2Lecturer, BGMEA University of Fashion & Technology (BUFT), Uttara-1230, Dhaka, Bangladesh
Keywords: 3d Body scanning; Pattern Block; Bangladeshi Body Morphology;
1. Creating more closely fitted garment than traditional way ensuring fit and balance
2. To create a data after analyzing human body morphology
3. To correct traditional pattern block by using 3D measurement
4. To propose a pattern block for commercial purpose
This research contains all the answer from those objectives. The author tries to ensure the demand of customer in make to order garments label.
Device |
Software |
3D body Scanning Machine ( Human Solution 1.0) |
Anthroscan for collecting and converting 3D scanning data from 3D body scanner. |
Digital Camera for taking picture |
Adobe Illustrator cc |
SL |
Chest: Waist |
Hip: Waist |
Waist to Knee |
Waist to Chest |
Waist to Hip |
1 |
1:1.23 |
1:1.4 |
60.3 |
20.1 |
20.1 |
2 |
1:1.3 |
1:1.1 |
59.5 |
15.5 |
18.6 |
3 |
1:1.6 |
1:1.07 |
61.4 |
18.8 |
22.1 |
4 |
1:1.08 |
1:1.06 |
67.3 |
17.5 |
20.9 |
5 |
1:1.2 |
1:1.2 |
63.4 |
19.3 |
22.2 |
6 |
1:1.23 |
1:1.18 |
63 |
20.7 |
23.1 |
7 |
1:1.11 |
1:1 |
56.4 |
17.2 |
19.1 |
8 |
1:1.14 |
1:1.12 |
60.2 |
19.2 |
17.3 |
9 |
1:1.11 |
1:1.07 |
58.7 |
20.1 |
17.8 |
10 |
1:1.22 |
1:1.15 |
59.2 |
19.8 |
18.1 |
11 |
1:1.12 |
1:1.06 |
61 |
19.3 |
16.5 |
12 |
1:1.16 |
1:1.23 |
57.9 |
20.1 |
16.3 |
13 |
1:1.24 |
1:1.21 |
65.1 |
22.8 |
19.8 |
14 |
1:1.24 |
1:1.19 |
63.6 |
22.3 |
18.8 |
15 |
1:1.7 |
1:1.19 |
61.8 |
20.3 |
23.1 |
16 |
1:1.35 |
1:1.18 |
58.3 |
16.7 |
23.2 |
17 |
1:1.13 |
1:1.10 |
56 |
18 |
18.5 |
18 |
1:1.17 |
1:1.85 |
57.1 |
19.8 |
16.1 |
19 |
1:1.25 |
1:1.22 |
64 |
23 |
20 |
20 |
1:1.207 |
1:1.19 |
63.4 |
19 |
22.3 |
• Inverted triangle body: Athletic body with strong muscle, wide shoulder, thin waist. Waist-bust/chest<< 0
• Triangular body: Overweight and unhealthy body, waist is bigger than the chest. Waist-bust>0
• Rectangular body shape: Very lean body, where waist is equal to the chest, body side line is straight. Waist-chest=0.
After analyzing different types of body we find the following types of body percentage among of 25 bodies. In table 2 we Can find the percentage of body shape: (Table 2)
Body Selection: A body from inverted triangle group (Waist 83.2; Chest 102; Hip 96.3) is selected for further study.
