2Biocode Medical Laboratories, Chiamaka Plaza Aroma junction Awka Nigeria
3Department of Family and Community Medicine, Texas Tech University and Lamb Health Care Center, Littlefield, TX 79339, USA; Siouxland Medical Educational Foundation and Siouxland Community Health Center, Sioux City, IA 51104, USA
Keywords: Hepatis B Vaccines; Nigeria; Commercially Available; Efficacy; Immunogenicity; Safety;
Hepatitis B recombinant Vaccine (HBV) is a preparation of purified hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) that has been produced by recombinant DNA techniques. The preparation should satisfy all the production and quality control requirements [14]. General requirements, such as tests for potency, purity, toxicity, pyrogenicity, and sterility will apply as much to hepatitis B vaccines made by recombinant DNA methods [15]. Generally, there are side effects associated with HBV. Reactions, such as local pain, myalgia and transient fever occur mostly within 24 hours. There are also documented cases of fever, rash, soreness or swelling where the shot was given, or temporary pain and stiffness in the joints [16,17].
The quality of hepatitis B vaccines marketed in open markets in Nigeria is a growing concern as the country wages war against sub-standard drugs especially as the country does not manufacture such immunological product, but rely heavily on the importation of these products. The number of pharmaceuticals imported has more than doubled in the past decades [14,18]. The globalization of pharmaceutical industries supply chain appears to be increasing, and as such, increasing the risk of pharmaceutical consumers being exposed to drug products or immunologic products that have been contaminated, counterfeited or mislabelled [14]. In addition, economically motivated adulteration of pharmaceutical raw materials is on the rise [15,19]. Hence, the chances of the purchase and usage of these products that may be fake, substandard, adulterated, contaminated, counterfeited or mislabeled are high. The overall effect of these is that a patient may not obtain the desired effect at the required time [16,20]. This study was therefore designed to determine the compliance of different brands of Hepatitis B vaccines marketed in open markets across South-Eastern Nigeria with Pharmacopoeial standards for safety and immunogenicity. It is our expectation that the results of this study will provide safety and immunologic information on Hepatitis B vaccines commercially available in South Eastern Nigerian markets.
Briefly, 0.1ml of test animal serum and 0.5ml of 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine were mixed and followed by incubation at 37°C for 30 min. The colour reagent (0.5ml) was added and the mixture was mixed properly and allowed to stand at room temperature for another 20 min. After which 5 ml of 0.4 M NaOH solution was added to terminate the reaction. The absorbance was read at 546 nm against the blank after 5 min.
The activity of the enzyme was extrapolated from the standard calibration curve obtained from an absorbance-enzyme activity table of values provided by the manufacturer. Enzyme activity was expressed in IU/L protein. One unit of alanine aminotransferase activity was defined as the amount of protein that liberated one micromole (1μm) of pyruvate per ml / min under experimental condition.
Growth Conditions |
Test Organisms |
Growth Medium |
Brands of vaccines |
Controls |
||||||
|
|
|
Hepavax 1 |
Hepavax 2 |
Sii |
Euvax 1 |
Euvax 2 |
Engerix |
Positive |
Negative |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aerobic |
E. coli |
Nutrient Broth |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
+ |
- |
|
A. niger |
Sabouraud Dextrose Broth |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
+ |
- |
Anaerobic |
Clostridium sp |
