2Neurosurgery Department, IbnSina Hospital, Ministry of Health, Kuwait
3Department of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
4Department of Dermatology, Al-Nahdha Hospital, Oman Medical Specialty Board, Muscat, Oman
5Gulf Research Collaboration Group (GRCG), Sultanate of Oman
6Department of Neurology & Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
7Kuwait Medical School, Health Sciences Center, Kuwait University, Jabriya, Kuwait
Tariq Al-Saadi, MD, Department of Neurology & Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, QC, Canada. 3801 Rue University, Montreal, QuebecH3A 2B4, E-mail:
Objectives: The goal of our study is to identify the level of knowledge and the effect of COVID-19 on dermatology residents.
Methods: A cross-sectional analysis in which 77 dermatology residents from three Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries and Canada completed an online questionnaire-based survey. The questionnaire consisted of four sections: one general information about the resident and three on knowledge, safety measures and impact of COVID-19, with a total of 26 questions. The questionnaire was scored out of 10 with those above the mean considered as having satisfactory knowledge.
Results: The mean (SD) knowledge score was 6.25 (1.6). There was a statistically significant difference noted between the GCC countries and Canada in terms of the knowledge score (p-value=0.035). Only 14% of dermatology residents felt competent in managing COVID-19 patients. Seventy percent felt that the pandemic has negatively affected their dermatology training.
Conclusion: Dermatology residents demonstrated a difference in knowledge score in relation to the geographic location of the program. Almost 46% of residents illustrated a satisfactory knowledge score about COVID-19. Only a small percentage of residents are confident in treating COVID-19 patients. Subsequently, the need for improved education of residents regarding COVID-19 before redeployment is warranted.
Keywords: Coronavirus (COVID-19); Knowledge; Dermatology Residents; Impact
GCC: Gulf Cooperation Council
ICU: Intensive care unit
PPE: Personal protective equipment
WHO: World Health Organization
Capsule Summary
• Dermatology Residents are being reassigned to different specialties to care for COVID-19 patients due to the rapid spread of the disease.
• Basic courses on managing COVID-19 patients before allocating dermatology residents to situations where they are required to deal with such cases. Yearly session on the preferred hand hygiene method is encouraged.
The COVID-19 pandemic has affected almost everyone around the world, but especially healthcare workers. Although dermatologists are not frontline physicians, many have been redeployed to COVID-19 wards/ICU or emergency department, necessitating a rapid revision course regarding the management of critical patients [2]. Concerning medical education, the current state poses a challenge to medical residents in all specialties. The replacement of in-person classes, seminars, and bedside teaching with online lectures is undoubtedly essential and has been implemented by many centers. However, it also has the potential to create a loss of hands-on in-hospital training and could impact training. This change can be particularly accurate for residents in surgical specialties [3]. Non-urgent outpatient appointments have shut down due to the need for social distancing, and thus, residents were unable to complete their scheduled clinical rotations. Telemedicine has been applied by several institutes [4]. Moreover, multiple programs have rescheduled certain examinations, and thus programs are unable to assess the level of knowledge and skills that residents have acquired [5]. Multiple programs have reduced the number of residents by 50%, reducing hospital training, and inadvertently increasing studying hours [6].
This study’s objective is to assess the knowledge and impact of COVID-19 on dermatology residents in different countries.
Informed consent was obtained from all those who participated in the study. The responses were anonymous. The survey (Appendix A) was used to assess the knowledge and impact of COVID-19. It consisted of four sections that contained 26 questions. Section one consisted of baseline information, section two was utilized to assess the knowledge regarding COVID-19, section three examined safety measures undertaken by the residents, and section four inquired about the impact of the pandemic on their training and education. Our questionnaire was predominantly adapted from a recently published study regarding the knowledge and impact of COVID-19 on neurosurgery residents [6].The questionnaire was then modified to address dermatology residents more specifically using US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and several other newly published studies. Additionally, more questions were added to the knowledge section to more accurately evaluate the residents’ awareness of the COVID-19 [7-11].
The knowledge section consisted of ten questions. The quantitative variable (total knowledge score) was calculated by adding the points of the ten knowledge items (each item equaled one point). The total knowledge score was then divided into satisfactory and non-satisfactory based on the number of correct answers each participant acquired from the ten questions. Those who accumulated a score above the mean were assigned into the satisfactory component, while those who scored at the mean or below were deemed to have a non-satisfactory knowledge score.
