Research Article Open Access
Medical Student Melanoma Detection Rates in White and African American Skin using Moulage and Standardized Patients
Stephanie Wang1*, Lynda Shadrake2, Pauline Scott1, Hajwa Kim3, Claudia Hernandez1
1Department of Dermatology, University of Illinois, Chicago
2Department of Medical Education, University of Illinois, Chicago
3Center for Clinical and Translational Science ,University of Illinois, Chicago
*Corresponding authors address: Wang Stephanie, Department of Dermatology, University of Illinois at Chicago, (MC 624), 808 South Wood Street, Room 376 CME, Chicago, Illinois, 60612, Tel: (847) 494-6657; Fax:312-869-8220 ; E-mail: @
Received: May 18, 2015; Accepted: November 23, 2015; Published: December 19, 2015
Citation: Wang S, Shadrake L, Scott P, Kim H, Hernandez C (2015) Medical Student Melanoma Detection Rates in White and African American Skin using Moulage and Standardized Patients. Clin Res Dermatol Open Access 2(1): 1-4.
Keywords: Melanoma detection; Skin cancer screening; Ethnic disparities; African American; Simulation; Moulage; Standardized patients; Education
Introduction
Published medical literature has established an ethnic disparity in melanoma stage at time of diagnosis, which has been attributed in part to earlier detection in whites as compared to African Americans[1-6]. Lack of physician knowledge about the clinical presentations of melanoma in African Americans, particularly acral lentiginous melanoma (ALM), in addition to misperceptions that melanomas only occur in sun-exposed areas and that dark-skinned individuals are not at risk may contribute to the reported diagnostic delay[3,6]. A consequence of the rarity of melanomas in African Americans (1 per 100,000 as compared to 21.6 per 100,000 in whites) is that medical students have few opportunities to see melanomas in African Americans during short dermatology clerkships, and medical educators have limited opportunities to train and assess medical student melanoma diagnostic skills in this population. Our group has previously used standardized patients (SPs) and moulage to evaluate medical student melanoma detection skills[7]. In this study, we build upon our prior work and use SPs and moulage to assess fourth-year medical student melanoma detection rates in different skin types among physicians early in their training.
Material and Methods
This study was approved by the University of Illinois at Chicago (UIC) Institutional Review Board. All fourth-year UIC medical students undergo a competency in clinical skills assessment as part of the curriculum using SPs. Only professional actors are used as SPs by the UIC Graham Clinical Performance Center and they are trained to portray a scripted patient presentation reliably and accurately during multiple encounters. The method of using SPs and moulages in simulated scenarios to assess melanoma detection rates in the current study has been previously published by our group[7]. As before, we utilized a wrist pain case with a melanoma moulage painted on the second digit of the SP's hand where it would be easily visible during an examination of the hands (Fig.1). Four non-Hispanic white (referred to as white) actors and 4 African American actors presented our case after a board-certified dermatologist (CH) reviewed the moulage for realism.

During the SP training sessions, a dermatologist (CH) helped coach the SPs on how to answer questions about the clinical history and symptoms of the simulated melanoma. The SP was instructed not to mention the lesion unless the student noticed the moulage. It is only if the student mentions the simulated lesion that the SP would answer specific questions posed by the student. The SPs were to provide the following information if asked by the student: the lesion was noticed approximately 6-8 months prior, the lesion has been growing in size; the patient grew up in Florida with heavy sun exposure, had no prior history of skin cancer, experienced no symptoms of pain or bleeding, and noticed no other changes in any other nevi.

The melanoma moulage case was featured as part of the 12-station Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) that fourth-year students are required to take. We assessed a total of 357 fourth-year medical students. Students were instructed that everything they observed during the encounter should be considered as part of the patient's presenting clinical findings. Each student had 15 minutes to conduct a focused history and physical examination and 10 minutes to document pertinent history, physical examination findings, differential diagnosis, and work-up plans. Student encounters were video-recorded.

