insulin into muscles [20] and there is increased degradation of insulin suggested as contributing causes of insulin resistance. If the flow of blood into the muscle is restored, the A-V glucose difference should increase, however this was not demonstrated by a study that showed that restoring blood flow in these subjects produced only a small effect on the glucose uptake in muscle [21]
Microvascular pacemakers
The microvascular pacemaker at the arterioles oscillates at
around 18 cycles/min [22] Insulin is also proposed to increase
the open time of arterioles and causing tissue recruitment of
previously unperfused capillary beds. When the perfusion to
a muscle capillary bed increases it also increases the aerobic
metabolism as compared to anaerobic metabolism in normal
states. [23]
Volume of distribution
The Volume of distribution for the glucose increases to 40%
by hyperinsulinemia during forearm balance technique. This
increase may be explained by the expansion of interstitial volume
by either 1) increase in blood flow to the tissues or 2) Capillary
Recruitment. The greater cellular surface area available to
insulin for action due to tissue recruitmentmay can be the cause
of increased glucose uptake in that compartment [23]. During
forearm balance technique, the increase in capillary recruitment
is observed within 20 min after giving insulin. This effect is seen
earlier than any increase in glucose uptake or blood flow. This
effect continues to increase 80-120 min after beginning the
infusion. While the brachial artery blood flow did not increase till
100 min after the start of insulin infusion. Despite the increase
in capillary perfusion, the extraction fraction of insulin and its
clearance decreased at 80-120 min while the insulin levels were
within physiological range [24]. This either points to a saturable
process for the transport of insulin across the endothelial barrier
or a saturable cellular uptake process of insulin to act on muscle
cells and induce glucose uptake.
In a later study on humans, the rate of clearance of insulin [extraction fraction] from muscle capillaries decreased during hysperinsulinemia, even in the presence of increased microvascular volume and muscle blood flow suggesting that asaturable process involves the transport of insulin across muscle capillaries [15]
In a later study on humans, the rate of clearance of insulin [extraction fraction] from muscle capillaries decreased during hysperinsulinemia, even in the presence of increased microvascular volume and muscle blood flow suggesting that asaturable process involves the transport of insulin across muscle capillaries [15]
Confounding factor in the study of acylated insulin
delivery in experiments
Initial studies using dog hind limb lymph collection for NN304
acylated insulin demonstrated that there was an incremental
increase in the level of acylated insulin level in the deep hindlimb
lymph collection even after the saturable doses of normal insulin
were given. It was believed that transport of insulin across
capillary endothelial cells was not a saturable process [25].
The factor that might have influenced the time action profile of the insulin is the type of insulin used in experiments. There are different times to peak and duration of action for different insulins [26]. For example, the half-life of insulin increases by seven fold and the time of onset by twofold if the amino group at B29 is acylated [27]. It may be responsible in decreased clearance of insulin from ISF. Insulin circulates in the blood in monomeric form and gets absorbed across capillaries [28]. Its molecule was first seen by Single Crystal X-ray analysis done by Crawfoot et al. [29]. It has an A chain wrapped around the B chain. Any alteration in the residues on the A chain or B23-30 dramatically alters the interaction of insulin with its receptors [30].
The factor that might have influenced the time action profile of the insulin is the type of insulin used in experiments. There are different times to peak and duration of action for different insulins [26]. For example, the half-life of insulin increases by seven fold and the time of onset by twofold if the amino group at B29 is acylated [27]. It may be responsible in decreased clearance of insulin from ISF. Insulin circulates in the blood in monomeric form and gets absorbed across capillaries [28]. Its molecule was first seen by Single Crystal X-ray analysis done by Crawfoot et al. [29]. It has an A chain wrapped around the B chain. Any alteration in the residues on the A chain or B23-30 dramatically alters the interaction of insulin with its receptors [30].
Proposed Methods of TET insulin transport
There is also evidence that insulin alters the endothelial cells
morphology and permeability characteristics. Endothelium is a
semipermeable membrane. There are signaling pathways that
alter the interendothelial junctions making the interendothelial
pathway leakier. There are different routes defined for
transendothelial transport 1) Paracellular 2) Transcellular.
There is evidence that insulin acts on endothelial cell insulin
receptors via PI3K, MEK, Insulin receptor tyrosine kinase and
the cSrc tyrosine kinase receptors and facilitates its uptake. This
uptake is inhibited by the inflammatory cytokines [31].
Paracellular route
In paracellular route, molecules travel between the cells
when the actin filaments in cell cytoskeleton get activated due
to activation of MLCK pathway. This puts a stretch on the cell
membrane resulting in leaky cell junctions. [32]. Insulin has been
demonstrated to affect the tight junction mediated paracellular
transport in cultured intestinal epithelial cells [33].
