2Department of Nursing, Nevsehir Haci Bektas Veli University, Nevsehir-Turkey
Methods: The women who applied between 1 January to 31 December 2013 constituted the universe of the study and also, 1087 women who applied between 1 October to 31 December 2013 and was taken Pap smear constituted the sample of this study. Data was collected by investigating CEDSEC polyclinic documents and cervical cancer Screening and Consent Forms records. Data was evaluated at computer by using SSPS 15.0 (Statistical Program for Social Sciences) package program for analysis, percentage, mean, chi-square and standard deviation. In every stage of the study it is taken care to follow ethical principles. Ethical Council Consent from Nevsehir Haci Bektas Veli University and written consent from Nevsehir City Public Health Directorate.
Results: It is determined that 39.1% of the women were between 40-49 years old and older than 40 years got pap smear tests. When their pap smear outcomes were investigated, it is found that 0.3% of them got ASCUS, 0.3% of them got HGSIL. While women aged over 60 who HSIL result of the study we see that before the age of 60 women with ASCUS.
Conclusion: In our study, the woman with HGSIL was older than the others who had ASCUS. This result shows the importance of early diagnosis and screening. For being protected from cervical cancer, to know the factors that could be causes for this disease and importance of early diagnosis are important in terms of taking required measures. Giving educations about this subject to society, especially, groups that under risk, composing awareness related to increase to participation to the screening programs are important roles of nurses.
Keywords: Woman health; Cervical cancer; Screening; Pap smear test
World Health Organization (WHO) is suggested to be cooperated with themselves for improving programs that increasing quality of life of patients and their families and decreasing cancer mortalities in countries especially with low/ middle income, in 2005 at 58 World Health Council. WHO advise to countries to integrate their cancer control program in health system and improve the programs that evidence based in cancer diagnosis and treatment and sources could be used more efficient in [4]. In Turkey, cervical cancer screening program is done by Turkey Public Health Institute Family Health Centers and Cancer Early Diagnosis, Screening and Education Centers (CEDSEC) in Public Health Centers. There are 126 CEDSEC and 7 of them are mobile. Total numbers of CEDSEC are aimed to be 280 in the late of 2018. At CEDSEC the pap smear screening tests of 30- 65 aged women, outcomes are followed up, and they who are determined as pathologic are directed to women diseases doctors. Screening continues in every 5 years when the outcomes are good [3]. In a lot of studies, it is determined that with Pap smear test preinvasive numbers was more than invasive one [5-10]. These results show a real that early treatment could decrease cervical cancer incidence.
Cervical cancer is at the beginning of the cancers that could be prevented with early diagnosis at women. Until pap smear test is used for early diagnosis and especially in the last 40 years, screening programs are improved in a lot of countries and so, an important decrease has been recorded at invasive cervical cancer incidence. Cervical cancer screening with Pap smear test increased invasive disease diagnosis with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and decreased cervical cancer incidence and mortality. In any place of the World, incidence and mortality of cervical cancer could not be decreased without an active screening program [11,12].
Surgical, radiotherapy and chemotherapy are used in cervical cancer treatment. The most important factor that could determine its prognosis is early diagnosis and when the examination is done as advised it is impossible to determine the cases more than 90% of them [13]. Cervical cancer screening programs are important in our country, too. To know outcomes of screening tests is important in terms of show the way to recognize the importance of screening tests with further plans and scientific studies. So, this study is aimed to investigate cervical cancer screening outcomes.
In CEDSEC polyclinic documents there are some information's as follows; protocol number, name-surname of the women, date of applying, age, region that come from, wanted tests and outcomes of tests (pap-smear).
Cervical cancer screening and consent forms were constituted of 26 questions included in socio demographic, obstetric and gynecological characteristics of the women.
