2Department of Theriogenology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Cairo University, P.O. 12515, Giza, Egypt
33Royal Oman Police, Mounted Division, Veterinary Section, Muscat, Oman
44Division of Reproduction, Laboratories and Animal Research Centre, Directorate General of Veterinary Services, Royal Court Affairs, P.O. Box 64, P.C. 111, Muscat, Oman
Keywords: Arabian horse; Semen; Extenders; Cryopreservation; Fertilizing capacity
Many diluents have been used in different animal species, with good results in post thaw sperm motility, but they have not been used with the semen of Arabian horses. Several diluents have been used in stallion semen, with good results such as Kenney’s diluent, cream-gel, skim milk diluent, glycine egg yolk, sugar-based extender and INRA 96 extender [12,13]. The use of Computer- Assisted Semen Analysis (CASA), which facilitates objective measurement of several parameters of sperm motility, offers a more reliable and repeatable means of assessing sperm motility than does examination by eye [14]. The CASA system is therefore able to determine a series of variables, including number of moving spermatozoa, Curvilinear Velocity (VCL), Linear Velocity (VSL), Linear Coefficient (LIN), straightness coefficient (STR) and frequency of head displacement (BCF) [15].
Success with frozen semen requires attention to detail and a basic understanding of the techniques involved in the proper handling, thawing, and insemination of frozen semen [7]. Frozen stallion semen is now used more extensively by minimizing freeze thaw damage to spermatozoa, and indeed, more stallions might be used and pregnancy rates might be increased. Many steps constitute interactive participation in the success of the cryopreservation process, including semen collection, dilution, cooling, freezing, and thawing [12].Common practice aims to inseminate the mare with frozen semen 6–12 h pre ovulation and 6 h post-ovulation. On one hand, insemination post ovulation requires examination of the mare at least every 6 h, with the artificial insemination performed as soon as ovulation has been detected; this can be a very labor-intensive system [16-18]. On the other hand, insemination pre ovulation may result in wastage of expensive semen if the mare fails to ovulate within the expected time frame [19].
The present study was designed to evaluate the impact of diluents on semen processing, on postthaw progressive sperm motility, and on the fertilizing capacity of cryopreserved Arabian horse semen.
VI= Σ [M x (T - R/2)]
Where, VI is the viability index, Σ is a sign for the sum total, M is the percentage of sperm motility, T is the time of the next determination of motility, and R is the time of the previous determination of motility. The best extender with best thawing temperature and viability index was used for artificial insemination of Arabian mares, which was INRA Freeze, with a thawing temperature of 37°C for 30 sec.
The mares were divided into two groups: one group was inseminated with frozen-thawed semen diluted in INRA Freeze at a rate of 1:1 and the other, at a rate of 1:2; all straws were thawed at 37°C for 30 sec. Every attempt was made to breed the mares within 6 h before ovulation and for some of them, to breed by two doses: one before and one 24 h after ovulation. Mares that had good estrous signs with marked uterine edema and a dominant follicle >35 mm but that did not ovulate were given 2500 IU I/V of human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG; Chorulon, Intervet UK Limited, Milton Keynes, United Kingdom) and bred at 24 h and 40 h after hCG administration. At the time of insemination, a sterile, flexible pipette was advanced vaginally past the cervix and semen deposited at the body of the uterus. Volumes of 0.5 - 5 ml of thawed semen with a minimum number of 300 million progressively motile and morphologically normal sperm were inseminated using air to flush the pipette [24]. All inseminated mares were examined for pregnancy at day 18 via ultrasonography and the conception rates were recorded.
