Research Article
Open Access
Development and Validation for Simultaneous
Estimation of Proguanil and Atovaquone by
using RP-HPLC
A Lakshmana Rao*1, T Prasanthi1, Fazeela Thunnisa1
Department of Pharmaceutical Analysis, V V Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Gudlavalleru, AP, India.
*Corresponding author: A Lakshmana Rao, Professor & Principal, V V Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Gudlavalleru, A.P, India, E-mail:
@
Received: 20 November, 2017; Accepted: 29 November, 2017; Published: 12 April, 2018
Citation: Lakshmana Rao A, Prasanthi T, Thunnisa F (2018) Development and Validation for Simultaneous Estimation of Proguanil and Atovaquone by using RP-HPLC. SOJ Chromatograph Sci 4(1):1-10.
http://dx.doi.org/10.15226/2471-3627/4/1/00113
Abstract
A simple, precise and rapid RP-HPLC method has been developed
for the simultaneous determination of Proguanil and Atovaquone
in pharmaceutical dosage form. The method was carried out using
Kromasil C18 column (150 mm x 4.6 mm, 5 μm) and mobile phase
comprised of 0.1% Ortho Phosphoric Acid(OPA):Acetonitrile(ACN)
in the ratio of 50:50 v/v and degassed under ultrasonication. The
flow rate was 1.0 mL/min and the effluent was monitored at 287
nm. The retention times of Proguanil and Atovaquone were 2.15
min and 2.48 min respectively. The method was validated in terms
of linearity, precision, accuracy, and specificity, limit of detection and
limit of Quantitation. Linearity was in the range of 25 to 150 μg/mL
for Proguanil and 62.5 to 375 μg/mL for Atovaquone respectively. The
percentage recoveries of both the drugs were ranging from 98.86 to
99.97% for Proguanil and 99.52 to 99.79% for Atovaquone respectively
from the tablet formulation. The proposed method is suitable for the
routine quality control analysis of simultaneous determination of
Proguanil and Atovaquone in bulk and pharmaceutical dosage form.
Keywords: Proguanil; Atovaquone; RP-HPLC; Validation
Introduction
Proguanil (Figure 1) is a biguanide derivative and exerts its
antimalarial action by inhibiting parasitic dihydrofolate reductase
enzyme. Proguanil is chemically (1E)-1-[amino-(4-chloroanilino)
methylidene]-2-propan-2-yl guanidine. It is converted to an
active metabolite called cycloguanil and it has causal prophylactic
and suppressive activity against P. falciparum and cures the acute
infection. It is also effective in suppressing the clinical attacks
of vivax malaria. Proguanil inhibits the dihydrofolate reductase
of plasmodia and thereby blocks the biosynthesis of purines
and pyrimidines, which are essential for DNA synthesis and cell
multiplication [1]. This leads to failure of nuclear division at the
time of schizont formation in erythrocytes and liver.
Atovaquone (Figure 2) is a highly lipophilic drug that closely
resembles the structure ubiquinone. Atovaquone is chemically
2-(trans-4-(p-chlorophenyl)cyclohexyl)-3-hydroxy-1,4
naphthoquinone. Atovaquone is a hydroxy-1,4-naphthoquinone,
an analog of ubiquinone, with antipneumocystis activity.
Its inhibitory effect being comparable to ubiquinone, in
sensitive parasites Atovaquone can act by selectively affecting
mitochondrial electron transport and parallel processes such
as ATP and pyrimidine biosynthesis in Plasmodia Atovaquone
has the advantage of not causing myelosuppression, which is an
important issue in patients who have undergone bone marrow
transplantation [2].
Figure 1: Structure of Proguanil
Figure 2: Structure of Atovaquone
Literature survey reveals that several analytical methods
have been reported for Proguanil and Atovaquone individually
in biological fluids and in pharmaceutical dosage forms [3-8].