Following the encounter, SPs completed a checklist regarding the history, physical examination, and follow-up recommendations (Table 1). Student clinical notes, SP checklists, and video recordings were all reviewed by two authors (CH and PS) to determine whether the student noticed the melanoma moulage, obtained relevant history, performed a screening physical examination, and correctly counseled the patient regarding further management.
Results
A total of 357 fourth-year medical students participated in our study. White SPs were assessed by 174 students, while African American SPs were assessed by 183 students. Study results are shown in (Table 2). Of the 174 students assessing white SPs, 47 noticed the moulage, but only 34 correctly counseled the SP that the lesions required a biopsy or a dermatologist assessment. Among the 13 students who did not recommend either biopsy or follow-up, several were observed to tell the SP that the lesion was benign or not to worry about the lesion. The 34 students who correctly counseled the patient were used to calculate the detection rate among white SPs (19.5%). Of the 182 students assessing African American SPs, 41 noticed the moulage, and 29 correctly asked the patient to undergo a biopsy or follow-up with dermatology. The detection rate for African American SPs was 15.9%. The total detection rate for all SPs in this study was 17.6%.
Discussion
We previously reported the utility of using the melanoma moulage/SP simulation technique to evaluate melanoma detection by medical students in non-Hispanic whites[7]. In this study, we wish to prove that this technique can be utilized to assess medical student melanoma detection rates in different skin types including skin of color. Simulated melanomas are an important method to add to our armamentarium to assess physician detection skills in academic centers. Since melanomas are rare among African Americans[4], accruing a sufficient number of African American melanoma patients in a prospective manner can be challenging. We sought to find an alternative method to assess medical student melanoma detection rates in whites and African Americans given the melanoma disparity and lingering question regarding potential physician diagnostic delays contributing to poor outcomes in African Americans.

Four previous studies[7-10] have investigated medical student melanoma detection rates using SPs and moulage (Table 3). One of the studies [9] assessed the performance of opportunistic screening in whites and African Americans. Robinson et al. [9] found that 9 of 58 (16%) medical students noticed moulages placed on SPs who presented with dermatologic complaints, with no significant difference in detection due to patient race. Our study design differed in that students assessed SPs during a oneon- one consultation, and SPs presented with chief complaints unrelated to dermatology in order to remove the cue to perform a visual inspection of the skin.
Figure 1: Melanoma moulage applied to the second digit of a white standardized patient's hand (a) and an African American standardized patient's hand (b).
Table 1: Melanoma SP Checklist. The following components of the melanoma SP checklist were assessed by SPs immediately after the encounter.

Melanoma SP checklist

The examinee noticed the melanoma moulage

History

The examinee asked me if I have noticed any changes in the lesion

The examinee asked me if I have experienced any symptoms related to the lesion

The examinee asked me if I have a family history of skin cancer

The examinee asked me if I ever had a previous diagnosis of skin cancer

The examinee asked me about previous sunburns

The examinee asked me about sunscreen use

The examinee asked if I had noticed changes in any other moles

The examinee asked if I performed regular self skin examinations

Physical Examination

The examinee noticed the moulage on my hand during the physical examination portion of the encounter

The examinee examined my feet

The examinee palpated for axillary lymphadenopathy (must be performed bilaterally)

Assessment/Plan

The examinee recommended further follow-up with a dermatologist and/or biopsy

Surprisingly, our study found that medical student detection rates were low in both groups and did not differ significantly between whites (19.5%) and African Americans (15.9%). Thus this study continues to document low rates of detection for opportunistic detection irrespective of skin color by medical students early in their medical education[7-10]. The issue of the potential cause of melanoma disparity has been the subject of much discussion. Biological, environmental, and even physician factors have all been implicated. This study demonstrates a simulated technique that can be used to study physician skills at detecting a rare but important cancer. Unlike many cancer detection programs that assess student skills using photographs, our simulated scenario more closely approximates an actual physician-patient encounter and draws medical educators closer to assessing physician behavior and skills in a real world clinical encounter. Moreover, this study begins the process of assessing detection rates between two different skin types and found that physician detection rates were low in both groups with no statistically significant difference.