Mean ages for menarche of them was 13.60 ± 1.40. The first
Characteristics |
n |
% |
Age ( n :1087) |
||
30-39 years |
69 |
6.3 |
40-49 years |
425 |
39.1 |
50-59 years |
428 |
39.4 |
60 years and over |
165 |
15.2 |
Lived region ( n :1087) |
||
City |
101 |
9.3 |
Town |
276 |
25.4 |
Village |
710 |
65.3 |
Social guarantee ( n :830 )* |
||
Yes |
707 |
85.2 |
No |
123 |
14.8 |
Marriage status ( n :707 )* |
|
|
Married |
674 |
91.5 |
Divorced |
63 |
8.5 |
Education status ( n : 683 )* |
||
Illiterate |
107 |
15.7 |
Primary school |
523 |
76.6 |
Secondary school |
21 |
3.1 |
High school |
24 |
3.5 |
University and up |
8 |
1.2 |
Occupation ( n : 622 )* |
||
House worker |
608 |
97.7 |
Officer |
14 |
2.3 |
Smoking ( n : 860 )* |
||
Smoke |
44 |
5.1 |
Not smoke |
816 |
94.9 |
Drinking alcohol ( n : 772 )* |
|
|
Not to drink |
772 |
100 |
First marriage age ( n : 863 )* |
||
13-19 years |
662 |
76.5 |
20-26 years |
184 |
21.3 |
27 years old and over |
17 |
2.0 |
Number of marriage ( n : 862 )* |
||
1 |
835 |
96.9 |
2 and more |
27 |
3.1 |
It is determined that of the women; 91.5% didn't take hormone therapy, 62.7% didn't use any continuous medicine, 61.6% didn't have got a chronic disease, 93.2% wasn't patients as gynecological, 8% had breast cancer in her family, 3.9% had gynecological cancer in her family (Table 3) .
When their pap smear outcomes were investigated, it is found that 0.3% of them got ASCUS, 0.3% of them got HGSIL (Table 4). The 3 women with HGSIL were 60-64 aged and they were living in the village. There weren't any records related with other information's. Again, for the 3 women with ASCUS socioeconomic characteristics were as follows; one lived in city center, one lived in town a done lived in village. Also, two of them haven't got any social guarantee, all three of them didn't use cigarette or alcohol, married and this was their single marriage, first marriage ages of them was 13-19 years. Of these 3 women with ASCUS; menarche ages were 13, 14, 16 respectively, first pregnancy age range was 13-19. Again, 2 of them had got 4 and more pregnancy, they used intrauterine device, one of them had got chronic disease and used medicine continuously and one of them had got breast cancer in her family. However, in these comparing that above, any meaningful difference only between having social guarantee and number of birth was found as statistically (p < 0.05).
Cervical cancer is a preventable cancer among gynecological cancers because of its long preinvasion stage. Also, effective screening programs could supply early diagnosis for this disease [14]. In developed countries invasive cervical cancer rates decreased with using pap smear screening test at last 30 years [15-17]. So that, in order to decrease cervical cancer frequency, by an effective screening program, supplying the lesions that show invasive cancer is important. Whereby cervical cancer screening program in Taiwan, invasive cancer incidence decreased as 47.8% rate between 1995-2006 [18]. In our study, ages of 3 women with ASCUS were 37, 53 and 59. The other 3 women with HGSIL were 60-64 aged. When we noticed their age, it is seen that the women with HGSIL were older than the women with ASCUS and this result shows that with early diagnosis and treatment invasive cancer incidence could decrease. T.R. Health Ministry Cancer Department stated that in cervical cancer more than 95% of the cancer cases could be determined at an early stage (Stage 0,1,2) [19].