Few analytical methods using Spectrophotometry [9], HPLC [10-12]
and LC-MS [13] have been reported for the simultaneous
determination of Proguanil hydrochloride and Atovaquone in
combined dosage forms. The objective of the present study was to
develop and validate a simple, accurate and precise HPLC method
for simultaneous determination of Proguanil and Atovaquone.
Experimental Instrumentation
HPLC instrument used was of WATERS HPLC 2695 SYSTEM
with Auto Injector and PDA Detector. Software used is Empower
2. UV-VIS spectrophotometer PG Instruments T60 with special
bandwidth of 2 mm and 10 mm and matched quartz was be
used for measuring absorbance for Proguanil and Atovaquone
solutions. Degassing of the mobile phase was done by using
an ultrasonic bath sonicator. A Shimadzu balance was used for
weighing the materials.
Chemicals and Solvents
The reference samples of Proguanil hydrochloride (API) and
Atovaquone (API) were obtained from Spectrum Labs, Hyderabad,
India. The branded formulations (tablets) (MALARONE tablets
containing 10 mg of Proguanil and 25 mg of Atovaquone) were
procured from the local market. HPLC grade acetonitrile and
analytical grade OPA was obtained from Rankem Chemicals Ltd,
Mumbai, India. Hydrochloric acid, sodium hydroxide, hydrogen
peroxide of analytical grade was obtained from Merck Chemicals
Ltd, Mumbai, India. Milli-Q water was used throughout the
experiment.
Diluent: The mixture of water and acetonitrile in the ratio of
50:50 v/v was prepared and used as diluent (blank).
Chromatographic conditions
HPLC was connected with Kromasil C18 column (150 mm x
4.6 mm, 5 μm) as stationery phase. A mixture of 0.1%OPA and
acetonitrile in the ratio of 50:50 v/v was prepared and used as
mobile phase. 0.1%OPA was prepared by transferring 1 mL of
OPA solution in a 1000 mL of volumetric flask adds about 100
mL of milli-Q water and final volume make up to 1000 mL with
milli-Q water. Injection volume was 10 μL and flow rate was 1.0
mL/min and run time was 5.0 min. The column was maintained
at ambient temperature and the eluent was monitored at 287 nm.
Preparation of standard solution
Accurately Weighed and transferred 10 mg of Proguanil and
25 mg of Atovaquone working standards into a 10 mL clean dry
volumetric flask, add 3/4th volume of diluent, sonicated for 5
minutes and make up to the final volume with diluents. 1 mL from
the above two stock solutions was taken into a 10 mL volumetric
flask and made up to 10 mL. Standard stock solution was diluted
to get a concentration of 25-150 μg/mL and 62.5-375 μg/mL for
Proguanil and Atovaquone respectively.
Preparation of sample solution
Twenty tablets were weighed and finely powdered. An
accurately weighed portion of powder sample equivalent to 10
mg of Proguanil and 25 mg of Atovaquone was transferred to a 10
mL volumetric flask containing diluent. The contents of the flask
were sonicated for about 30 min for complete solubility of the
drug and volume made up with further quantity of diluent. Then
this mixture was filtered through 0.45 μ membrane filter. 1 mL of
this filtrate was further diluted to 10 mL with diluent.
Method development
Preliminary development trials have performed with octyl
and octadecyl columns with different types, configurations and
from different manufacturers. Finally the expected separation
and shapes of peak was succeeded in Kromasil C18 column. To
effect ideal separation of the drug under isocratic conditions,
mixtures of solvents like water, methanol and acetonitrile with
or without different buffers in different combinations were
tested as mobile phases on a C18 stationary phase. A mixture
of 0.1%OPA and acetonitrile in proportion of ratio 50:50%
v/v was proved to be the most suitable of all the combinations
since the chromatographic peaks obtained were better defined
and resolved and almost free from tailing. The spectra of the
both Proguanil and Atovaquone were showed that a balanced
wavelength was found to be 287 nm. Flow rates of the mobile
phase were changed from 0.5-1.0 mL/min for optimum
separation. It was found from the experiments that 1.0 mL/min
flow rate was ideal for the successful elution of the analyte. The
above optimized chromatographic conditions were followed for
the simultaneous determination of Proguanil and Atovaquone in
bulk samples and its combined tablet formulations.