Thioglycollate Medium |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
+ |
- |
|
|
A |
B |
C |
D |
E |
F |
G |
H |
WBC Before Immunization |
Mean |
56.7 |
64.5 |
69.6 |
55.2 |
63.9 |
65.7 |
65.6 |
64.7 |
SD |
2.86 |
7.05 |
5.87 |
4.24 |
6.06 |
4.08 |
4.55 |
7.41 |
|
After Immunization (18 hrs) |
Mean |
67.7 |
72.1 |
73.3 |
67.6 |
71.2 |
58.4 |
37.5 |
71.3 |
SD |
12.57 |
8.45 |
3.59 |
4.45 |
9.62 |
7.97 |
4.27 |
8.01 |
|
After Immunization (72 hrs) |
Mean |
74 |
86.3 |
72.6 |
64.6 |
72.1 |
82.8 |
34.3 |
57.5 |
SD |
4.16 |
11.34 |
6.06 |
7.82 |
12.21 |
5.49 |
5.52 |
6.84 |
|
P-value |
|
0.81 |
0.26 |
0.15 |
0.73 |
0.39 |
0.15 |
0.62 |
NA |
Brands |
Day 1 |
Day 2 |
Day 3 |
Day 4 |
Day 5 |
Day 6 |
Day 7 |
Day 8 |
|
Hepava1 |
Mean |
22.22 |
22.19 |
21.17 |
22.03 |
22.2 |
23.46 |
23.49 |
24.31 |
SD |
2.6 |
2.61 |
2.58 |
2.71 |
2.78 |
2.91 |
3.02 |
2.83 |
|
Sii |
Mean |
24.75 |
25.99 |
25.73 |
27.15 |
25.22 |
26.44 |
26.56 |
27.2 |
SD |
2.49 |
2.6 |
2.49 |
2.5 |
2.6 |
2.7 |
2.55 |
2.53 |
|
Euvax 1 |
Mean |
22.37 |
21.97 |
21.72 |
23.05 |
22.36 |
21.57 |
21.42 |
21.84 |
SD |
2.68 |
2.94 |
2.89 |
3.11 |
3.07 |
2.96 |
2.9 |
2.96 |
|
Euvax 2 |
Mean |
23.05 |
22.6 |
22.76 |
24.04 |
24.41 |
25.15 |
23.48 |
24.5 |
SD |
7.04 |
6.57 |
6.51 |
6.6 |
6.45 |
6.42 |
5.55 |
5.57 |
|
Hepavax 2 |
Mean |
25.91 |
25.67 |
26.22 |
28.31 |
27.61 |
29.1 |
28.8 |
29.34 |
SD |
2.81 |
3.43 |
3.34 |
3.36 |
3.2 |
3.29 |
3.43 |
3.49 |
|
Engerix |
Mean |
24.96 |
23.6 |
25.18 |
24.44 |
24.67 |
24.67 |
24.83 |
25.22 |
SD |
3.67 |
3.12 |
3.32 |
3.18 |
3.051 |
3.05 |
3.05 |
3.08 |
|
Cyclophosphamide |
Mean |
23.32 |
23.84 |
22.45 |
23.05 |
21.94 |
21.38 |
20.12 |
20.73 |
SD |
3 |
2.94 |
3.49 |
3.06 |
3.15 |
3.16 |
3.03 |
2.93 |
|
Normal saline |
Mean |
23.49 |
24.37 |
23.2 |
23.52 |
23.08 |
24.5 |
23.14 |
24.13 |
SD |
2.15 |
3.16 |
3.34 |
3.21 |
3.33 |
3.47 |
3.47 |
3.33 |
Brands |
Mean Optical density (OD) |
Mean OD of Samples - Mean OD of Blank |
Mean OD of sample /Mean OD of negative control |
Immunogenicity |
Hepavax |
0.3824 |
0.3379 |
4.118 |
Positive |
Sii |
0.7067 |
0.6622 |
8.0695 |
Positive |
Euvax 1 |
0.5747 |
0.5303 |
6.4611 |
Positive |
Euvax 2 |
0.7844 |
0.7399 |
9.0161 |
Positive |
Hepavax 2 |
0.6752 |
0.6308 |
7.6856 |
Positive |
Engerix |
0.5402 |
0.4958 |
6.0407 |
Positive |
Cyclophosphamide |
0.1751 |
0.1307 |
1.5921 |
Negative |
Normal saline |
0.1583 |
0.1139 |
1.3875 |
Negative |
Blank |
0.044429 |
0 |
NA |
NA |
Positive control |
1.216 |
1.1716 |
NA |
NA |
Negative control |
0.1265 |
0.0821 |
NA |
NA |
OD (sample/OD (negative control) < 2.1: Negative NA: Not applicable
Brands |
Sterility Test |
Endotoxin test |
ALT test |
TWBC count |
Body weight change test |
Potency/Immunogenicity testing |
Hepavax 1 |
Pass |
Pass |
Satisfactory |
Satisfactory |
Satisfactory |
Immunogenic |
Hepavax 2 |
Pass |
Pass |
Satisfactory |
Satisfactory |
Satisfactory |
Immunogenic |
Sii |
Pass |
Pass |
Satisfactory |
Satisfactory |
Satisfactory |
Immunogenic |
Euvax 1 |
Pass |
Pass |
Satisfactory |
Satisfactory |
Unsatisfactory |
Immunogenic |
Euvax 2 |
Pass |
Pass |
Satisfactory |
Satisfactory |
Satisfactory |
Immunogenic |
Engerix |
Pass |
Pass |
Satisfactory |
Satisfactory |
Satisfactory |
Immunogenic |
WHO has developed recommendations for ensuring quality, safety and efficacy of recombinant hepatitis B vaccines [10,16,17]. The Limulus amoebocyte lysate (LAL) test is currently employed to detect and quantify endotoxins in various biological products for parenteral administration and this test is widely used as a convenient method due to its high sensitivity, its reliability and its simple handling [29]. All the brands of Hepatitis B vaccines were endotoxin free (Table 5). Yihui, et al. stated that endotoxins should be completely removed in the final products for parenteral administration