Key Words: Concentrations; Agronomic Characters; Genotypes; Mutagenic Treatments;
Induced mutation has been established as an important tool for improvement of certain traits in the existing germplasm. Mutations are of two type viz., natural and artificial or induced mutation. Frequency of natural mutation is very low and hence, artificial mutation with application of mutagens is followed to get better genetic variability. Various types’ of chemicals capable of inducing mutation in plants had been found out. They are Ethyl Methane Sulphonate (EMS), Methyl Methane Sulphonate (MMS), diethylsulphate (DES), Ethylene Imine (EI), Hydroxyl Amine(HA), n-nitroso-n-ethyl urea (NEU), Nitrous Acid(NA), sulphur mustard, 5-bromouracil, Sodium Azide (SA) etc. [5].
Considerable progress has been made on induce mutations of okro [Abelmoskhusesulentus (L.)Moench] for improvement of their certain characters, but detailed studies are lacking. Traits like germination, pollen sterility, plant length, fruit length, survival to maturity and mortality are much affected by mutagenic treatment. Therefore, an attempt has been made to study the effect of mutagenic treatment on agronomic characters of okro. Induced mutations have recently become the subject of biotechnology and molecular investigation leading to description of the structure and function of related genes. Induced mutation in plant is an effective tool for crop improvement [1].
The mutagenic effects of sodium azide have been documented in previous reports. [6] Reported that sodium azide is a very potent mutagen in barley and induced chlorophyll deficiency as well as a wide range of morphological and physiological mutants and [3] reported that gamma ray mutagenesis can be expected to yield severe phenotypic high proportion of useful mutations with normal yielding properties. In plant cells; the nucleus is considered the principal site of damage by ionizing radiation [1].
S/No |
Genotypes |
Description |
Source |
1 |
Beru |
Local variety |
Local market |
2 |
Jokoso |
Improved variety |
Institute of Agricultural Research, Zaria |
3 |
NHAe47-4 |
Improved variety |
Institute of Agricultural Research, Zaria |
Variety length |
Seedling Height |
Stem Height |
Leave length |
Fruit |
Beru |
0.376808 |
1.066381 |
1.023216 |
0.309004 |
Jokoso |
1.408269 |
0.369527 |
0.093874 |
-0.14275 |
NHAe47-4 |
-0.03261 |
2.652084 |
2.389943* |
4.834658* |
It was estimated that for all the three varieties, germination % ranges from 80% to 95% observed at 1Mm to 4mM of sodiumazide and 20% to 75% at 20 to 100kR of gamma rays. (Tables 2-4). The impact and tolerance of the biological material to the mutagens were marked in all the three varieties in terms of germination and seedling survival. This observation remained in parity with [11, 1, 5]. In this investigation, germination percentage, seedling height, average plant height, leaf length and fruit length decreases with increasing dose/concentration (Table 2- 4) and the viable mutants observed could be used as a dependable measure of genetic effect of mutagen. The maximum viable mutants were observed in chemical mutagen (sodium azide) while, minimum in physical mutagen (Gamma rays) shown in (Table 2-4). Similar results were also reported by [7, 4] in okro.
The seedling height, average plant height, leaf length and fruit length in different treatments showed significant reductions in the higher doses of the mutagens. The results revealed that the most efficient concentration for inducing mutations in the three varieties using sodium azide is 1, 2 and 3 Mm and 20, 40 and 60 kR for gamma rays. [8] Reported that the effectively of gamma rays induced mutations in okro cv. selection 2-2 with gamma irradiation ranges between 10 to 60 kR. Also [1] reported that Mutagen (0.80 kR. and 0.20 %) significantly produced more branches, more buds and number of fruits/plants than the control plants. [2] Reported similar results in Trigonellafoenumfraeum.