Validation of the proposed method
The proposed method was validated as per ICH [14,15]
guidelines. The parameters studied for validation were specificity,
linearity, system suitability, precision, accuracy, robustness, limit
of detection, limit of quantification, and solution stability.
Specificity
A study conducted to establish specificity of the proposed
method involved injecting standard, sample, blank and
placebo using the chromatographic conditions defined for the
proposed method. It was found that there is no interference
due to excipients in the tablet formulation and also found good
correlation between the retention times of standard and sample.
The chromatograms of standar, sample, blank and placebo for
Proguanil and Atovaquone were shown in figure 3, 4, 5 & 6.
Linearity
A Linearity was performed by preparing mixed standard
solutions of Proguanil and Atovaquone at different concentration
levels including working concentration mentioned in
experimental condition i.e., 25-150 μg/mL for Proguanil and
62.5-375 μg/mL for Atovaquone respectively. Ten microlitres
of each concentration was injected in duplicate into the HPLC
system. The response was read at 287 nm and the corresponding
chromatograms were recorded. From these chromatograms,
the mean peak areas were calculated and linearity plots of
concentration over the mean peak areas were constructed
individually. The regressions of the plots were computed by least
square regression method. Linearity results were presented in
Table 1 and linearity plots are shown in figure 7 & 8.
Figure 3: Chromatogram of standard solution of Proguanil and Atovaquone
Figure 4: Chromatogram of sample solution of Proguanil and Atovaquone
Figure 5: Chromatogram of blank for Proguanil and Atovaquone
Figure 6: Chromatogram of placebo for Proguanil and Atovaquone
Figure 7: Linearity plot of Proguanil
Figure 8: Linearity plot of Atovaquone
Table 1: Linearity results
S. No. |
Proguanil |
|
Atovaquone |
Conc. (µg/mL) |
Peak area |
Conc. (µg/mL) |
Peak area |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
25 |
57502 |
62.5 |
204362 |
3 |
50 |
106532 |
125 |
366432 |
4 |
75 |
158571 |
187.5 |
553837 |
5 |
100 |
204908 |
250 |
724409 |
6 |
125 |
257251 |
312.5 |
906276 |
7 |
150 |
302396 |
375 |
1069232 |
Slope |
2007 |
2839 |
Intercept |
4766 |
13918 |
Regression Equation(y) |
y = 2007x + 4766 |
y = 2839x + 13918 |
Correlation Coefficient |
0.999 |
0.999 |
System suitability
To study the system suitability, six replicate mixed standard
solutions of Proguanil and Atovaquone were injected. The
percent relative standard deviation (% RSD) was calculated and
it was found to be 0.9 and 0.2 for Proguanil and Atovaquone
respectively, which are well within the acceptable criteria of not
more than 2.0. Results of system suitability studies are shown in
Table 2 & 3.
Table 2: System suitability results for Proguanil
Injection |
Retention time (min) |
Peak area |
Theoretical plates |
Tailing factor |
1 |
2.154 |
175248 |
7534 |
1.11 |
2 |
2.155 |
174752 |
7306 |
1.12 |
3 |
2.162 |
175329 |
7231 |
1.06 |
4 |
2.162 |
172151 |
7297 |
1.05 |
5 |
2.163 |
176254 |
7359 |
1.06 |
6 |
2.164 |
176312 |
7407 |
1.06 |
Mean |
- |
175008 |
- |
- |
SD |
- |
1526.0 |
- |
- |
%RSD |
- |
0.9 |
- |
- |
Precision
Intra-day precision
The Intra-day precision study was carried out on six
preparations from the same tablet samples of Proguanil and
Atovaquone and percent amount of both were calculated. The
%RSD of the assay result of six preparations in method precision
study was found to be 0.8 and 0.2 for Proguanil and Atovaquone
respectively, which are well within the acceptance criteria of not
more than 2.0. The results obtained for assay of Proguanil and
Atovaquone are presented in Table 4.