Characteristics |
n |
% |
Menarche age (X ± sd) |
13.60 ± 1.40 |
|
First pregnancy age ( n : 855 )* |
||
13-19 years |
528 |
61.8 |
20-26 years |
298 |
34.8 |
27 years old and over |
29 |
3.4 |
Fisrt delivery age ( n : 738 )* |
||
13-19 years |
408 |
55.3 |
20-26 years |
304 |
41.2 |
27 years old and over |
26 |
3.5 |
Last pregnancy age ( n : 347 )* |
||
17-26 years |
92 |
26.5 |
27-36 years |
206 |
59.4 |
37 years and over |
49 |
14.1 |
Number of pregnancy ( n : 865 )* |
|
|
1-3 |
281 |
32.5 |
4-6 |
430 |
49.7 |
7-9 |
119 |
13.8 |
10 and more |
35 |
4.0 |
Number of delivery ( n : 860 )* |
||
1-3 deliveries |
508 |
59.1 |
4-6 deliveries |
319 |
37.1 |
7 and over deliveries |
33 |
3.8 |
Number of miscarriage ( n : 485 )* |
||
1 |
224 |
46.2 |
2 |
146 |
30.1 |
3 |
68 |
14.0 |
4 and over |
47 |
9.7 |
Family planning method (n : 852)* |
||
Not use |
518 |
60.8 |
IUD |
201 |
23.6 |
Medicine |
30 |
3.5 |
Other |
103 |
12.1 |
Duration of using IUD ( n : 54)* |
||
1 year ≤ |
5 |
9.3 |
1 year > |
49 |
90.7 |
Characteristics | n | % |
Hormone therapy ( n : 850) * | ||
Take | 72 | 8.5 |
Not take | 778 | 91.5 |
Medicine used cntinuously ( n : 818) * | ||
Use | 305 | 37.3 |
Not use | 513 | 62.7 |
Chronic Disease ( n : 823) * | ||
Yes | 316 | 38.4 |
No | 507 | 61.6 |
Gynecological disease ( n : 873) * | ||
Yes | 59 | 6.8 |
No | 814 | 93.2 |
Breast cancer in family ( n : 775) * | ||
Yes | 62 | 8.0 |
No | 713 | 92.0 |
Gynecological cancer ( n : 761) * | ||
Yes | 30 | 3.9 |
No | 731 | 96.1 |
Pap-smear outcome ( n : 1087) |
n |
% |
Normal |
1071 |
98.5 |
ASCUS* |
3 |
0.3 |
HGSIL** |
3 |
0.3 |
Not enough |
10 |
0.9 |
Total |
1087 |
100 |
**HGSIL : High-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion
Among the risk factors for cervical cancer; low age for first intercourse (< 16 years), number of sexual partner, high parity, race, low socioeconomic level and smoking take important place [22]. In our study, it is determined that 3 women with HGSIL lived at village but other information documents weren't recorded. So, effective risk factors couldn't evaluate. Two of women with ASCUS hadn't got any social guarantee, their first marriage and pregnancy age were 13-19 years, their number of pregnancy was 4 and more and they used intrauterine device as family planning method. Also it is determined that 3 women with ASCUS had got a family member with breast cancer. In our study, there was a meaningful difference between having social guarantee and number of birth with the women had ASCUS (i). In the women who is polygamous and especially married before her 20, cervical cancer risk increase, distinctly [23]. We could state that our cases were in risk group especially because of their marriage and pregnancy ages and number of pregnancy. It is stated that early menarche age and short time between menarche age and first intercourse age are risk factors for cervical cancer [24]. In our study, menstrual age mean was almost 13 years and first marriage age of three in fourth of woman was 13-19 years (Table 1, 2). This result shows that they started intercourse at an early age. However there wasn't any significant relationship between these parameters and the women had ASCUS or HGSIL (p > 0.05)
Although pap-smear outcomes were normal in the most of the women in our study, it is thought that they should be done regular pap-smear tests because of their risk factors (Table 1, 2).
In 2012, American Cancer Society and American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists suggested that pap-smear screening ranges should be done between 21-29 ages in every 3 years and between 30-65 ages again in every 3 years, if only papsmear test is done. However, if this test is done with HPV test, it should be done in every 5 years for 30-65 aged women [25]. In a study of Ersöz, et al. 3000 women 24-64 aged were screened and 1.9 % of them found with ASCUS [7]. In this study, this rate was 0.3%. This high ASCUS diagnosis in other study could be because of the population which was taken from 24 years old. So, screening programs are suggested to start with 21 ages.
**The present study was presented as a oral presentations at I. National Women Health and Maternal and Child Health Congress on 18-19th of December, 2014 in İzmir, Turkey
- Kurtoglu E, Gürz AA. Cervix Cancer Epidemiology. Turkiye Clinics J Gynecol Obst-Special Topics. 2014;7(4):1-4.
- Globocan 2012:Estimated Cancer İncidence, Mortality and Prevalence Worldwide in 2002 -[cited 2015 January1 ]. Available from: http://globocan.iarc.fr/Pages/fact_sheets_population.aspx
- Preventing Cancer and Screening in Turkiye 2014 Brief report [cited 2015 January1]. Available from: http://kanser.gov.tr/kanser/kanser-taramalari/1444-kanser-taramalar%C4%B1-k%C4%B1sa-rapor-2014.html
- Bodur S, Eryılmaz MA, Civcik S, Durduran Y. The contribution of KETEM records to determination of cancers' distribution and incidence in population: the example of Konya. Journal of General Medicine. 2011;21(4):144-151.