because of the high toxicity; hence, the determination for amounts of remaining endotoxin in these products is of great importance [29]. The monitoring and reporting of endotoxins and other contaminants in vaccines might be useful in understanding some of the adverse effects observed in vaccine recipients. Among many quality control tests, conventional animal safety tests are performed to detect vaccine toxicity because residual vaccine toxicity has the potential to cause adverse reactions [30]. The safety of vaccines has been assessed using several animal tests, including the body weight change test and white blood cell counts [31,32]. European Union recommends that vaccines be considered safe only after testing according to laid down procedures. They recommended that the assessment of safety in the target species should be based on clinical reaction and laboratory animals’ weight gain compared with unvaccinated controls [32,33]. In our findings, except the animal groups treated with Euvax 1 brand and cyclophosphamide which recorded reduction in weight on the eight day after administration, other groups of test animals administered with the other vaccine brands recorded weight gain on the eight day after vaccine administration (Table 3). The loss in the weight recorded by the animals that received the Euvax 1 is a concern, since all the animals were given same food and kept in the same environment. It could be that the vaccine was safe at the time of collection and/or may have been affected by any slight breech in the cold-chain since vaccines are biological products and failures are bound to occur when vaccines are mishandled / not refrigerated [34]. The body weight change test has been used to infer the toxicity of substances and a good correlation of the body weight loss with a vaccine’s toxicity has been shown [35]. Good vaccines should not cause a decrease in the weight of the mice 3 days post-vaccination, produce a less than 60% mean weight gain per mice compared with the control at 7 days postvaccination or greater than 5% animal death during the 7 days observation period nor any sign of illness on the animals [36,37]. Similarly, the Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) test was used to evaluate the liver toxicity of the vaccine brands. ALT is an enzyme present in hepatocytes and is a marker of liver cell inflammation [38,39]. ALT is typically elevated in individuals with acute viral hepatitis and it rises dramatically in acute liver damage [39]. Elevations are often measured in multiples of the upper limit of normal (9 to 60μg/L) [38]. In this study there was no statistically significant difference (P > 0.05) between the ALT levels produced by various vaccine brands and the control (Figure 1). Sustained and intermittent elevations in ALT beyond the upper limit of normal are indicative of hepatic inflammation and correlate with an increased risk of progressive liver disease [40]. Therefore all the vaccine brands tested are safe to the liver. The safety of the vaccines may be attributed to good storage conditions, the absence of residual toxin and chemicals in the vaccines and lack of degradation products in the vaccines.
Vaccines serve to protect the recipients by eliciting antibodies in the serum that prevent infection, microbial spread and/or nullify pathogenic toxins [25]. The potency of the various HBV brands was assessed by immunization experiment in which the antibody responses of mice were determined by ELISA techniques after administering the same dose ( 0.5mL of 4ug/ mL) of the vaccines brands to groups of mice intraperitoneallly. The potency of the various HBV brands is directly related to their immunogenicity. All the vaccines tested were immunogenic as their ratio of Optical density (sample) to that of negative control is ≥ 2.1.