Table 3: System suitability results for Atovaquone
Injection |
Retention time (min) |
Peak area |
Theoretical plates |
Tailing factor |
1 |
2.48 |
692222 |
6904 |
1.04 |
2 |
2.482 |
694317 |
7132 |
1.05 |
3 |
2.485 |
692948 |
6964 |
1.06 |
4 |
2.485 |
692469 |
7122 |
1.07 |
5 |
2.485 |
691389 |
7129 |
1.07 |
6 |
2.486 |
694015 |
7033 |
1.07 |
Mean |
- |
692893 |
- |
- |
SD |
- |
1112.0 |
- |
- |
%RSD |
- |
0.2 |
- |
- |
Table 4: Intra-day precision results
S. No. |
Proguanil |
Atovaquone |
1 |
173280 |
691365 |
2 |
172224 |
693400 |
3 |
171965 |
693006 |
4 |
174501 |
694414 |
5 |
175218 |
691224 |
6 |
172484 |
690675 |
Mean |
173279 |
692347 |
Std. Dev. |
1321 |
1472.2 |
%RSD |
0.8 |
0.2 |
Inter-day precision
The inter-day precision study was carried out by different
analysts, different columns, different reagents using different
HPLC systems from the same tablet of Proguanil and Atovaquone
and the percent amount for Proguanil and Atovaquone was
calculated. The %RSD of the assay result of six preparations in
intermediate precision study was 0.7% for both Proguanil and
Atovaquone respectively, which are well within the acceptance
criteria of not more than 2.0. The results of intermediate precision
study are reported in Table 5.
Table 5: Inter-day precision results
S. No. |
Proguanil |
Atovaquone |
1 |
190935 |
752329 |
2 |
192023 |
747166 |
3 |
192853 |
742244 |
4 |
189062 |
753322 |
5 |
192173 |
756517 |
6 |
190906 |
747570 |
Mean |
191325 |
749858 |
Std. Dev. |
1340.9 |
5155.6 |
%RSD |
0.7 |
0.7 |
Accuracy
The accuracy of the method was determined by standard
addition method. A known amount of standard drug was added
to the fixed amount of pre-analyzed tablet solution. Percent
recovery was calculated by comparing the area before and after
the addition of the standard drug. The standard addition method
was performed at three concentration levels of 50%, 100% and
150%. The solutions were analyzed in triplicate at each level as
per the proposed method. The percent recovery and %RSD at
each level was calculated and results are presented in Table 6.
Satisfactory recoveries ranging from 98.86 to 99.77 for Proguanil
hydrochloride and 99.52 to 99.71 for Atovaquone respectively
were obtained by the proposed method. This indicates that the
proposed method was accurate.
Robustness
The robustness study was performed by slight modification
in flow rate of the mobile phase, pH of the buffer and composition
of the mobile phase. It was observed that there were no
marked changes in chromatograms, which demonstrated that
the developed method was robust in nature. The results are
presented in Table 7.