The characteristics of the stallions’ sperm motility at 5°C such as VAP (μm/s), VSL (μm/s), VCL (μm/s), and ALH (μm) were significantly (P < 0.01) the best by using INRA 96 extender at rates of dilution of 1:1 (155.53±4.45, 108.81 ± 3.84, 302.32 ± 6.96, and 14.26 ± 0.28, respectively) and 1:2 (161.95 ± 4.73, 118.23 ± 4.81, 316.44 ± 8.15, and 14.89 ± 0.32, respectively) in comparison with the other two extenders used (TRIS -egg yolk and E-Z Mixin; Table 3). Table 4 shows that the percentage of stallions’ sperm’s progressive motility after thawing at 37°C for
Semen parameters |
Values |
Ejaculate volume (mL) |
60.00 ± 3.34 |
Overall motility (%) |
88.54 ± 2.42 |
Progressive motility (%) |
54.79 ± 2.32 |
Sperm cell concentration (x106/ mL) |
178.63 ± 19.47 |
Live sperm (%) |
69.75 ± 1.64 |
Sperm cell abnormalities (%) |
23.46 ± 1.46 |
As shown in Table 6, the percentages of stallions’ sperm’s progressive motility after thawing at 75°C for 7 sec are significantly (P < 0.01) higher for INRA Freeze and E-Z Mixin extenders at rates of dilution of 1:1 and 1:2 (23.55 ± 1.92 and 21.09 ± 1.79, respectively for INRA Freeze, 19.40 ± 1.07 and 20.17 ± 0.84, respectively for E-Z Mixin extenders) than in the TRIS -egg yolk extender. The characteristics of sperm motility after thawing at 75°C for 7 sec such as VAP (μm/s) and VSL (μm/s) are significantly (P < 0.01) the fastest by using INRA Freeze extender at a rate of dilution of 1:2 (107.06 ± 3.71 89 and 83.96 ± 3.47, respectively) in comparison with INRA Freeze at a dilution rate of 1:1, TRIS -egg yolk and E-Z Mixin extenders (Table 7). Table 8 shows the fertilizing capacity of preserved Arabian horse semen in the INRA Freeze extender and thawed at 37°C for 30 sec. The conception rate is significantly higher (P < 0.01) by using INRA Freeze extender at a dilution rate of 1:1 (50%) than it is at 1:2 (20%), with total conception of 35% (Table 8). The effect of a number of inseminating doses on the fertilizing capacity of the cryopreserved Arabian horse semen in INRA Freeze extender and thawing at 37°C for 30 sec is shown in Table 9. The use of two inseminating doses gives significantly (P < 0.01) better results (50%) than does the use of one inseminating dose (28.57%; Table 9).
Extenders |
Overall motility (%) |
Progressive motility (%) |
Concentration(x106/mL) |
Live sperm (%) |
Sperm abnormalities (%)
|
INRA 96 1:1 |
94.08a ± 1.30 |
39.54a ± 2.50 |
57.00a ± 6.50 |
63.68a ± 1.54 |
18.42a ± 2.26 |
INRA 96 1:2 |
91.71a ± 0.95 |
44.13a ± 3.07 |
49.00a ± 5.59 |
67.22a ± 1.36 |
27.33b ± 1.18 |
Tris-egg yolk 1:1 |
85.13bf ± 2.87 |
19.00b ± 0.87 |
81.76b ± 4.90 |
45.32b ± 1.16 |
23.21c ± 0.42 |
Tris-egg yolk 1:2 |
76.00de ± 2.72 |
16.04c ± 0.80 |
81.77b ± 5.91 |
41.18b ± 0.82 |
21.08d ± 0.26 |