Caveolins
Caveolins are intracellular organelles in endothelial cells that
are phosphorylated to transport insulin through the cell to the
interstitium [34, 35]Insulin signaling may be the first step in its
transendothelial transport mediated by PI-3 Kinase, csrc Kinase,
general tyrosine kinase and the mitogen activated protein kinase.
This is a conclusive evidence of the role of endothelial receptors
in TET transport of insulin [31].
Insulin is internalized with caveolin 1 in vascular endothelial cells [36]. This process is facilitated by actin filaments through PI3K/Akt pathway [37]. A defect in cortical F actin filaments/ PIP2 may be an underlying cause of insulin resistance resulting in reduced activity of GLUT4 receptors [38]. After internalization, insulin might get degraded or externalized at a rate dependent on insulin receptor occupancy and temperature [39, 40]. It also proposes a notion that vascular endothelial compartment may act to control blood insulin levels as well [41].
Insulin is internalized with caveolin 1 in vascular endothelial cells [36]. This process is facilitated by actin filaments through PI3K/Akt pathway [37]. A defect in cortical F actin filaments/ PIP2 may be an underlying cause of insulin resistance resulting in reduced activity of GLUT4 receptors [38]. After internalization, insulin might get degraded or externalized at a rate dependent on insulin receptor occupancy and temperature [39, 40]. It also proposes a notion that vascular endothelial compartment may act to control blood insulin levels as well [41].
Cellular sub compartments
Cellular sub compartments may act as a reservoir for
peripheral insulin [42]. The endothelial cells may accumulate
insulin against its concentration gradient up to five times. This
process is mediated by PI3K/Akt pathway. This is a saturable
process hence might act as a rate limiting step [43].
Insulin receptor 2 pathway
Demonstration of another pathway IRS 2 linked to IR/IGF1
receptors that stimulates the PI3K pathway for internalization
of insulin [44]; involvement of IGF 1 receptors for transport of
insulin across endothelium at higher concentrations [45] ;and, in
vitro studies by King et al. That demonstrated that the transport
of radiolabeled insulin across bovine aortic endothelial cells from
extra vascular to intravascular space was not inhibited by the
presence of normal insulin, [46] suggesting alternative pathways
for insulin transport in pharmacological ranges.
Conclusion
Thus studies to utilize direct visualization of the proposed
receptors by electron microscopy on the abluminal side
of endothelial lining will help in conclusively identifying
these receptors. Such a discovery can greatly facilitate our
understanding of the available subcutaneous insulin delivery
methods. It will also help us in the development of effective
insulin formulations and delivery models that have more stable
and predictable time action profiles. Discovery of such receptors
will aid in the future of artificial pancreas. Currently, artificial
pancreas consists of a glucose sensing module that is connected
to a subcutaneous insulin delivery system. The delivery, efficacy
and potency of insulin largely depends on the surrounding milieu
of the insulin delivery site. Up regulation or down regulation of
subcutaneous insulin transport receptors may be contributing
in the variability of insulin response in diabetics. Hence
development of excipients, that may up regulate the insulin
transport receptors, injected with the subcutaneously delivered
insulin, may help in developing more effective artificial pancreas
models. Discussions with Dr Jeffrey Joseph, Vice Chairman and
Director of Thomas Jefferson University Artificial Pancreas
Centre, Department of Anesthesiology, Philadelphia.
References
- Efrat S, Tal M, Lodish HF. The pancreatic β-cell glucose sensor. Trends in biochemical sciences. 1994;19(12):535-538. DOI:dx.doi.org/10.1016/0968-0004(94)90056-6.
- Matschinsky F, Ellerman J. Metabolism of glucose in the islets of Langerhans. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 1968;243(10):2730-2736.
- Cook DL, Satin LS, Ashford ML, Hales CN. ATP-sensitive K+ channels in pancreatic β-cells: spare-channel hypothesis. Diabetes. 1988;37(5):495-498. DOI:dx.doi.org/10.2337/diab.37.5.495.
- Gauthier BR, Wollheim CB. Synaptotagmins bind calcium to release insulin. American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism. 2008;295(6):E1279- E1286. DOI: 10.1152/ajpendo.90568.2008.
- Chap Z, Ishida T, Chou J, Hartley CJ, Entman ML, Brandenburg D, et al. First-pass hepatic extraction and metabolic effects of insulin and insulin analogues. American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology And Metabolism. 1987;252(2):E209-E217.
- DeFronzo R, Jacot E, Jequier E, Maeder E, Wahren J, Felber J. The effect of insulin on the disposal of intravenous glucose: results from indirect calorimetry and hepatic and femoral venous catheterization. Diabetes. 1981;30(12):1000-1007.