Table 6: Results for Accuracy
Sample |
Recovery Level |
Peak area |
Standard Amount added (µg/mL) |
Amount added (µg/mL) |
Amount Recovered (µg/mL) |
Recovery (%) |
Average |
Proguanil |
50% |
305664 |
100 |
50 |
49.92 |
99.85 |
99.77 |
304589 |
100 |
50 |
49.39 |
98.78 |
306495 |
100 |
50 |
50.34 |
100.68 |
100% |
404528 |
100 |
100 |
99.18 |
99.18 |
98.56 |
404129 |
100 |
100 |
98.985 |
98.99 |
402958 |
100 |
100 |
98.4 |
98.4 |
150% |
502926 |
100 |
150 |
148.21 |
98.81 |
99.06 |
503847 |
100 |
150 |
148.67 |
99.11 |
504308 |
100 |
150 |
148.9 |
99.27 |
Atovaquone |
50% |
1075503 |
250 |
125 |
123.93 |
99.14 |
99.79 |
1076502 |
250 |
125 |
124.3 |
99.42 |
1081360 |
250 |
125 |
125.992 |
100.79 |
100% |
1438311 |
250 |
250 |
251.72 |
100.69 |
99.52 |
1421537 |
250 |
250 |
245.82 |
98.33 |
1430215 |
250 |
250 |
248.87 |
99.55 |
150% |
1783229 |
250 |
375 |
373.22 |
99.52 |
99.71 |
1778040 |
250 |
375 |
371.39 |
99.04 |
1794479 |
250 |
375 |
377.18 |
100.58 |
Table 7: Results for Robustness
S. No. |
Robustness condition |
Proguanil
%RSD |
Atovaquone
%RSD |
1 |
Flow minus |
0.5 |
0.3 |
2 |
Flow plus |
0.8 |
0.5 |
3 |
Mobile phase minus |
0.9 |
0.8 |
4 |
Mobile phase plus |
0.5 |
0.3 |
5 |
Temperature minus |
0.7 |
0.6 |
6 |
Temperature plus |
1.1 |
0.8 |
Limit of detection and Limit of quantification
For this study six replicates of the analyte at lowest
concentration were measured and quantified. Limit of detection
was calculated by intercept method and LOD for Proguanil was
found to be 0.88 and Atovaquone was 1.10 μg/mL respectively.
Limit of Quantification was calculated by intercept method and
LOQ for Proguanil and Atovaquone were found to be 2.65 and
3.33 μg/mL respectively.
Assay
Standard preparations are made from the API and sample
preparations are from formulation. Both sample and standards
are injected six homogeneous samples. The average % assay was
calculated and found to be 98.91% and 99.82% for Proguanil and
Atovaquone respectively. The results were represented in Table 8.
Table 8: Assay data of Proguanil and Atovaquone
S. No. |
Proguanil |
Atovaquone |
|
%Assay |
%Assay |
1 |
98.91 |
99.68 |
2 |
98.31 |
99.97 |
3 |
98.16 |
99.92 |
4 |
99.61 |
100.12 |
5 |
100.02 |
99.66 |
6 |
98.46 |
99.58 |
Avg |
98.91 |
99.82 |
Std.Dev. |
0.75 |
0.21 |
%RSD |
0.76 |
0.21 |
Stability studies
In order to demonstrate the stability of both standard and
sample solutions during analysis, both solutions were analyzed
over a period of 24 hours at room temperature. The results
shown that for both solutions, the retention time and peak area
of Proguanil and Atovaquone remained almost similar (%RSD
less than 2.0) and no significant degradation within the indicated
period, thus indicated that both solutions were stable for at least
24 hours, which was sufficient to complete the whole analytical
process. Further forced degradation studies were conducted
indicating the stability of proposed method. The results of the
degradation studies are shown in the Table 9.
Table 9: Degradation Studies
Type of degradation |
Proguanil |
Atovaquone |
Area % |
Recovered % |
Degraded % |
Area % |
Recovered % |
Degraded % |
Acid |
166958 |
95.3 |
4.7 |
660534 |
95.23 |
4.77 |
Base |
169958 |
97.02 |
2.98 |
673534 |
97.11 |
2.89 |
Peroxide |
171993 |
98.18 |
1.82 |
679716 |
98.00 |
2.00 |
Thermal |
173446 |
99.01 |
0.99 |
688538 |
99.27 |
0.73 |
UV |
174006 |
99.33 |
0.67 |
689734 |
99.44 |
0.56 |
Neutral |
174142 |
99.31 |
0.69 |
689227 |
99.37 |
0.63 |
Control sample
Twenty tablets were weighed and finely powdered. An
accurately weighed portion of powder sample equivalent to 10
mg of Proguanil and 25 mg of Atovaquone was transferred to a
10 mL volumetric flask containing diluent. The contents of the
flask were sonicated for about 30 min for complete solubility of
the drug with intermittent shaking at controlled temperature
and then cooled the solution to room temperature and volume
made up with further quantity of diluent. Then this mixture was
filtered through 0.45 μ membrane filter. Pipetted 1 mL of the
above filtered sample solution into a 10 mL volumetric flask and
diluted to volume with diluent.