E-Z mixin 1:1 |
85.96bd ± 1.16 |
33.83d ± 1.16 |
51.97a ± 2.51 |
67.40a ± 1.55 |
25.35bce ± 1.08 |
E-Z mixin 1:2 |
78.88ef ± 1.90 |
31.00d ± 1.53 |
79.04b ± 5.92 |
44.56b ± 2.28 |
24.60e ± 0.42 |
Number of ejaculates = 48
Extenders |
Path velocity (VAP) µm/s |
Progressive velocity (VSL) µm/s
|
Track speed (VCL) µm/s |
Lateral amplitude head (ALH) µm |
Beat cross frequency (BCF) Hz |
Straightness (STR) (%) |
Linearity (LIN) (%) |
INRA 96 1:1 |
155.53a ± 4.45 |
108.81a ± 3.84 |
302.32a ± 6.96 |
14.26a ± 0.28 |
25.85a ± 0.71 |
66.29ab ± 1.29 |
34.48ab ± 0.67 |
INRA 96 1:2 |
161.95a ± 4.73 |
118.23a ± 4.81 |
316.44a ± 8.15 |
14.89a ± 0.32 |
27.36a ± 0.81 |
69.53b ± 1.50 |
36.31b ± 1.04 |
Tris-egg yolk 1:1 |
103.04b ± 3.97 |
64.70b ± 1.94 |
197.10b ± 6.65 |
10.90b ± 0.19 |
27.30a ± 0.69 |
58.64c ± 0.80 |
31.14c ± 0.27 |
Tris-egg yolk 1:2 |
88.44c ± 2.54 |
57.07c ± 1.46 |
177.48c ± 4.90 |
11.09b ± 0.17 |
29.58b ± 0.68 |
59.80d ± 0.61 |
30.47d ± 0.27 |
E-Z mixin 1:1 |
127.31d ± 2.15 |
92.13d ± 2.19 |
251.93d ± 3.13 |
12.84c ± 0.07 |
34.13c ± 0.28 |
65.75a ± 0.60 |
33.25ae ± 0.45 |
E-Z mixin 1:2 |
128.69d ± 3.60 |
92.74d ± 3.32 |
254.96d ± 6.19 |
12.81c ± 0.12 |
33.17d ± 0.28 |
65.00a ± 0.80 |
33.14ae ± 0.54 |
Number of ejaculates = 48
Extenders |
Overall motility (%) |
Progressive motility (%) |
Concentration (x106/mL) |
Live sperm (%) |
Sperm abnormalities (%) |
Viability Index Overall motility |
Viability Index Progressive motility |
INRA Freeze 1:1 |
64.67a ± 3.27 |
22.75acd ± 2.36 |
58.77a ± 3.63 |
30.86a ± 1.82 |
21.57a ± 1.07 |
135.42a ± 14.06 |
50.92a ± 5.71 |
INRA Freeze 1:2 |
60.00ab ± 3.38 |
28.10a ± 2.00 |
52.04a ± 3.59 |
29.43a ± 1.03 |
31.43b ± 1.26 |
147.42b ± 15.78 |
68.83b ± 6.77 |
Tris-egg yolk 1:1 |
60.80ad ± 3.29 |
13.00b ± 0.66 |
74.10b ± 2.55 |
22.00b ± 0.23 |
27.00c ± 0.34 |
97.67ce ± 14.79 |
17.58c ± 3.04 |
Tris-egg yolk 1:2 |
47.10c ± 2.39 |
12.40b ± 0.51 |
83.03c ± 3.23 |
22.50b ± 1.11 |
25.50d ± 0.34 |
72.83d ± 15.70 |
12.25d ± 2.99 |
E-Z mixin 1:1 |
55.00bd ± 1.97 |
17.83c ± 0.76 |
70.93b ± 3.42 |
27.60a ± 0.95 |
28.00bce ± 0.92 |
106.25c ± 10.83 |
47.75e ± 4.89 |
E-Z mixin 1:2 |
53.00bcd ± 2.47 |
22.67d ± 1.10 |
62.88a ± 3.63 |
21.00b ± 1.05 |
27.80e ± 0.36 |
94.25e ± 13.11 |
36.16f ± 3.90 |
Number of ejaculates = 48
Extenders |
Path velocity (VAP) µm/s |
Progressive velocity (VSL) µm/s |
Track speed (VCL) µm/s |
Lateral amplitude head (ALH) µm |
Beat cross frequency (BCF) Hz |
Straightness (STR) (%) |
Linearity (LIN) (%) |
INRA Freeze 1:1 |
94.85ad ± 4.34 |
71.15ae ± 3.96 |
184.54ae ± 6.77 |
11.25ad ± 0.17 |
34.21a ± 0.39 |
67.18a ± 0.87 |
35.36ad ± 0.82 |
INRA Freeze 1:2 |
113.19b ± 3.49 |
89.87b ± 3.47 |
214.62b ± 5.36 |
11.57a ± 0.17 |
34.12a ± 0.38 |
71.22c ± 0.91 |
38.33b ± 0.79 |
Tris-egg yolk 1:1 |