Mutagen |
Percentage (%)Germination |
Seedling Height |
Stem Height at Maturity |
Leaf Length |
Fruit Length |
Control |
97a |
9.5a |
28.00a |
10.50a |
5.60a |
Gamma Ray |
65a |
8.5b |
25.17a |
8.92a |
4.80a |
Gamma Ray |
75a |
8.6b |
21.13b |
6.25b |
4.90a |
Gamma Ray |
75a |
7.2b |
14.67c |
6.50b |
4.36a |
Gamma Ray |
50b |
4.8c |
5.67d |
1.92c |
- |
SodiumAzide 1.0 |
96a |
7.4b |
- |
- |
- |
SodiumAzide 2.0 |
95a |
9.8a |
12.75c |
5.80b |
6.00a |
Sodium Azide 3.0 |
95a |
2.4d |
13.25c |
5.40b |
3.83b |
Sodium Azide 4.0 |
90a |
6.5c |
10.50c |
5.90b |
3.50b |
Mutagen |
Percentage (%)Germination |
Seedling Height |
Stem Height at Maturity |
Leaf Length |
Fruit Length |
Control |
96a |
6.70a |
21.00a |
10.00a |
7.60a |
Gamma Ray |
40b |
6.8a |
14.80b |
8.42a |
6.0b |
Gamma Ray |
55a |
6.4a |
11.91b |
6.25b |
3.25d |
Gamma Ray |
40b |
6.4a |
9.67c |
4.67c |
- |
Gamma Ray |
20b |
2.7b |
Died |
- |
- |
SodiumAzide 1.0 |
85a |
5.2b |
12.17b |
5.40b |
5.50b |
SodiumAzide 2.0 |
85a |
3.8b |
9.17c |
6.40b |
4.30c |
Sodium Azide 3.0 |
80a |
5.2b |
14.00b |
9.50a |
5.13b |
Sodium Azide 4.0 |
80a |
2.8b |
11.00c |
5.60b |
4.50c |
Mutagen |
Percentage (%)Germination |
Seedling Height |
Stem Height at Maturity |
Leaf Length |
Fruit Length |
Control |
95a |
9.10b |
24.00a |
9.80a |
5.70a |
Gamma Ray |
40b |
6.50d |
21.75b |
9.83a |
5.70a |
Gamma Ray |
50a |
5.40e |
16.33c |
6.83b |
5.30a |
Gamma Ray |
65a |
5.60d |
11.83d |
8.58a |
4.75a |
Gamma Ray |
35b |
3.70f |
5.00f |
- |
- |
SodiumAzide 1.0 |
95a |
4.90e |
9.50e |
3.80c |
3.50b |
SodiumAzide 2.0 |
95a |
11.00a |
9.25e |
4.70c |
3.63b |
Sodium Azide 3.0 |
80a |
2.80f |
8.50e |
3.40c |
3.00b |
Sodium Azide 4.0 |
80a |
2.00g |
- |
- |
- |
None of the mutants performed better than the control except in Beru variety where 2Mm of sodium Azide produces longer seedling height and fruit length (9.8cm and 6.0cm respectively). Hence the doses and concentrations of the mutagens induce variable mutations on the Okro varieties used in this research.
- Ashish R., Nandkishor H R, and Prashant W. Effect of Sodium Azide and Gamma Rays Treatments on Percentage Germination, Survival, Morphological Variation and Chlorophyll Mutation in Musk Okro (AbelmoschusMoschatus L.). International Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2011;3(5): ISSN- 0975-1491.
- Biswas AK, Datta AK. Induced mutation in two Trigonella species. Banglad J. Bot. 1988;17:211-214
- Froicer K. Aspects of the agriculture value of certain barley x-ray mutations produced and tested at the Swedish Seed Association, Svalof, and its branch stations. Acta Agric. Scand. 1954;4:515-517.
- Ghai T R, Singh M, Arora S K. Induced variability for economic characters in okro. J. Res. Punjab Agric. Univ. 2004;41:63-67.
- Jadhav P A, Kalpande H V, Kathale M N, Dahale G P. Effect of gamma rays and ethyl methane sulphonate on germination, pollen viability and survival of okro [Abelmoschusesculentus (L.) Moench]. Journal of Crop and Weed. 2012;8(2):130-131.
- Kleinhofs AW, Owais M, Nilan RA. Azide. Mutation Research. 1978;55:165-195.
- Kumar A, Mishra M N. Effect of gamma rays EMS and NMU on germination, seedlingvigour, pollen viability and plant survival in M1 and M2 generations of okro. Adv. Pl. Sci. 2004;17:295-97.
- Malani S S, Kale P B, Gonge V S. Effectivity of gamma rays induced mutations in okro. PKV Res. J. 1993;17:1-5.
- Mensah JK, Akomeah PA, Ekpekurede EO. Gamma irradiation induced variation of yield parameters in cowpea (Vignaunguiculata (L.) Walp.) Global J. Pure Appl. Sci. 2005;11(3):327-330.
- Mensah JK, Akomeah PA. Mutagenic effects of hydroxylamine and streptomycin on the growth and seed yield of the cowpea, Vigna Unguiculata (L.) Walp. Legume Res. 1997;15:39-44.
- Singh A K, Singh K P (2000). Seedling injury, reduced pollen and ovule fertility and chlorophyll mutations induced by gamma rays and EMS in okro. Veg. Sci., 27: 42-44.