Acid degradation sample
Twenty tablets were weighed and finely powdered. An
accurately weighed portion of powder sample equivalent to
10 mg of Proguanil hydrochloride and 25 mg of Atovaquone
was transferred to a 10 mL volumetric flask containing diluent.
The contents of the flask were sonicated for about 30 min for
complete solubility of the drug with intermittent shaking at
controlled temperature. Then 2 mL of 5N acid (Hydrochloric
acid) was added, refluxed for 60 minutes at 60°C, then cooled to
room temperature, neutralized with 5N base (Sodium hydroxide)
and diluted to volume with diluent. Then this mixture was
filtered through 0.45 μ membrane filter. Pipetted 1 mL of the
above filtered sample solution into a 10 mL volumetric flask and
diluted to volume with diluent. Typical chromatogram of acid
degradation for Proguanil and Atovaquone is shown in figure 9.
Base degradation sample
Twenty tablets were weighed and finely powdered. An
accurately weighed portion of powder sample equivalent to 10
mg of Proguanil hydrochloride and 25 mg of Atovaquone was
transferred to a 10 mL volumetric flask containing diluent. The
contents of the flask were sonicated for about 30 min for complete
solubility of the drug with intermittent shaking at controlled
temperature. Then 2 mL of 5N base (Sodium hydroxide) was
added, refluxed for 60 minutes at 60°C, then cooled to room
temperature, neutralized with 5N acid (Hydrochloric acid) and
diluted to volume with diluent. Then this mixture was filtered
through 0.45 μ membrane filter. Pipetted 1 mL of the above
filtered sample solution into a 10 mL volumetric flask and
diluted to volume with diluent. Typical chromatogram of base
degradation for Proguanil and Atovaquone is shown in figure 10.
Peroxide degradation sample
Twenty tablets were weighed and finely powdered. An
accurately weighed portion of powder sample equivalent to 10
mg of Proguanil and 25 mg of Atovaquone was transferred to a
10 mL volumetric flask containing diluent. The contents of the
flask were sonicated for about 30 min for complete solubility of
the drug with intermittent shaking at controlled temperature.
Then 0.5 mL of 30% peroxide was added, refluxed for 60 minutes
at 60°C, then cooled to room temperature and diluted to volume
with diluent. Then this mixture was filtered through 0.45 μ
membrane filter. Pipetted 1 mL of the above filtered sample
solution into a 10 mL volumetric flask and diluted to volume
with diluent. Typical chromatogram of peroxide degradation for
Proguanil and Atovaquone is shown in figure 11.
Figure 9: Chromatogram of acid degradation showing Proguanil and Atovaquone
Figure 10: Chromatogram of base degradation showing Proguanil and Atovaquone
Figure 11: Chromatogram of oxidative degradation showing Proguanil and Atovaquone
Thermal degradation sample
Twenty tablets were weighed and finely powdered. The
powder is exposed to heat at 105°C for about 2 days. An
accurately weighed portion of powder sample equivalent to 10
mg of Proguanil hydrochloride and 25 mg of Atovaquone was
transferred to a 10 mL volumetric flask containing diluent. The
contents of the flask were sonicated for about 30 min for complete
solubility of the drug with intermittent shaking at controlled
temperature and then cooled the solution to room temperature
and volume made up with further quantity of diluent. Then this
mixture was filtered through 0.45 μ membrane filter. Pipetted 1
mL of the above filtered sample solution into a 10 mL volumetric
flask and diluted to volume with diluent. Typical chromatogram
of thermal degradation for Proguanil hydrochloride and
Atovaquone is shown in figure 12.