63.20c ± 1.61 |
43.17c ± 1.03 |
125.46c ± 3.50 |
9.7b ± 0.17 |
29.78b ± 0.24 |
66.56ab ± 1.16 |
37.00ab ± 1.19 |
Tris-egg yolk 1:2 |
65.07c ± 1.19 |
45.64d ± 0.88 |
133.94d ± 2.72 |
9.47b ± 0.18 |
31.58c ± 0.24 |
65.89ad ± 0.46 |
34.11d ± 0.64 |
E-Z mixin 1:1 |
83.48d ± 1.86 |
61.47e ± 1.79 |
170.12e ± 2.95 |
10.27c ± 0.18 |
38.75d ± 0.08 |
64.50bd ± 0.53 |
32.00c ± 0.43 |
E-Z mixin 1:2 |
89.18a ± 2.57 |
67.25a ± 2.21 |
179.10a ± 7.80 |
10.70d ± 0.24 |
36.08e ± 0.23 |
66.50a ± 0.59 |
33.67d ± 0.34 |
Number of ejaculates = 48
Extenders |
Overall motility (%) |
Progressive motility (%) |
Concentration (x106/mL) |
Live sperm (%) |
Sperm abnormalities (%) |
Viability Index Overall motility |
Viability Index Progressive motility |
INRA Freeze 1:1 |
6 2 . 00a ± 3. 94 |
23.55a ± 1.92 |
64.83abc ± 6.05 |
16.43ab ± 1.25 |
28.00ad± 0.88 |
142.17a ± 9.54 |
67.25a ± 3.39 |
INRA Freeze 1:2 |
49 . 36cd ± 3.14 |
21.09b ± 1.79 |
70.46a ± 5.32 |
15.33b ± 0.66 |
35.17b ± 1.59 |
102.92b ± 4.33 |
49.75b ± 2.21 |
Tris-egg yolk 1:1 |
62.88a ± 4.77 |
13.00c ± 0.65 |
69.70ab ± 2.55 |
28.00c ± 0.67 |
25.50c ± 0.38 |
107.92bd ± 3.41 |
19.42c ± 1.78 |
Tris-egg yolk 1:2 |
47.38c ± 3.46 |
10.50d ± 0.45 |
70.00ab ± 2.83 |
17.25a ± 0.61 |
26.75d ± 0.70 |
84.33c ± 8.86 |
14.83d ± 0.98 |
E-Z mixin 1:1 |
57.08ad ± 5.77 |
19.40a ± 1.07 |
55.78c ± 1.52 |
24.60d ± 0.78 |
21.20e ± 0.53 |
92.50c ± 7.26 |
41.75e ± 3.43 |
E-Z mixin 1:2 |
47.50bc ± 3.38 |
20.17a ± 0.84 |
71.39ab ± 4.02 |
18.60a ± 0.97 |
28.40a ± 0.64 |
113.75d ± 3.58 |
41.50e ± 3.96 |
Number of ejaculates = 48
Extenders |
Path velocity (VAP) µm/s |
Progressive velocity (VSL) µm/s |
Track speed (VCL) µm/s |
Lateral amplitude head (ALH) µm |
Beat cross frequency (BCF) Hz |
Straightness (STR) (%) |
Linearity (LIN) (%) |
INRA Freeze 1:1 |
100.40a ± 2.97 |
74.54a ± 2.86 |
194.62ad ± 10.01 |
11.20a ± 0.16 |
33.26a ± 0.29 |
66.20a ± 0.86 |
34.70a ± 0.61 |
INRA Freeze 1:2 |
107.06c ± 3.71 |
83.96c ± 3.47 |
208.89b ± 11.09 |
11.82b ± 0.19 |
34.83be ± 0.52 |
69.80c± 0.92 |
35.70b ± 0.64 |
Tris-egg yolk 1:1 |
69.17b ± 1.44 |
46.39b ± 0.71 |
140.51c ± 7.91 |
9.76c ± 0.08 |
30.69c ± 0.24 |
64.43bd± 0.74 |
33.29a ± 0.60 |
Tris-egg yolk 1:2 |
68.79b ± 1.57 |
48.23b ± 1.37 |
141.20c ± 8.40 |
10.01d ± 0.08 |
30.64c ± 0.21 |
67.14a± 0.92 |
35.43ab ± 1.02 |
E-Z mixin 1:1 |
95.94ad ± 1.16 |
71.74a ± 0.96 |
194.96ab ± 6.76 |
12.88e ± 0.07 |
38.04d ± 0.14 |
64.00d± 0.35 |
31.60c ± 0.28 |
E-Z mixin 1:2 |
92.07d ± 2.65 |
69.42a ± 2.55 |
183.83d ± 9.56 |
11.40ab ± 0.26 |
35.95e ± 0.19 |
66.16ab± 0.65 |
33.50a ± 0.35 |
Number of ejaculates = 48
Dilution rate with INRA 96 |
Number of inseminated mares |
Number of conceived mares |
Conception rate |
1:1 |
20 |
10 |
50%a |
1:2 |
20 |
4 |
20%b |
Total |
40 |
14 |
35%c |