- James DE, Brown R, Navarro J, Pilch PF. Insulin-regulatable tissues express a unique insulin-sensitive glucose transport protein. 1988;333(6169):183-185.
- Abel ED, Peroni O, Kim JK, Kim Y-B, Boss O, Hadro E, et al. Adipose-selective targeting of the GLUT4 gene impairs insulin action in muscle and liver. Nature. 2001;409(6821):729-733. DOI:10.1038/35055575.
- Chiu JD, Richey JM, Harrison LN, Zuniga E, Kolka CM, Kirkman E, et al. Direct administration of insulin into skeletal muscle reveals that the transport of insulin across the capillary endothelium limits the time course of insulin to activate glucose disposal. Diabetes. 2008;57(4):828-835. doi: 10.2337/db07-1444.
- Bergman RN. Toward physiological understanding of glucose tolerance: minimal-model approach. Diabetes. 1989;38(12):1512-1527.
- Miles PD, Levisetti M, Reichart D, Khoursheed M, Moossa A, Olefsky JM. Kinetics of insulin action in vivo: identification of rate-limiting steps. Diabetes. 1995;44(8):947-953.
- Yang YJ, Hope ID, Ader M, Bergman RN. Insulin transport across capillaries is rate limiting for insulin action in dogs. Journal of Clinical Investigation. 1989;84(5):1620-1628.doi: 10.1172/JCI114339.
- Jansson P-AE, Fowelin JP, Von Schenck HP, Smith UP, Lönnroth PN. Measurement by microdialysis of the insulin concentration in subcutaneous interstitial fluid: importance of the endothelial barrier for insulin. Diabetes. 1993;42(10):1469-1473.
- Pinkney JH, Stehouwer CD, Coppack SW, Yudkin JS. Endothelial dysfunction: cause of the insulin resistance syndrome. Diabetes. 1997;46(Supplement 2):S9-S13.
- Steil GM, Ader M, Moore DM, Rebrin K, Bergman RN. Transendothelial insulin transport is not saturable in vivo. No evidence for a receptor-mediated process. The Journal of clinical investigation. 1996;97(6):1497-1503. doi: 10.1172/JCI118572.
- Hilsted J, Christensen NJ. Dual effect of insulin on plasma volume and transcapillary albumin transport. Diabetologia. 1992;35(2):99-103.
- Nestler JE, Barlascini CO, Tetrault GA, Fratkin MJ, Clore JN, Blackard WG. Increased transcapillary escape rate of albumin in nondiabetic men in response to hyperinsulinemia. Diabetes. 1990;39(10):1212-1217.
- Barrett E, Eggleston E, Inyard A, Wang H, Li G, Chai W, et al. The vascular actions of insulin control its delivery to muscle and regulate the rate-limiting step in skeletal muscle insulin action. Diabetologia. 2009;52(5):752-764. doi: 10.1007/s00125-009-1313-z.
- Clerk LH, Vincent MA, Jahn LA, Liu Z, Lindner JR, Barrett EJ. Obesity blunts insulin-mediated microvascular recruitment in human forearm muscle. Diabetes. 2006;55(5):1436-1442.
- Sjostrand M, Gudbjornsdottir S, Strindberg L, Lonnroth P. Delayed transcapillary delivery of insulin to muscle interstitial fluid after oral glucose load in obese subjects. Diabetes. 2005;54(1):152-157.
- Holmang A, Muller M, Andersson OK, Lonnroth P. Minimal influence of blood flow on interstitial glucose and lactate-normal and insulin-resistant muscle. The American journal of physiology. 1998;274(3 Pt 1):E446-E452.
- Meyer J, Lindbom L, Intaglietta M. Coordinated diameter oscillations at arteriolar bifurcations in skeletal muscle. American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology. 1987;253(3):H568-H573.
- Bonadonna RC, Saccomani MP, Del Prato S, Bonora E, DeFronzo RA, Cobelli C. Role of tissue-specific blood flow and tissue recruitment in insulin-mediated glucose uptake of human skeletal muscle. Circulation. 1998;98(3):234-241.
- Eggleston EM, Jahn LA, Barrett EJ. Hyperinsulinemia Rapidly Increases Human Muscle Microvascular Perfusion but Fails to Increase Muscle Insulin Clearance Evidence That a Saturable Process Mediates Muscle Insulin Uptake. Diabetes. 2007;56(12):2958-2963. DOI:10.2337/db07-0670.
- Hamilton-Wessler M, Ader M, Dea MK, Moore D, Loftager M, Markussen J, et al. Mode of transcapillary transport of insulin and insulin analog NN304 in dog hindlimb: evidence for passive diffusion. Diabetes. 2002;51(3):574-582.