Figure 12: Chromatogram of thermal degradation showing Proguanil and Atovaquone
Photo stability studies
Twenty tablets were weighed and finely powdered. An
accurately weighed portion of powder sample equivalent to 10
mg of Proguanil hydrochloride and 25 mg of Atovaquone was
transferred to a 10 mL volumetric flask containing diluent. The
contents of the flask were sonicated for about 30 min for complete
solubility of the drug with intermittent shaking at controlled
temperature and then cooled the solution to room temperature
and volume made up with further quantity of diluent. Then this
mixture was filtered through 0.45 μ membrane filter. Pipetted 1
mL of the above filtered sample solution into a 10 mL volumetric
flask and diluted to volume with diluent. The photochemical
stability of the drug was also studied by exposing the above
solution to UV light by keeping the beaker in UV Chamber for 7
days or 200 Watt hours/m2 in photo stability chamber. Typical
chromatogram of photo stability for Proguanil hydrochloride and
Atovaquone is shown in figure 13.
Neutral degradation studies
Stress testing under neutral conditions was studied by
refluxing the drug in water for 6hrs at a temperature of 60ºC.
Typical chromatogram of neutral degradation for Proguanil
hydrochloride and Atovaquone is shown in figure 14.
Figure 13: Chromatogram of Photo stability showing Proguanil and Atovaquone
Figure 14: Chromatogram of Neutral degradation showing Proguanil and Atovaquone
Results and Discussion
The present study was aimed at developing a simple, sensitive,
precise and accurate RP-HPLC method for the simultaneous
estimation of Proguanil and Atovaquone from bulk samples and
their tablet dosage forms. Kromasil C18(150 mm X 4.6 mm, 5μ)
analytical chromatographic column was chosen as the stationary
phase for the separation and simultaneous determination of
Proguanil and Atovaquone. Mixtures of commonly used solvents
like water, methanol and acetonitrile with or without buffers in
different combinations were tested as mobile phases. The choice
of the optimum composition is based on the chromatographic
response factor, a good peak shape with minimum tailing. A
mixture of 0.1%OPA and acetonitrile in the ratio of 50:50 v/v
was proved to be the most suitable of all the combinations since
the chromatographic peak obtained was well defined, better
resolved and almost free from tailing. The retention times of the
Proguanil and Atovaquone were found to be 2.155 and 2.482 min
respectively. The linearity was found satisfactory for both the
drugs in the range of 62.5 to 375 μg/mL for Proguanil and 25 to
150 μg/mL for Atovaquone respectively. The regression equation
of the linearity curve between concentrations of Proguanil and
Atovaquone over its peak areas were found to be y = 2007x +
4766 and y = 2839x+13918 respectively. Precision of the method
was studied by repeated injection of tablet solution and results
showed lower %RSD values. This reveals that the method is
quite precise. The percent recoveries of the drug solutions were
studied at three different concentration levels. The percent
individual recovery and the %RSD at each level were within the
acceptable limits. This indicates that the method is accurate.
The absence of additional peaks in the chromatogram indicates
non-interference of the commonly used excipients in the tablets
and hence the method is specific. The deliberate changes in the
method have not much affected the peak tailing, theoretical plates
and the percent assay. This indicates that the present method is
robust. The system suitability studies were carried out to check
various parameters such as theoretical plates and tailing factor.
The lowest values of LOD and LOQ as obtained by the proposed
method indicate that the method is sensitive. The solution
stability studies indicate that both the drugs were stable up to
24 hours. The forced degradation studies indicate that both the
drugs Proguanil and Atovaquone were stable in stability studies.