Dilution rate with INRA 96 (1:1 + 1:2) |
Number of inseminated mares |
Number of conceived mares |
Conception rate |
One dose insemination |
28 |
8 |
28.57%a |
Two doses insemination |
12 |
6 |
50%b |
Total |
40 |
14 |
35%c |
In the current study, stallions’ sperm’s progressive motility (28.10 ± 2.00%) and viability indexes after thawing at 37°C for 30 sec were better by using INRA Freeze extender than for TRIS -egg yolk and E-Z Mixin extenders. INRA 96 extender is one of the best chemically defined media used for frozen semen processing in stallions [4,42]. However, the motilities of frozen -thawed semen processed in modified Tyrode’s solution and mTALP medium as determined by CASA are 43.4% for Tori stallions and 42.3% for Estonian stallions [43]. In addition, TRIS was the best extender for cryopreservation of stallion semen [44]. TRIS -egg yolk based extenders provide higher total and progressive motilities, higher percentages of rapid sperm and intact membrane cells, and more efficiency with regard to preservation of bovine post thaw sperm viability and fertility [45]. Components of extenders that include egg yolk serve to prevent cold shock and provide membrane stabilization during the freeze-thawing process [46]. The stabilization of sperm membranes has an important role in improvement of post thawed sperm quality [47,48]. In boars, TRIX cell (IMV Technologies) is the best for long-term storage [49].
The stallions’ sperm’s progressive motility percentages after thawing at 75°C for 7 sec were higher by using INRA Freeza and E-Z Mixin extenders than was the TRIS -egg yolk extender.
In the motility of stallion spermatozoa after cryopreservation, there is a highly significant (P < 0.0001) difference between INRA Freeza extender (48.9%) and E-Z Mixin extender (38.6%). The combination of INRA 96 and 4% glycerol in a freezing medium gave the highest average post-thaw motility (51.5%) [50]. Thawing of stallion semen preserved in extender INRA Freeza at 37°C for 30 sec is more favorable. Thawing at 75°C for 7 sec slightly increased motility after 120 min at 37°C but it had no effect on per-cycle fertility [8].
The stallions’ sperm motility characteristics such as VAP (μm/s) and VSL (μm/s) after thawing at both 37°C for 30 sec and 75°C for 7 sec are significantly (P < 0.01) the highest by using INRA Freeza extender when compared with TRIS -egg yolk and E-Z Mixin extenders. On the contrary, no correlations have been detected between fertility and motility immediately after thawing. CASA has replaced light microscopy in the evaluation of frozen -thawed stallion sperm, but so far, no one has been able to demonstrate a correlation between the fertility of frozen stallion semen and any of the motility parameters obtained by those instruments [51].