We used The Statistical Package for Social Sciences (IBM SPSS Statistics) for data entry and analysis. Qualitative variables were described by frequencies as well as percentages. This was done via the usage of univariate analysis. Next, parametric tests were utilized to determine the presence or absence of a significant correlation (p-value ≤0.05) between variables. These included Pearson’s Chi-square, Two-sample-t-test, and Analysis of variance (ANOVA).
The correct answers to the knowledge questions were as follows: 78% were aware of the RNA-single stranded nature of the virus, 86% understood the primary mode of transmission was via respiratory droplets, 71% answered fever and cough as being the two most common symptoms, and only 39% stated that the incubation period was approximately five days [11].Furthermore, only 27% of residents in the GCC region, and 62% in Canada are familiar with the preferred hand hygiene technique [13].Fiftyseven percent wore the PPE in the correct order of gown, mask, face shield, and gloves [14].The majority (83%) knew that polymerase
Characteristic |
|
|
n |
% |
|
Gender |
|
|
Male |
28 |
36.4 |
Female |
49 |
63.6 |
Location of the residency program |
|
|
Canada |
33 |
42.9 |
Kuwait |
18 |
23.4 |
Saudi Arabia |
14 |
18.2 |
Oman |
12 |
15.6 |
Year of the residency (R) training |
|
|
R1 |
13 |
16.9 |
R2 |
18 |
23.4 |
R3 |
17 |
22.1 |
R4 |
18 |
23.4 |
R5 |
11 |
14.3 |
Dermatology residents under quarantine |
|
|
Yes |
15 |
19.5 |
No |
62 |
80.5 |
Test for Coronavirus |
|
|
Positive |
1 |
1.3 |
Negative |
37 |
48.1 |
Not Tested |
39 |
50.6 |
Contact with COVID-19 patients |
|
|
Yes |
25 |
32.5 |
No |
52 |
67.5 |
= column % |
(Table 2) compares the correct response of the knowledge questions between the GCC countries and Canada. A significant difference was revealed among the two regions in five out of the ten questions. These items were as follows: the most common two symptoms, most accurate incubation period, preferred hand hygiene method, most common cutaneous manifestation, and most common Computed Tomography (CT) finding in COVID-19 patients. Also, residents in Canadian programs appear to have a higher percentage of correct answers than the GCC programs.
A knowledge score was generated in order to divide participants into two groups: satisfactory and non-satisfactory knowledge level. The mean knowledge score was 6.25, with a standard deviation (SD) of 1.6 (Figure 1). Table 3depicts the relation of the knowledge score with multiple characteristics. A significant difference can be appreciated when comparing the score of Canadian residents and GCC residents. Moreover, with regards to different Canadian provinces, it is reasonable to say that Nova Scotia and British Colombia had a lower score as opposed to Quebec and Alberta. When assessing the difference among GCC countries, Saudi Arabia had a higher Knowledge score mean (6.5) in contrast with Oman (5.5) and Kuwait (5.44).
Table 4 represents the impact of the pandemic on the residents. Seventy percent of the participants believed that their hospital training was negatively affected during the current time, while 30% experienced no change. Additionally, 43% acknowledged that their studying hours increased during this time, while 34% admitted a decrease. It should be further emphasized that the results were gathered three months after the WHO declared a COVID-19 pandemic, from June 4, 2020, until June 16, 2020.
Figure 2 highlights the location of the program and the satisfactory level of knowledge among the different regions. Out of the results, Canada contributed to around 26% of the participants with a satisfactory level of knowledge. However, among the GCC countries, this number was lower and as follows: Saudi Arabia 7.8%, Oman 6.5%, and Kuwait 5.2%, respectively. The percentage of participants with a non-satisfactory knowledge was highest in Kuwait (18%). Figure 3 displays the percentage of residents who believe that dermatology outpatient clinics should be closed during this time (63%).