Conclusion
The present study demonstrated a validated Reverse Phase
High Performance Liquid Chromatography method for the
estimation of Proguanil and Atovaquone available as tablet dosage
form. Literature review revealed that only few instrumental
methods have been reported to determine Proguanil and
Atovaquone individually in formulation. The scope of the present
work is to build up the linear and optimized of the chromatographic
conditions and RP-HPLC method for the estimation of drug
in tablet dosage form. The method was completely validated
and showed satisfactory results. The method was free from
interference of the other active ingredients and additives used in
the formulation. Retention time and runtime was decreased, So
the developed method can be used for simultaneous analysis of
Proguanil and Atovaquone in pharmaceutical dosage forms.
- Nixon GL, Moss DM, Shone AE, Ward SA, Biagini GA, Lalloo DG, et al. Antimalarial pharmacology and therapeutics of Atovaquone. J of Antimicrob Chemother. 2013;68(5):977-985. DOI: 10.1093/jac/dks504
- Ryley JF. The mode of action of Proguanil and related antimalarial drugs. Br J Pharmacol. 1953;8(4):424-430.
- Patel RKN, Patel JK, Patel MP, Rajput GC. A validated method for development of Proguanil as API and tablet dosage forms by UV spectroscopy. Pharm Methods. 2010;1(1):61-64. DOI:10.4103/2229-4708.72234
- Nandini RP, Seema SS. Development and validation of stability indicating RP-HPLC method for estimation of Proguanil Hydrochloride in tablet dosage form. J Chem Pharma Sci. 2013;3(4);206-217.
- Viplava K, Pavani HV. Development and validation of stability-indicating RP-HPLC method for estimation of Atovaquone hydrochloride in tablet dosage form. Int J Pharma Cli Res. 2012;4(4):68-72.
- Gurule S, Goswami D, Khuroo AH, Monif T. LC-APCI mass spectrometric method development and validation for the determination of Atovaquone in human plasma. Biomed Chromat. 2010;24(5):497-505. DOI:10.1002/bmc.1317
- Patil SD, Kokatea SD, Mohitea SK, Magduma CS. Development and validation of RP-HPLC method on Atovaquone in bulk and tablet dosage form. Cur Pharma Res. 2013;4(1):1093-1096.
- Pingale SG, Nerurkar KK, Padgaonkar AM, Pawar UD, Mangaonkar KV. Alternative LC–MS–MS method for simultaneous determination of Atovaquone, its active metabolite in human plasma and application to a bioequivalence study. Chromatographia. 2009;70(7-8):1095-1102. DOI:10.1365/s10337-009-1259-9
- Sumanth K, Kumari KJL, Sreelekha P, Chandana A, Suresh ChV. Development and validation of simple spectrophotometric, first and second derivative spectroscopy for estimation of Atovaquone in bulk and pharmaceutical formulations. J Res Pharma Prac. 2011;2(2):261-265.
- Jadhav NS, Lalitha J. Spectroscopic method development and validation for simultaneous estimation of Atovaquone and Proguanil in tablet dosage form. W J Pharm Pharma Sci. 2014;3(6):1986-1994.
- Veer VS, Badgujar MA, Kiran VM. Simultaneous determination of Proguanil and Atovaquone hydrochloride in tablet dosage form by high performance liquid chromatography. Res J Pharma. Biol Chem Sci. 2012;3(4):377.
- Sahoo S, Panda PK, Mishra SK. HPLC method development for simultaneous estimation of Proguanil and Atovaquone in tablet dosage form. Int J Pharm Pharma Sci. 2012;4(3):212.
- Veer VS, Pingale SG, Manfaonkar KV. Ultra Performance Liquid Chromatography method for simultaneous determination of Atovaquone and Proguanil in rabbit plasma and its application to a pharmacokinetic study. J Liq Chroma Tech. 2013;37(14):1953-1967. DOI: org/10.1080/10826076.2013.825854
- ICH Harmonised Tripartite Guideline. Validation of Analytical Procedures: Text and Methodology, Q2(R1), USA, 2005; 1-13.
- ICH Harmonised Tripartite Guideline. Stability Testing of New Drug Substances and Products, Q1A(R2), USA, 2003; 1-18.