In this study, the conception rate was higher by using INRA Freeza extender (thawed at 37°C for 30 sec) at a dilution rate of 1:1 (50%) than it was at a dilution rate of 1:2 (20%), with total conception of 35%. In the same direction, INRA 96 extender supplemented with egg yolk and glycerol significantly improved per-cycle pregnancy rates in mares compared with INRA Freeza extender (71% versus 40%, P < 0.01) [52]. The conception rate of frozen -thawed stallion semen ranged from 49.4 to 53.5% [53]. The use of two inseminating doses of frozen stallion semen gave better results (50%) than did the use of one inseminating dose (28.57%). Nevertheless, no differences were observed in pregnancy rates for mares inseminated once or multiple times in a given cycle (51.5% versus 51.7% for study one and 47.1% versus 46.1% for study two). Mares inseminated twice in a cycle, once before ovulation and once after ovulation, become pregnant at a rate similar to that of mares inseminated once within 6 h postovulation (48.1% versus 47.3%) [54]. Acceptable fertility with frozen stallion semen is possible with the use of good quality semen, with a specific selection of mares and stallions, and with good mare management [53,55]. In conclusion, the fertilizing capacity of cryopreserved Arabian horse semen was best by using INRA Freeza extender at a dilution rate of 1:1 and in two insemination doses.
The authors confirm that the manuscript has been read and approved by all named authors and that there are no other persons who satisfied the criteria for authorship but are not listed. We further confirm that the order of authors listed in the manuscript has been approved by all of us.
- Stout EAT. Equine embryo transfer: review of developing potential. Equine Vet J. 2006;38:467-478.
- Kraemer DC. A History of Equine Embryo Transfer and Related Technologies. J Equine Vet Sci. 2013;33:305-308.
- Pycock JF. Artificial insemination. Proceedings of the 10th International Congress of World Equine Veterinary Association, Russia: Moscow; 2008.
- Barbacini S. Frozen semen processing and quality control. Proceedings of the 12th International Congress of World Equine Veterinary Association WEVA, Hyderabad, India; 2011.
- Samper JC, Vidament M, Katila T, Newcombe J, Estrada A, Sargeant J. Analysis of some factors associated with pregnancy rates of frozen semen: A multi-centre study. Theriogenology. 2002;58:647-50.
- Alvarenga MA, Papa FO, Landim-Alvarenga FC, Medeiros ASL. Amides as cryoprotectants for freezing stallion semen. Anim Reprod Sci. 2005;89:105-13.
- Vidament M, Dupere AM, Julienne P, Evain A, Noue P, Palmer E. Equine frozen semen: Freezability and fertility field results. Theriogenology. 1997;48:905-17.
- Vidament M, Yvon JM, Couty I, Arnaud G, Nguekam-Feugang J, Noue P, et al. Advances in cryopreservation of stallion semen in modified INRA82. Anim Reprod Sci. 2001;68:201-18.
- Alvarenga MA, Le˜ao KM, Papa FO, Landim-Alvarenga FC, Medeiros ASL, Gomes GM. The use of alternative cryoprotectors for freezing stallion semen. In: Proceedings of Workshop on Transporting Gametes and Embryos, Havemeyer Foundation; 2003; Brewster, Massachusetts, USA; 2003.p. 74–6.
- Samper JC, Morris CA. Current methods for stallion semen cryopreservation: A survey. Theriogenology. 1998;49:895-903.
- Ranzenigo G, Schulman M, Luther I. Effects of three semen extenders on the motility of frozen-thawed stallion sperm. Veterinary Europian Equine Meeting, Venice, Italy: XIV SIVE CONG; 2008.
- Samper JC. Artificial insemination with fresh and cooled semen In: Samper JC, editor. Equine Breeding Management and Artificial Insemination. Saunders, Elsevier Inc, Missouri; 2009.p. 165-74.
- Pojprasath T, Lohachit C, Techakumphu M, Stout T, Tharasanit T. Improved cryopreservability of stallion sperm using a sorbitol-based freezing extender. Theriogenology 2011;75:1742-9.
- Colenbrander B, Gadella BM, Stout TAE. The predictive value of semen analysis in the evaluation of the stallion fertility. Reprod Domest Anim. 2003; 38:305-11.
- Tejerina F, Morrell J, Petterson J, Dalin AM, Rodriguez-Martinez H. Routine assessment of motility of ejaculated stallion spermatozoa using a novel computer-assisted motility analyzer (Qualisperm™). Anim Reprod. 2009;6:380-85.
- Belling TH. Postovulation breeding and related reproductive phenomena in the mare. Equine Prect. 1984;6:12-9.