Item |
All |
Location of the program |
p-value |
|
Canada |
GCC countries (n=44) |
|
||
|
n (%) |
n (%) |
n (%) |
|
Correct response to the knowledge items: |
|
|
||
The type of the virus |
60 (78) |
28 (85) |
32 (73) |
0.084 |
The main mode of transmission |
66 (86) |
30 (91) |
36 (82) |
0.514 |
The most common two |
55 (71) |
26 (79) |
29 (66) |
0.023 |
The most accurate estimated |
30 (39) |
15 (45) |
15 (34) |
0.004 |
The preferred hand hygiene |
32 (42) |
20 (61) |
12 (27) |
0.018 |
The correct order of wearing PPE |
44 (57) |
21 (64) |
23 (52) |
0.073 |
The most sensitive Diagnostic test |
64 (83) |
28 (85) |
36 (82) |
0.085 |
The most common cutaneous |
41 (53) |
19 (58) |
22 (50) |
0.036 |
Lab finding associated with worse |
21 (27) |
8 (24) |
13 (30) |
0.912 |
|
67 (87) |
31 (94) |
36 (82) |
0.006 |
|
|
Mean (SD) |
|
Gender |
|
0.390 |
Male |
6.04 (1.7) |
|
Female |
6.37 (1.5) |
|
Year of residency training* |
|
0.771 |
Residency years 1 |
6.00 (0.87) |
|
Residency years 2 |
6.44 (1.95) |
|
Residency years 3 |
5.94 (1.89) |
|
Residency years 4 |
6.56 (1.9) |
|
Residency years 5 |
6.18 (1.7) |
|
Location of the dermatology program |
|
0.035 |
Canada |
6.85 (1.34) |
|
GCC countries |
5.80 (1.77) |
|
Canadian provinces* |
|
0.017 |
Nova Scotia |
6.33 (2.4) |
|
Quebec |
7.00 (1.76) |
|
British Columbia |
6.50 (1.41) |
|
Alberta |
7.83 (0.75) |
|
GCC countries |
|
0.006 |
Saudi Arabia |
6.50 (1.02) |
|
Oman |
5.50 (1.51) |
|
Kuwait |
5.44 (1.29) |
|
Feeling competent in dealing with COVID-19 patients |
|
0.027 |
Yes |
6.27 (3) |
|
No |
6.24 (4) |
|
|
|
||
n |
% |
|
COVID-19 Pandemic has negatively affected my hospital training |
|
|
Yes |
54 |
70 |
No |
23 |
30 |
COVID-19 Pandemic has affected my studying hours |
|
|
Increase studying hours |
33 |
43 |
Decrease studying hours |
26 |
34 |
Not affected |
18 |
23 |
|
The knowledge level among the GCC and Canada has demonstrated to be statistically significantly different. The results display a higher level of knowledge among residents in Canadian programs, accentuating the need to educate dermatology residents in the GCC region. Among different Canadian provinces, British Colombia and Nova Scotia had a lower mean level of knowledge (6.5 & 6.3, respectively). Although this difference might only be statistically, and not clinically significant,the possibilityfor the need of further educating residents among these two provinces, regarding COVID-19, must be considered. The variance between the provinces can also be attributed to COVID-19 patients in Quebec and Alberta compared to the other provinces[17].
Many universities have shut down during this period, and hence classical lectures, seminars, bedside teaching have been ceased [18].Consequently, residency programs have resorted to online platforms and webinars. Although these alternatives can never replace the need for face to face education, they are fundamental to minimalizing disruption of education and providing necessary courses, especially to regions with a lower level of knowledge regarding COVID-19, proper PPE usage, and hand hygiene. Two papers reported that 52% of healthcare students and professionals, and 52% of neurosurgery residents were familiar with the preferred hand hygiene [6,19].A recent study on COVID-19 and final year medical students’ awareness reported that 38% of the respondents were aware of the preferred method of hand hygiene in health care settings [20].However, our results showed that only 27% of residents in GCC countries and 62% of Canada’s residents knew the ideal hand hygiene method. Correct hand hygiene practices play a crucial role in preventing the spread of infection.