Our study underscores the fact that much work remains to be done in regards to melanoma education in medical school. In addition to continuing to build on visual melanoma recognition, dermatology curricula need to cover the differences in risk factors and clinical presentations of melanoma in different skin types[11]. For instance, the greatest melanoma risk factors in whites include periods of high intermittent sun exposure and/or large cumulative doses of UV radiation from chronic sun exposure, family or personal history of melanoma and/or non-melanoma skin cancers, large number of common benign nevi, atypical nevi, and history of blistering sunburns[11,12]. Risk factors for African Americans, however, include burn scars, radiation therapy, trauma, albinism, and immunosuppression[12]. Even though less of a significant factor in the development of melanoma in African Americans, UV radiation may still play a role in African American skin[12]. In our study, none of the medical students who had noticed the moulage on African American SPs had inquired about prior sunburn history and only 1 student had asked about sunscreen use. Therefore, it is necessary to educate students not to overlook sun exposure history and sun protection practices even when evaluating African Americans. The importance of examining acral and mucosal regions in African Americans should also be taught as our study found that only 1 medical student evaluating an African American SP had inspected the patient's feet after detecting the moulage on the hand[12].

One limitation of our study was that students assessed either a white or African American SP, which did not allow us to directly evaluate a particular student's skill for both skin types. Other limitations include testing only students attending one medical school and time constraints since this occurred in the context of an OSCE, which may affect the number of students who decide to perform skin examinations and focus only on the wrist pain complaint.

Reports have suggested that secondary prevention efforts, such as skin cancer screenings, are suboptimal in patients of color, with African Americans being screened less frequently than whites[13-20]. One cited reason for the disparity in skin cancer screening is low physician confidence levels in surveillance skills in African Americans[21] and lack of physician education in the risk factors and presentations of skin cancer within this population[3]. Our study highlights the need to continue to develop a more comprehensive melanoma education program even at the medical student level. We demonstrate the potential use of SPs and moulage as an educational tool to reduce educators' dependence on the presentation of melanoma in the outpatient setting at a time when students or residents are present in order to teach or assess their skills. Furthermore, this study begins to hint at educational targets for curricular improvement so that properly trained medical students will graduate with the skills and confidence to provide melanoma screenings for patients of any skin color.
Table 2:Results.

Elements of history, physical examination, and management plan

Number of students (Black SPs)

N = 183

Number of students (White SPs)

N = 174

Noticed nevus

41 (22%)

47 (27%)

Asked if there were any changes in nevus

38 (21%)

37 (21%)

Asked if patient had any symptoms

31 (17%)

26 (15%)

Asked if patient had a family history of skin cancer

3 (2%)

7 (4%)

Asked if patient had personal history of skin cancer

1 (0.5%)

2 (1%)

Asked about sunburn history

0 (0%)

7 (4%)

Asked about sunscreen use

1 (0.5%)

2 (1%)

Asked if patient had noticed changes in any other moles

7 (4%)

8 (5%)

Asked if patient regularly performed self skin examinations

1 (0.5%)

0 (0%)

Examined feet

1 (0.5%)

0 (0%)

Palpated for axillary lymphadenopathy

1 (0.5%)

0 (0%)

Recommended further follow-up

29 (16%)

34 (20%)

Included carpal tunnel on the differential diagnosis

181 (99%)

174 (100%)

Included melanoma on the differential diagnosis

26 (14%)

25 (14%)

Noticed nevus while performing the physical examination

31 (17%)

34 (20%)

Table 3: Summary of previous studies utilizing standardized patients (SPs) and moulage to assess medical student melanoma detection rates.

Study

Detection rate (no counseling) provided

Detection rate (with counseling provided)

Ethnic differences in detection rate

Pre-assessment education

Assessment technique

 

SP chief complaint

Robinson et al. (1996) [8]

1/285 (0.35%)

0/285 (0%)

N/A

Skin cancer lecture written exam + photographs

  • SP + moulage
  • M2 clinical skills examination

Non-dermatologic

Robinson et al. (2010) [9]

 9/58 (15.5%)

N/A

No significant difference

Skin cancer lecture

  • SP + moulage
  • M2 voluntary dermatology experience

 