- Gerritzen F. The classification of various insulins. British medical journal. 1953;2(4844):1030-1031.
- Myers SR, Yakubu-Madus FE, Johnson WT, Baker JE, Cusick TS, Williams VK, et al. Acylation of human insulin with palmitic acid extends the time action of human insulin in diabetic dogs. Diabetes. 1997;46(4):637-642.
- Azerad E. [Biochemistry of insulin (structure, synthesis, antigenicity, circulating forms, inhibitory antagonists)]. Pathologie et biologie. 1965;13(21):1103-17.
- Crowfoot D. X-ray single crystal photographs of insulin. Nature. 1935;135:591-592. doi:10.1038/135591a0
- Blundell TL, Cutfield JF, Cutfield SM, Dodson EJ, Dodson GG, Hodgkin DC, et al. Three-dimensional atomic structure of insulin and its relationship to activity. Diabetes. 1972;21(2 Suppl):492-505.
- Wang H, Wang AX, Liu Z, Barrett EJ. Insulin signaling stimulates insulin transport by bovine aortic endothelial cells. Diabetes. 2008;57(3):540-547. DOI:10.2337/db07-0967.
- Mehta D, Malik AB. Signaling mechanisms regulating endothelial permeability. Physiological reviews. 2006;86(1):279-367. DOI:10.1152/physrev.00012.2005.
- McRoberts JA, Aranda R, Riley N, Kang H. Insulin regulates the paracellular permeability of cultured intestinal epithelial cell monolayers. Journal of Clinical Investigation. 1990;85(4):1127-1134. doi: 10.1172/JCI114544
- Oh P, McIntosh DP, Schnitzer JE. Dynamin at the neck of caveolae mediates their budding to form transport vesicles by GTP-driven fission from the plasma membrane of endothelium. The Journal of cell biology. 1998;141(1):101-114.
- Wang H, Wang AX, Aylor K, Barrett EJ. Caveolin-1 phosphorylation regulates vascular endothelial insulin uptake and is impaired by insulin resistance in rats. Diabetologia. 2015;58(6):1344-1353. doi: 10.1007/s00125-015-3546-3.
- Fagerholm S, Ortegren U, Karlsson M, Ruishalme I, Stralfors P. Rapid insulin-dependent endocytosis of the insulin receptor by caveolae in primary adipocytes. PloS one. 2009;4(6):e5985. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0005985.
- Wang H, Wang AX, Barrett EJ. Insulin-induced endothelial cell cortical actin filament remodeling: a requirement for trans-endothelial insulin transport. Molecular endocrinology. 2012;26(8):1327-1338. doi: 10.1210/me.2012-1003.
- McCarthy AM, Spisak KO, Brozinick JT, Elmendorf JS. Loss of cortical actin filaments in insulin-resistant skeletal muscle cells impairs GLUT4 vesicle trafficking and glucose transport. American journal of physiology Cell physiology. 2006;291(5):C860-C868. DOI: 10.1152/ajpcell.00107.2006.
- Bottaro DP, Bonner-Weir S, King GL. Insulin receptor recycling in vascular endothelial cells. Regulation by insulin and phorbol ester. The Journal of biological chemistry. 1989;264(10):5916-5923.
- Kaiser N, Vlodavsky I, Tur-Sinai A, Fuks Z, Cerasi E. Binding, internalization, and degradation of insulin in vascular endothelial cells. Diabetes. 1982;31(12):1077-1083.
- Sodoyez JC, Sodoyez-Goffaux FR, Moris YM. 125I-insulin: kinetics of interaction with its receptors and rate of degradation in vivo. The American journal of physiology. 1980;239(1):E3-E8.
- Zeleznik AJ, Roth J. Demonstration of the insulin receptor in vivo in rabbits and its possible role as a reservoir for the plasma hormone. The Journal of clinical investigation. 1978;61(5):1363-1374. doi: 10.1172/JCI109054.
- Genders AJ, Frison V, Abramson SR, Barrett EJ. Endothelial cells actively concentrate insulin during its transendothelial transport. Microcirculation. 2013;20(5):434-439. doi: 10.1111/micc.12044.
- Araki E, Lipes MA, Patti ME, Bruning JC, Haag B, 3rd, Johnson RS, et al. Alternative pathway of insulin signalling in mice with targeted disruption of the IRS-1 gene. Nature. 1994;372(6502):186-190.DOI: 10.1038/372186a0
- Wang H, Liu Z, Li G, Barrett EJ. The vascular endothelial cell mediates insulin transport into skeletal muscle. American journal of physiology Endocrinology and metabolism. 2006;291(2):E323-E332.
- King GL, Johnson SM. Receptor-mediated transport of insulin across endothelial cells. Science. 1985;227(4694):1583-1586.