- Ochu CL, Beynon CM. Hepatitis B vaccination coverage, knowledge and sociodemographic determinants of uptake in high risk public safety workers in Kaduna State, Nigeria: a cross sectional survey. BMJ Open.2017;7(5):e015845.
- Elke L, Pierre Van D. Hepatitis B and the Need for a Booster Dose. Clin Infect Dis. 2011;53(1):68-75.
- Posuwan N, Wanlapakorn N, Sa-nguanmoo P, Wasitthankasem R, Vichaiwattana P, Klinfueng S, et al. The Success of a Universal Hepatitis B Immunization Program as Part of Thailand’s EPI after 22 Years’ Implementation. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(3):e0150499.
- Alegbeleye JO, Nyengidiki TK, Ikimalo JI. Maternal and neonatal seroprevalence of hepatitis B surface antigen in a hospital based population in South-South, Nigeria. 2013;5(5):241-246.
- Olutomi YS, Bassey E. An appraisal of the prevention of mother-to-child transmission of hepatitis B virus health system in Nigeria. J. Public Health Epidemiol. 2017;9(12):309-317.
- WHO. Department of Communicable Diseases Surveillance and Response. Hepatitis B. 2002;
- Peters M, Vierling J, Gershwin ME, Milich D, Chisari FV, Hoofnagle JH. Immunology and the liver.Hepatology. 1991;13( 5):977-994.
- Shepard CW, Simard EP, Finelli L, Fiore AE, Bell BP. Hepatits virus infection: Epidemiology and vaccination. Epidemiol Rev. 2006;28:112-125.
- Loggi E. Vitale G, Conti F, Bernardi M, Andreone P. Chronic hepatitis B: Are we close to a cure? Digestive and Liver Disease. 2015;47(10)836-841.
- Van Damme P, et al. Hepatitis B Vaccines, In Vaccines 6th Edition. Plotkin SA, Orenstein WA, Offit PA editors, Elsevier Sanders, 2017;
- Ogholikhan S, Schwarz KB. Hepatitis Vaccines. Vaccines. 2016;4(6):1-17.
- Kosinska AD, Zhang E, Lu M, Roggendorf M. Therapeutic Vaccination in Chronic Hepatitis B: Preclinical Studies in the Woodchuck. Hepatitis Research and Treatment. 2010(2010):1-17.
- Yano Y. Hepatitis B Vaccines;Efficacy and Necessity of Booster Immunizations. J Hep. 2016;2:1.
- Bankole AM, Kola-Korolo O, Bankole MO, Iboma G, Adebowale OA, Lukeman AJS, et al. The impact of health facility monitoring on cold chain management practices in Lagos, Nigeria. Journal of Public Health and Epidemiology Vol. 2010;2(4):78-81.
- Park CY, Jung SH, Bak JP, Lee SS, Rhee DK. Comparison of the rabbit pyrogen test and Limulus amoebocyte lysate (LAL) assay for endotoxin in hepatitis B vaccines and the effect of aluminium hydroxide. Biologicals. 2005;33(3):145-151.
- WHO Information sheet on observed rate of vaccine reactions , Hepatitis B Vaccines . Global Vaccine Safety ,immunization vaccines and biologicals 20 Avenue Appia ,CH-1211, Geneva 27.
- WHO Recommendations to assure the quality, safety and efficacy of recombinant hepatitis B vaccines. WHO Technical report series No. 978. World Health Organization, Geneva. 2013;
- Lutter R. Addressing Challenges of Economically-Motivated Adulteration. Public Meeting on Economically Motivated Adulteration, College Park, MD. 2009;
- Coukell A. Protecting Consumers from Adultrated Drugs, Public Meeting on Economically Motivated Adulteration. NewsEvent. College Park, MD 2009;
- Bakare-Odunola MT, Balat L. Quality of some brand of chloroquine tablet available in Nigeria. Nigerian Journal of Pharmaceutical Research. 2006;5(1):22-26.
- European Pharmacopeia. A 5.1. Vaccines. 2006;04(2005):0153.