Name |
||||||||
Brand 1 |
Brand 2 |
Brand 3 |
Brand 4 |
|||||
CLOSE FITTING |
LOOSE FITTING |
CLOSE FITTING |
LOOSE FITTING |
CLOSE FITTING |
LOOSE FITTING |
CLOSE FITTING |
LOOSE FITTING |
|
Waist |
0 |
As customer |
+2.8 |
4 |
+2 |
+2.5 |
+1 |
+2 |
Hip |
0 |
+2 |
+2 |
+2.8 |
Same |
+2.5 |
As customer |
As customer |
Thigh |
+1.5 |
3 |
+2 |
+2.8 |
+1 |
+2.5 |
+1 |
As customer |
Full length |
As customer |
As |
As customer |
As customer |
+1.5 |
+2 |
+2 |
+4 |
High |
-2 |
+3 |
As customer |
As customer |
+2 |
+2.5 |
|
|
Bottom |
+3 |
+6 |
As customer |
As customer |
+1.5 |
+3 |
As customer |
As customer |
NAME |
Metric Pattern Cutting for Men’s wear |
Helen Joseph- Armstrong |
Ease used for Proposed pattern. |
Waist |
8 |
6.7 |
8 |
Hip |
9 |
2 |
9 |
Thigh |
- |
- |
- |
Waist to knee |
½ of waist to ankle – 5 |
- |
½ of waist to ankle - 3 |
Body rise |
4 |
3.6 |
4 |
Bottom (f) |
-2 |
-1 |
-1 |
Bottom (b) |
+2 |
+1 |
+1 |
Measurement |
Body scanning serial no. |
Effectiveness |
Front waist |
6520 |
We will get actual sideline and it will match with the body sideline |
Front hip arc |
7525 |
For close fitted and it will both fit in front and back side |
Front body rise |
6011 |
We will get better fitting in crotch area |
Back body rise |
6012 |
We will get better fitting in crotch area |
Knee circumference |
9521;9521 |
For better fitting in knee area |
Dart |
|
Longer dart and it will be curved dart will help for better fitting in back |
Calf girth |
9540;9541 |
Better fitting in leg area |
Verification : |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Sl |
Measurement Name |
Metric pattern cutting |
Helen Joseph Armstrong |
Metric pattern |
Helen |
Traditional(Ease) |
|||
Brand 1 |
Brand 2 |
Brand 3 |
Brand 4 |
||||||
1. |
Full Length |
√ |
√ |
4 |
x |
1.27 |
x |
2.54 |
2.54 |
2. |
Across Shoulder |
x |
√ |
x |
x |
1.27 |
x |
2.54 |
2.54 |
3. |
Chest |
√ |
√ |
20 |
15.3 |
10.16 |
10.16 |
6.25 |
10.16 |
4. |
A. Back/ Half Back |
√ |
√ |
√ |
.64 |
x |
x |
x |
x |
5. |
Shoulder Length |
x |
√ |
x |
.64 |
x |
x |
x |
x |
6. |
Shoulder Slope |
x |
√ |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
7. |
Neck Circumference |
√ |
√ |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
8. |
Scye depth |
√ |
X |
6 |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
9. |
Hip |
x |
X |
x |
x |
2.54 |
x |
x |
x |
10. |
Belly |
x |
X |
x |
x |
2.54 |
x |
x |
x |
Back
|
Front |
Name |
Body Measurement |
Traditional Pattern |
Proposed Pattern Block with additional Measurements |
|||
F |
B |
F |
B |
F |
B |
|
Chest |
21cm |
19.9cm |
29.4cm |
25.9cm |
29cm |
26.5cm |
Across Front width |
19.7cm |
19.7cm |
23.7cm |
23.7cm |
23.7cm |
23.7cm |
Shoulder Length |
15.51cm |
15.51cm |
17.1cm |
17.1cm |
17.9cm |
17.9cm |
Hip |
25.3cm |
25.3cm |
26.5cm |
26.5cm |
26.8cm |
26.8cm |
Waist |
23.7cm |
23.7cm |
24.2cm |
24.2cm |
24cm |
24cm |
- Apeagyei PR. Significance of Body Image among Female UK Fashion Consumers: the cult of Size Zero, the Skinny Trend. Journal of Fashion Design, Technology and Education. 2008;1(1):3- 11.
- Ashdown SP, Loker S, Schoenfelder K, Lyman Clarke L. Using 3D Scans for Fit Analysis. Journal of Textile and Apparel, Technology and Management. 2004;4(1):12.
- Beazley A. Size and Fit: The Development of Size Charts for Clothing. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management. 1999;3(1):66-84.
- J Fan, W Yu, L Hunter. Clothing Appearance and Fit: Science and Technology. Woodland Publishing Ltd, Cambridge. 2004.
- Istook CL, Hwang S. 3D Body Scanning Systems with Application to the Apparel Industry. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management. 2001;5(2):120-132.
- Simmons KP, Istook CL. Body Measurement Techniques: Comparing 3D Body-Scanning and Anthropometric Methods for Apparel Applications. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 2003;7(3):306-332.
- Simmons KP, Istook CL. Body Measurement Techniques: a Comparison of 3D Body Scanning and Physical Anthropometric Methods. In Proceddings of the KSCT/ITAA Joint World Conference, Seoul, South Korea, ITAA Publications. 2001.
- Workman JE, Lentz ES. Measurement Specification for Manufacturers for Prototype Bodices. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal. 2000;18(4):251-256.