- Woods J, Bergfelt DR, Ginther OJ. Effects of time of insemination relative to ovulation on pregnancy rate and embryonic-loss rate in mares. Equine Vet J. 1990;22:410-15.
- Huhtinen M, Koskinen E, Skidmore JA, Allen WR. Recovery rate and quality of embryos from mares inseminated after ovulation. Theriogenology. 1996;45:719-26.
- Shepherd C. Production and use of frozen stallion semen in the UK. Proceedings of the 47th British Equine Veterinary Association Congress BEVA, Liverpool, United Kingdom: 2008.
- Frunza I, Cernescu H, Mircu C, Otava G, Zarcula S, Gabriela Korodi G. Determination of the motility parameters of boar semen with CASA. Faculty of Veterinary Medicine Bucharest, Scientific Works C Series LII; 2007. p. 73-9.
- Blanchard TL, Varner DD, Schumacher J, Love CC, Brinsko SP, Rigby SL. Examination of the stallion for breeding soundness In: Blanchard L, Varner DD, Schumacher J, Love CC, Brinsko SP, Rigby SL, editors. Manual of Equine Reproduction. 2nd ed. MOSBY; Elsevier Inc; Missouri: 2003. p. 142-63.
- Mortimer ST. A critical review of the physiological importance and analysis of sperm movement in mammals. Hum Reprod Update. 1997;3:403-39.
- Milovanov VK, Trubkin GD, Chubenko NS, Tsvetkov IV, Erzin ZK, Meschankin AB. Artificial insemination of livestock in the U.S.S.R. Israel Program For Scientific Translations, Jerusalem; 1964. p. 102-4.
- Sanchez R, Gomez I, Samper JC. Artificial insemination with frozen semen. In: Samper JC, editor. Equine Breeding Management and Artificial Insemination. 2nd ed. Saunders; Elsevier Inc; Missouri: 2009. p. 175-83.
- SPSS Inc. Statistical package for social sciences, version 22.0, for Windows (Microsoft, Redmond, WA), Chicago, IL: 2013.
- Hemeida NA, El–Baghdady YRM, El–Belely MS, Ismail ST, Abou–Ahmed MM. Seminal characteristics of Arab stallions. Proceedings of the 4th Scientific Congress, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Assiut University: 1990. p. 477-87.
- Ball BA, Mohammed HO. Morphometry of stallion spermatozoa by computer – assisted image analysis. Theriogenology. 1995;44:367-77.
- Love CC, Varner DD, Thompson JA. Intra- and inter stallion variation in sperm morphology and their relationship with fertility. J Reprod Fertil Suppl. 2000;56:93-100.
- Sieme H, Bonk A, Hamann H, Klug E, Katila T. Effects of different artificial insemination techniques and sperm doses on fertility of normal mares and mares with abnormal reproductive history. Theriogenology. 2004;62:915-28.
- Waheed MM, Ghoneim IM, Abdou MSS. Morphometric Characteristics of Spermatozoa in the Arabian horse with regard to season, age, sperm concentration, and fertility. J Equine Vet Sci. 2015;35:244–49.
- Gahne S, Gånheim A, Malmgren L. Effect of insemination dose on pregnancy rate in mares. Theriogenology. 1998;49:1071-74.
- Sieme H. Semen evaluation, In: Samper JC, editor. Equine Breeding Management and Artificial Insemination. 2nd ed. Saunders, Elsevier Inc; Missouri: 2009. p. 57-73.
- El–Baghdady YRM, Abou–Ahmed MM, El–Belely MS, Hemeida NA, Ismail ST. Influence of season on seminal characteristics and sexual behavior in Arab horses. Proceedings of the 4th Scientific Congress, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Assiut University: 1990. p. 488-98.
- Oba E, Bicudo SD, Pimentel SL, Lopes RS, Simonetti F, Hunziker RA. Quantitative and qualitative evaluation of stallion semen. Revista Brasileira de Reproduçäo Anim. 1993;17:57-74.
- Dowsett KF, Knott LM. The influence of age and breed on stallion semen. Theriogenology. 1996;46:397-412.
- Pickett BW, Hopwood ML, Faulkner LC. Variation in stallion semen characteristics. J Anim Sci. 1971;33:264.
