Keywords: Induced secondary voltage; Ferro magnetic Core; Inductance; Primary Coil; Secondary Coil
The voltage to primary coils is supplied by a variac of 220V and 15 amps. The voltages and currents in primary and secondary circuits are measured using digital multimeter.
Core Number |
VP(volts) |
IP(Amperes) |
VS(volts) |
IS(Amperes) |
IP’(Amperes) |
cosΦ |
PP=VPIP cosΦ(watts) |
PP’=VPIP’cosΦ(watts) |
α=PP/VS (jouls/volt) |
β=PP’/IS(jolus/Ampere) |
P1 |
15 |
12.17 |
15.8 |
0.0151 |
11.8 |
1 |
190.5 |
177 |
12.05 |
11800 |
P1+P2 |
15 |
3.94 |
33.0 |
0.037 |
3.9 |
0.57 |
33.687 |
33.34 |
0.7 |
901 |
P1+P2+P3 |
15 |
1.24 |
45.1 |
0.2 |
1.6 |
0.86 |
16.163 |
20.856 |
0.36 |
104 |
P1+P2+P3+P4 |
15 |
0.59 |
49.7 |
0.4 |
1.62 |
0.79 |
6.99 |
19.2 |
0.14 |
48 |
P1+P2+P3+P4+P5 |
15 |
0.23 |
51.5 |
0.52 |
1.94 |
0.65 |
2.24 |
18.9 |
0.043 |
36.34 |
P1+P2+P3+P4+P5+P6 |
15 |
0.15 |
52.5 |
0.59 |
2.11 |
0.41 |
0.922 |
12.97 |
0.017 |
1.56 |
In Table II is shown variation of IP, VS, IS and IP’ with variation of primary voltage for a single primary coil P1 similar results for 4 and 6 primaries are shown in Tables III and Table IV.
In Table V is shown the variation of IP, VL and IL with variation of cores from 1 to 6 for a primary voltage of 15.5 volts. The load resistance is 52 Ω. The input power PIN and output PL is calculated as shown in the table. The ratio of PL to Pin gives efficiency and it is also shown in the Table V.
In Table VI and Table VII are shown the results of OC and SC tests for all the earlier combination of cores.
VP(volts) |
IP(Amperes) |
VS(volts) |
IS(Amperes |
IP’(Amperes) |
1.51 |
0.066 |
5.27 |
6.2 |
85 |
4.5 |
1.15 |
12.7 |
12.3 |
1.03 |
10.13 |
7.1 |
15.2 |
14.6 |
7.0 |
15.1 |
11.9 |
15.4 |
15.1 |
11.73 |
VP(volts) |
IP(Amperes) |
VS(volts) |
IS(Amperes) |
IP’(Amperes) |
1.64 |
27.7 |
5.5 |
11.1 |
63.7 |
1.49 |
61.7 |
16.56 |
28.3 |
157 |
10.2 |
153 |
34.5 |
171.5 |
0.73 |
15.15 |
0.56 |
49.1 |
0.37 |
1.5 |
20.1 |
1.39 |
61.5 |
0.63 |
2.6 |
25.1 |
2.66 |
70.0 |
0.89 |
3.73 |
31.6 |
4.60 |
73.2 |
1.2 |
5.3 |
41.1 |
7.44 |
76.1 |
1.63 |
7.7 |
52.5 |
10.54 |
78.5 |
1.96 |
10.52 |
VP(volts) |
IP(Amperes) |
VS(volts) |
IS(Amperes) |
IP’(Amperes) |
1.6 |
0.0214 |
5.6 |
0.0432 |
0.1532 |
4.1 |
0.0408 |
14.1 |
0.1051 |
0.46 |
10.5 |
0.0851 |
35.4 |
0.41 |
1.49 |
15.3 |
0.15 |
52.4 |
0.6 |
2.14 |
20.4 |
0.38 |
69.2 |
0.81 |
2.92 |
25.7 |
0.9 |
84.6 |
1.02 |
3.7 |
30.5 |
1.4 |
97.9 |
1.25 |
4.54 |
35.1 |
2.19 |
108 |
1.45 |
5.23 |
40.2 |
3.16 |
114 |
1.66 |
6.00 |
50.7 |
5.17 |
118 |
2.12 |
7.7 |
60.1 |
6.87 |
121 |
2.46 |
9.03 |
85.1 |
10.26 |
123.3 |
3.06 |
11.27 |
No of Coils |
VP(volts) |
IP(Amperes) |
Pin= VPIP cosΦ(watts) |
VL(volts) |
IL(Amperes) |
PL= VLIL (watts) |
Ƞ=PL/PE |
P1 |
16.9 |
17 |
100 |
0.809 |
0.0159 |
0.12 |
1.2 |
P1+P2 |
19.7 |
8.06 |
100 |
2.08 |
0.0414 |
0.0886 |
8.6 |
P1+P2+P3 |
26.3 |
6.67 |
100 |
14.77 |
0.29 |
4.3 |
4.3 |
P1+P2+P3+P4 |
31.4 |
5.55 |
100 |
31.1 |
0.61 |
18.9 |
19 |
P1+P2+P3+P4+P5 |
34.2 |
4.67 |
100 |
42.1 |
0.84 |
35.36 |
35 |
P1+P2+P3+P4+P5+P6 |
34.3 |
4.24 |
100 |
45.6 |
0.89 |
40.6 |
40 |
No of Coils |
VOC(volts) |
IOC(amperes) |
Power |
Power factor |
2 |
33.6 |
13.74 |
264 |
0.57 |
3 |
35.6 |
9.37 |
290 |
0.86 |
4 |
37.3 |
6.44 |
190 |
0.79 |
5 |
38.4 |
4.4 |
110 |
0.65 |
6 |
39.3 |
3.1 |
50 |
0.41 |
No of Coils |
VSC |
ISC |
Power |
1 |
11.4 |
8.5 |
100 |
2 |
24.1 |
9.07 |
200 |
3 |
25.8 |
5.6 |
100 |
4 |
26.4 |
4.34 |
100 |
5 |
26.5 |
4.27 |
100 |
6 |
26.6 |
4.22 |
100 |
As seen from Tables II, Tables III and Tables IV the range of operation before saturation is increasing as primary cores are increasing. The maximum voltage for a single core is 15.2 volts, for four cores 52.5 volts and for six cores 85 volts.
Table V shows that the power transferred to the load increases as the number of cores are increasing (The primary is remaining constant). The efficiency increases with multiple cores.
- R.Subrahmanyam. Temperature coefficients of permeability and induced EMF in ferro magnetic Material. J.pure Appl. Phys. 2009;21(2):273-280.
- R.Subrahmanyam. Effect of Aluminium Enclosures on Induced EMF. Procedia Materials Science. 2014;6:444-449