- Ayhan A, Dursun P, Kuşçu E, Mülayim B, Haberal N, Ozen O, et al. Prevalence of cervical cytological abnormalities in Turkey. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2009;106(3):206-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2009.04.003.
- Kurdoğlu Z, Kurdoğlu M, Kundakçı G, Keremoğlu Ö. Screening program outcomes for cervix and breast cancers belong to 'Van Cancer Early Diagnosis, Screening and Education Center. Van Medicine Journal. 2009;16(4):119-123.
- Şafak Ersöz, Abdülkadir Reis, Nimet Baki. Cervical screening program in Trabzon county. J Turk Soc Obstet Gynecol. 2010;7(1):35-9.
- Kög İ, Turan T, Karabük E, Karayünlü B, Özgü N, Demir ÖF, et al. Cervical and Breast Cancer Secreening Programme Results of Etlik KETEM Group. TAF Preventive Medicine Bulletin. 2012;11(2):145-152.
- Karabulut A, Alan T, Ali Ekiz M, Iritaş A, Kesen Z, Yahşi S. Evaluation of cervical screening results in a population at normal risk. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2010;110(1):40-2. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2010.02.011.
- Nazlıcan E, Akbaba M, Koyuncu H, Savaş N, Karaca B. Cervical Cancer Screening between 35–40 Aged Women at Kisecik Region of Hatay Provinence. TAF Prev Med Bull. 2010;9(5):471-474.
- Kalyoncu C, Işıklı B, Özalp S, Küçük N. Knowledges, attitudes and behaviours of people who applied women disease and labour polyclinic of Osmangazi University. Health and Society. 2003;13:60-68.
- Gibbs RS, Karlan BY, Haney A.F, Naygard I. Danforth's Obstetrics and Gynecolocy. JB Lippincott Company. Philadelphia: 1997.
- Turhal SN, Pekin T, Pekin S. Standard and Promising future screening attitutes related to cervix cancer etyology. T Clin Gynecol Obst. 1999;9:215-220.
- Taşkın L. Birth and women's health nursing. 6th edition Ankara: Sistem ofset Matbaacılık. 2003:537-541.
- Nygård JF, Skare GB, Thoresen SØ. The cervical cancer screening programme in Norway, 1992–2000: changes in pap smear coverage and incidence of cervical cancer. J Med Screen. 2002;9(2):86-91.
- Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J, Pisani P. Global cancer statistics 2002. CA A Cancer Journal for Clinicians. 2005; 55(2):74-108.
- Van Leeuwen AW, NooijerP, Hop WC. Screening for cervical carcinoma. Cancer. 2005;105(5):270-276.
- Chen YY, You SL, Chen CA, Shih LY, Koong SL, Chao KY, et al. Effectiveness of national cervical cancer screening programme in Taiwan: 12-year experiences. Br J Cancer. 2009;101(1):174-7. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605139.
- Cancer screening statistics 2013 [cited 2015 January1]. Available from: http://kanser.gov.tr/Dosya/tarama/2013_tarama_istatistikleri.pdf
- Nokiani FA, Akbari H, Rezaei M, Madani H, Ale Agha ME. Cost--effectiveness of pap smear in Kermanshah, Iran. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2008;9(1):107-10.
- Tuncer M, Özgül N, Olcayto E, Gültekin M. Cancer Control in Türkiye. Ankara; Koza Press. 2009.
- Tuncer ZS. Serviks kanseri. In: Günalp S, Tuncer S, editors. Women diseases and labour diagnosis and treatment. Ankara: Pelikan Press. 2004:669-682.
- Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D. Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 2011;61(2):69-90. doi: 10.3322/caac.20107.
- Kanbur A, Çapık C. Cervical Cancer Prevention, Early Diagnosis-Screening Methods and Midwives / Nurses Role. Hacettepe University Faculty of Health Sciences Nursing Journal. 2011;61-72.
- Turkish Society of gynecologic onkology. Cervix cancer screening [cited 2016 March6]. Available from: http://www.trsgo.org/menu/168/rahim-agzi-kanseri-taramasi