Multiple dermatology practices are now using telemedicine to limit infection rates. While this is advantageous, it can alter the clinic workflow and compromise dermatology resident hospital education. Roughly 70% of residents in our study have stated that the pandemic had negatively affected their hospital training. A studyexamining the impact of COVID-19 on radiology residents revealed that the hospital training of 87.4% of responders wasaffected[21].Regardless of this adverse effect, almost 63% of participants believe that outpatient clinics should be closed during this time.Even though the COVID-19 pandemic is seen as unfavorable for residents, it has a positive effect. Almost 43% of residents have experienced an increase in studying hours. This study has several limitations. Due to the nature of cross-sectional studies, a temporal relationship between the knowledge score and various characteristics among the residents would be impossible to establish. Residency programs in other nations were not included, and therefore it would be irrational to generalize the results on dermatology residents world-wide.
- Wu Z, McGoogan JM. Characteristics of and Important Lessons from the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Outbreak in China: Summary of a Report of 72 314 Cases from the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention. JAMA. 2020;10:2648. doi:10.1001/jama.2020.2648
- Bhargava S, Rokde R, Rathod D, Kroumpouzos G. Employing dermatologists on the frontline against COVID-19: All hands on deck. DermatolTher. 2020;e13420.
- Ferrel MN, Ryan JJ. The Impact of COVID-19 on Medical Education. Cureus. 2020;12(3):e7492.
- Oldenburg R, Marsch A. Optimizing teledermatology visits for dermatology resident education during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Am AcadDermatol. 2020;82(6):e229. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2020.03.097
- Potts JR 3rd. Residency and Fellowship Program Accreditation: Effects of the Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19) Pandemic. J Am Coll Surg. 2020;230(6):1094‐1097. doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2020.03.026
- Alhaj AK, Al-Saadi T, Mohammad F, Alabri S. Neurosurgery Residents' Perspective on COVID-19: Knowledge, Readiness, and Impact of this Pandemic World. Neurosurg. 2020.
- Wang D, Hu B, Hu C. Clinical Characteristics of 138 Hospitalized Patients with 2019 Novel Coronavirus-Infected Pneumonia in Wuhan, China. JAMA. 2020;323(11):1061‐1069.
- Ghazal S, Litvinov IV, Aljahani N, Jfri A, Netchiporouk E. Cutaneous Manifestations of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Infection-What Do We Know So Far? J Cutan Med Surg. 2020:1203475420928375.
- Wu C, Chen X, Cai Y. Risk Factors Associated With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome and Death in Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pneumonia in Wuhan, China. JAMA Intern Med. 2020;e200994.
- Chan JF, Choi GK, Tsang AK, Tee KM, Lam HY, et al. Development and evaluation of novel real-time reverse transcription-PCR Assays with locked nucleic acid probes targeting leader sequences of human-pathogenic Coronaviruses. J ClinMicrobiol. 2015;53(8):2722–2726.
- Information for healthcare professionals. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2020.
- Nassim, David, Abdulhadi, Litvinov, Netchiporouk. Preliminary Data Suggests That Biologics in Dermatology Are Not Associated With Adverse COVID-19 Outcomes. Journal of Cutaneous Medicine and Surgery. 2020.
- Frequently asked questions about hand hygiene for healthcare personnel responding to COVID-2019. 2020.
- Sequence for putting on personal protective equipment (PPE). 2020.
- Bao C, Liu X, Zhang H, Li Y, Liu J. Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) CT Findings: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Am CollRadiol. 2020;17(6):701-709.
- Stoj VJ, Grant-Kels JM. Dermatology residents and the care of patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). J Am AcadDermatol. 2020;82(6):1572-1573.
- Public Canada. Coronavirus disease (COVID-19): Outbreak update-Canada. 2020.
- Wollina U. Challenges of COVID-19 pandemic for dermatology. DermatolTher. 2020;e13430.
- Modi P D, Nair G, Uppe A. COVID-19 awareness among healthcare atudents and professionals in Mumbai Metropolitan region: A questionnaire-based survey. Cureus. 2020;12(4):e7514.
- Al-Saadi H, Al-Busaidi F, Al-Kalbani M, Al-Abri S, Malallah H, et al. COVD-19 And Final Year Medical Students’ Learning Process In Oman: Exploring Knowledge, Consequences And Preparedness For Internship. European Journal of Medical and Health Sciences. 2020;2(3).
- Matthew D, Elizabeth G, Francis D. The Impact of COVID-19 on Radiology Trainees. Radiology. 2020;27:201222