- Pickett BW, Faulkner LC, Seidel GE Jr, Berndtson WE, Voss JL. Reproductive physiology of the stallion. VI. Seminal and behavioral characteristics. J Anim Sci. 1976;43:617-25.
- Pickett BW. Seasonal variation of stallion semen. Proceedings of the 3rd Technology Conference of Artificial Insemination and Reproduction, Chicago, Ill., USA; 1970. p. 52-7.
- Hendrikse J. The semen of stallions of normal fertility. Tijdschr Diergeneesk. 1966;91:300-13.
- Pinheiro ACS, Pamplona JF, Papa FO, Alvarenga MA. Comparison between three extenders for cooling of stallion semen before freezing. Anim Reprod Sci. 2008;107:340-41.
- Bencharif D, Amirat-Briand L, LeGuillou J, Vialtelle C, Anton M, Schmitt E, et al. Refrigeration of canine sperm at + 4°C: Comparative study of four different extenders for the refrigeration of canine sperm at +4°C: LDL, Tris egg yolk, Equex®, and INRA96®. Revue Méd Vét. 2013;164:252-62.
- Vyt P, Maes D, Quinten C, Rijsselaere T, Deley W, Aarts M, et al. Detailed motility evaluation of boar semen and its predictive value for reproductive performance in sows. Vlaams Diergeneeskundig Tijdschrift. 2008;77:291-98.
- Kavak A, Johannisson A, Lundeheim N, Rodriguez-Martinez H, Aidnik M, Einarsson S. Evaluation of cryopreserved stallion semen from Tori and Estonian breeds using CASA and flow cytometry. Anim Reprod Sci. 2003;76:205-16.
- Samper JC. Evaluation of cryopreserved semen : An alternative assay. Acta Vet Scand Suppl. 1992;88:59-65.
- Crespilho AM, Filho MFSa´, Dell'Aqua Jr JA, Nichi M, Monteiro GA, Avanzi BR, et al. Comparison of in vitro and in vivo fertilizing potential of bovine semen frozen in egg yolk or new lecithin based extenders. Livestock Sci. 2012;149:1-6.
- Emamverdi M, Zhandi M, Zare Shahneh A, Sharafi M, Akhlaghi A, Khodaei Motlagh M, et al. Flow cytometric and microscopic evaluation of post-thawed ram semen cryopreserved in chemically defined home-made or commercial extenders. Anim Prod Sci. 2014;55:551-8.
- Maxwell WMC, Watson PF. Recent progress in the preservation of ram semen. Anim Reprod Sci. 1996;42:55-65.
- Barbas JP, Mascarenhas RD. Cryopreservation of domestic animal sperm cells. Cell and Tissue Banking. 2009;10:49-62.
- Lange-Consiglio A, Meucci A, Cremonesi F. Fluorescent multiple staining and CASA system to assess boar sperm viability and membranes integrity in short and long-term extenders. Open Vet J. 2013;3:21-35.
- Scherzer J, Fayrer-Hosken RA, Aceves M, Hurley DJ, Ray LE, Jones L, Heusner GL. Freezing equine semen: the effect of combinations of semen extenders and glycerol on post-thaw motility. Aust Vet J. 2009;87:275-9.
- Katila T. In Vitro Evaluation of Frozen-Thawed Stallion Semen: A Review. Acta Vet Scand. 2001;42:199-217.
- Pillet E, Batellier F, Duchamp G, Furstoss V, Vern YL, Kerboeuf D, et al. Freezing stallion semen in INRA96® -based extender improves fertility rates in comparison with INRA82. Dairy Sci Technol. 2008;88:257-65.
- Loomis PR. The equine frozen semen industry. Anim Reprod Sci. 2001;68:191-200.
- Loomis PR, Squires EL. Frozen semen management in equine breeding programs. Theriogenology. 2005;64:480-91.
- Camargo CE, Weiss RR, Kozicki LE, Duarte MP, Duarte MCG, Lunelli D, et al. Some factors affecting the rate of pregnancy after embryo transfer derived from the Brazilian Jumper Horse Breed. J Equine Vet Sci. 2013;33:924-9.