Dermatologic

References
  1. Altekruse SF, Kosary CL, Krapcho M, Neyman N, Aminou R, Waldron W, et al. (eds) SEER cancer statistics review, 1975-2007. 2010. National Cancer Institute. Bethesda, MD. based on November 2009 SEER data submission. Accessed on 4/9/2012.
  2. Jemal A, Clegg LX, Ward E, Ries LA, Wu X, Jamison RM, et al. Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975-2001 with a special feature regarding survival. Cancer. 2004;101(1):3-27.
  3. Kundu RV. Practice gaps. Barriers in melanoma detection in ethnic minorities: comment on anatomic distribution of malignant melanoma on the non-Hispanic black patient, 1998-2007. Arch Dermatol. 2012;148(7):801-802. doi: 10.1001/archdermatol.2012.910.
  4. Cress RD, Holly EA. Incidence of cutaneous melanoma among non-Hispanic Whites, Hispanics, Asians, and Blacks: analysis of California Cancer Registry Data, 1988-93. Cancer Causes Control. 1997;8(2):246-252.
  5. Rouhani P, Hu S, Kirsner RS. Melanoma in Hispanic and black Americans Cancer Control. 2008;15(3):248-253.
  6. Korta DZ, Saggar V, Wu TP, Sanchez M. Racial differences in skin cancer awareness and surveillance practices at a public hospital dermatology clinic. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2014;70(2):312-317.  doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2013.10.030. Epub 2013 Dec 9.
  7. Hernandez C, Mermelstein R, Robinson JK, Yudkowsky R. Assessing students' ability to detect melanomas using standardized patients and moulage. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2013;68(3):e83-88.  doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2011.10.032. Epub 2011 Dec 23.
  8. Robinson JK, McGaghie WC. Skin cancer detection in a clinical practice examination with standardized patients. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1996;34(4):709-711.
  9. Robinson JK, Lio P, Hernandez C, Kim NN, Lee KC, Wickless H, et al. Medical student detection of melanoma: clinical skills. Arch Dermatol. 2010;146(10):1175-1177. doi: 10.1001/archdermatol.2010.255.
  10. Goulart JM, Dusza S, Pillsbury A, Soriano RP, Halpem AC, Marghoob AA. Recognition of melanoma: a dermatologic clinical competency in medical student education. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2012;67(4):606-611. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2011.12.007. Epub 2012 Jan 24.
  11. Agbai ON, Buster K, Sanchez M, Hernandez C, Kundu RV, Chiu M, et al. Skin cancer and photoprotection in people of color: a review and recommendations for physicians and the public. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2014;70(4):748-762. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2013.11.038. Epub 2014 Jan 28.
  12. Gloster HM Jr, Neal K. Skin cancer in skin of color. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2006;55(5):741-760; quiz 761-764.
  13. Koroukian SM, Bakaki PM, Raghavan D. Survival disparities by Medicaid status: An analysis of 8 cancers. Cancer. 2012;118(17):4271-4279. doi:10.1002/cncr.27380. Epub 2011 Dec 27.
  14. Esnaola NF, Ford ME. Racial differences and disparities in cancer care and outcomes. Surg Oncol Clin Am. 2012;21(3):417-437. doi:10.1016/j.soc.2012.03.012.
  15. Zhao BB, Kilbourne B, Stain SC, Van Cain A, Briggs NC, Husaini BA, et al. Racial disparities and trends in use of colorectal procedures among Tennessee elderly (1996-2000). Ethn Dis. 2006;16(2):412-420.
  16. Tannor BB, Ross L. Physician-patient discussions about prostate-specific antigen test among African-American men. J Natl Meed Assoc. 2006;98(4):532-538.
  17. Wee CC, McCarthy EP, Phillips RS. Factors associated with colon cancer screening: the role of patient factors and physician counseling. Prev Med. 2005;41(1):23-29.
  18. Crawley LM, Ahn DK, Winkleby MA. Perceived medical discrimination and cancer screening behaviors of racial and ethnic minority adults. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2008;17(8):1937-1944.  doi:10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-08-0005. Epub 2008 Aug 6.
  19. Vernon SW. Risk perception and risk communication for cancer screening behaviors: a review. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 1999;(25):101-119.
  20. Saraiya M, Hall HI, Thompson T, Hartman A, Glanz K, Rimer B, et al. Skin cancer screening among US adults from 1992, 1998, and 2000 National Health Interview Surveys. Prev Med. 2004;39(2):308-314.
  21. Stephenson A, From L, Cohen A, Tipping J. Family physicians' knowledge of malignant melanomas. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1997;37(6):953-957.
 
Listing : ICMJE   

Creative Commons License Open Access by Symbiosis is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License