- Haruka M, Takuo M, Masaki O, Isao H, and Kazunari Y. A new method for the evaluation of vaccine safety based on comprehensive gene expression analysis. J. Biomed. Biotechnol. 2010;7:Article ID 361841.
- Reitman, S. and Frankel S. A colorimetric method for the determination of glutamic oxaloacetic and glutamic pyruvic transaminases. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 1957;28(1):56-63.
- Schalm OW, Jain NC, Carroll EJ. Determination of Total Leukocyte Count. Veterinary Haematology,3rd edition. Philadelphia, Lea & Febiger. 1975;19-25.
- Chigozie VU, Eze, PM, Chukwunwejim CR, Abba CC, Nworu CS, Esimone CO .Quality Assessment of Some Brands of Tetanus Toxoids Marketed in Open Markets in South-Eastern Nigeria. British Journal of Pharmaceutical Research. 2014;4(13):1657-1667.
- MahboubiA, FazeliMR, SamadiN, Dinarvand R, Azadi S. Evaluation of Thimerosal Removal on Immunogenicity of Aluminum Salts Adjuvanted Recombinant Hepatitis B Vaccine. Iranian Journal of Pharmaceutical Research. 2012;11(1):39-46.
- Luo Z, Li L, Ruan B. Impact of the implementation of a vaccination strategy on hepatitis B virus infections in China over a 20-year period. Int J Infect Dis. 2012;16(2):82-88.
- Trehanpati N, Hissar S, Shrivastav S, Sarin SK . Immunological mechanisms of hepatitis B virus persistencein newborns. Indian J Med Res. 2013;138(5):700-710.
- Yihui H, Zi’an M, Yueqing C, Liming J, Yongxue L, Haiying H. Detection of Bacterial Endotoxin in Rabies Vaccine by the Gel-clot Assay with Tachypleus Amoebocyte Lysate. Journal of Applied Virology. 2012;1(1):19-26.
- Stevens CE , Toy P, Kamili S, Taylor PE, Tong MJ , Guo-Liang X , Vyas GN. Eradicating hepatitis B virus: The critical role of preventing perinatal transmission, Biologicals. 2017;50:3-19.
- Horiuchi Y, Takahashi M, Konda T. Quality control of diphtheria tetanus acellular pertussis combined (DTaP) vaccines in Japan,”Japanese Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2001;54(5):167–180.
- Momose H, Mizukami T, Ochiai M, Hamaguchi I, Yamaguchi K. A New Method for the Evaluation of Vaccine Safety Based on Comprehensive Gene Expression Analysis. Journal of Biomedicine and Biotechnology. 2010;2010:1-7.
- Oli AN, Oli UC, Ejiofor OS, Nwoye CU, Esimone CO. An assessment, in mice, of the safety of the childhood immunization vaccines sourced from three south-eastern states of Nigeria .Trials in Vaccinology. 2016;5:8–14.
- Chapman HDB. Roberts, M.W. Shirley, R.B. Williams. Guidelines for evaluating the efficacy and safety of live anticoccidial vaccines, and obtaining approval for their use in chickens and turkeys, Avian Pathol. 2005;34(4):279–290.
- Mizukami T, Masumi A, Momose H. An improved abnormal toxicity test by using reference vaccine-specific body weight curves and histopathological data for monitoring vaccine quality and safety in Japan,” Biologicals. 2009;37(1):8–17.
- Kurata K. Minimum Requirements for Biological Products, Tokyo, Japan, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, 2006;
- Singh GN. Diphtheria and tetanus and whole cell pertussis vaccine (Adsorbed), Indian Pharmacopoeia. 2007;3(3):744-757.
- Nyblom H, Bjornsson E, Simren M, Aldenborg F, Almer S, Olsson R. “The AST/ALT ratio as an indicator of cirrhosis in patients with PBC”. Liver Int. 2006;26(7):840-845.
- Dufour DR, Lott JA, Nolte FS, Gretch DR, Koff RS, Seeff LB. Diagnosis and monitoring of hepatic injury. I. Performance characteristics of laboratory tests. Clin Chem. 2000;46:2027-2049.
- Wai CT, Lok AS. Treatment of hepatitis B. J Gastroenterol. 2002;37(10):771-778.